RESUMEN
AIMS: Cardiovascular mortality has been reported to be 10- to 20-fold higher in chronic dialysis patients than in the age-matched general population. It has been suggested that increased oxidant stress and resulting vascular wall injury due to uremia and the hemodialysis procedure may be one of the mechanisms predisposing to these cardiovascular complications. Further, hemodialysis membrane bioincompatibility can contribute to increased oxidative stress and prevalence of inflammation. MATERIALS: We studied 18 chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients (age 62.8 +/- 14.7 years, 39% male, 61% African-American, 44% insulin-dependent diabetic, 61% smokers, 61% with documented coronary artery disease) during hemodialysis with 2 membranes with different flux and complement activating properties. METHODS: We have measured free and phospholipid-bound F2-isoprostane (F2-IsoP) levels, a sensitive marker of oxidative stress, in CHD patients and compared them to levels in healthy subjects. We have also examined the acute effects of the hemodialysis procedure using both biocompatible and bioincompatible membranes on F2-IsoP levels. RESULTS: The results indicated that, compared to controls, both free (96.2 +/- 48.8 pg/ml versus 37.6 +/- 17.2 pg/ml) and bound F2-IsoP (220.4 +/- 154.8 pg/ml versus 146.8 +/- 58.4 pg/ml) levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05 for both). There was a statistically significant decrease in free F2-IsoP concentrations at 15 and 30 minutes of HD, which rebounded to baseline levels at the completion of the procedure. There were no significant differences in F2-IsoP concentrations between the 2 study dialyzers at any time point. Age, smoking status, diabetes mellitus and presence of cardiovascular disease were also not correlated with F2-IsoP levels in this patient population. There was a significant association between predialysis F2-IsoP and C-reactive protein concentrations. CONCLUSION: Using a sensitive and specific assay for the measurement of F2-IsoP, we demonstrated that CHD patients are under increased oxidative stress. During a single hemodialysis treatment, the hemodialysis membrane appears to have no discernable effect on oxidative stress status. Measurement of F2-isoprostanes may be a useful biomarker of oxidative stress status as well as in developing new therapeutic strategies to ameliorate inflammatory and oxidative injury in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
F2-Isoprostanos/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Materiales Biocompatibles , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Enfermedad Coronaria/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Membranas Artificiales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/sangreAsunto(s)
Dermatosis Facial/diagnóstico , Quiste Folicular/diagnóstico , Hamartoma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Nasales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Glándulas Sebáceas/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dermatosis Facial/patología , Quiste Folicular/patología , Hamartoma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Nasales/patología , Enfermedades de las Glándulas Sebáceas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) have shown a relationship between the delivered dose of dialysis and patient survival. However, there is currently no consensus on the appropriate method to measure the dose of dialysis in ARF patients. In this study, the dose of dialysis was measured by blood- and dialysate-based kinetic methods in a group of ARF patients who required intermittent hemodialysis. METHODS: Treatments were performed using a Fresenius 2008E volumetric hemodialysis machine with the ability to fractionally collect the spent dialysate. Single-, double-pool, and equilibrated Kt/V were determined from the pre-, immediate post-, and 30-minute post-blood urea nitrogen (BUN) measurements. The solute reduction index was determined from the collected dialysate, as well as the single- and double-pool Kt/V. RESULTS: Forty-six treatments in 28 consecutive patients were analyzed. The mean prescribed Kt/V (1.11 +/- 0.32) was significantly greater than the delivered dose estimated by single-pool (0.96 +/- 0.33), equilibrated (0.84 +/- 0.28), and double-pool (0.84 +/- 0.30) Kt/V (compared with prescribed, each P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the equilibrated and double-pool Kt/V (P = NS). The solute removal index, as determined from the dialysate, corresponded to a Kt/V of 0.56 +/- 0.27 and was significantly lower than the single-pool and double-pool Kt/V (each P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Blood-based kinetics used to estimate the dose of dialysis in ARF patients on intermittent hemodialysis provide internally consistent results. However, when compared with dialysate-side kinetics, blood-based kinetics substantially overestimated the amount of solute (urea) removal.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Lesión Renal Aguda/sangre , Nitrógeno de la Urea Sanguínea , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Cinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/sangreRESUMEN
The current study was designed first to determine separately the prescribed and delivered dose of dialysis and, second, to determine what factors lead to failure to deliver the prescribed dose of dialysis in patients with acute renal failure (ARF). Forty patients, who collectively underwent 136 dialysis treatments, were studied prospectively at two institutions. The results showed that almost half the prescriptions (49%) were for a Kt/V less than 1.2 and, more importantly, nearly 70% of the treatments delivered a Kt/V less than 1.2, the minimally acceptable dose defined in the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines for chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients. Patient predialysis weight was the most important variable associated with a low prescribed and delivered dose of dialysis, as well as lack of delivery of the prescribed dose of dialysis. From the statistical model, it is estimated that for every 10-kg increase in predialysis weight, the chance of prescribing or delivering a Kt/V less than 1.2 increased 4.6- and 1.95-fold, respectively. The lower than prescribed blood flow achieved by the temporary catheters and patients not receiving anticoagulation were variables also associated with not receiving the prescribed Kt/V. It is concluded that patients with ARF are prescribed and receive a dose of dialysis that would be considered inadequate for CHD patients. Until the association between dose of dialysis and outcome is better defined, it would be prudent that both the dialysis prescription and the delivery of dialysis to patients with ARF should be performed with the same care and goals as that currently received by patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).