Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Pain ; 18(2): 197-208, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545499

RESUMEN

Background: In most cases, a combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen are the optimal treatment for postoperative pain in third molar surgery. If stronger analgesia is required, opioids are traditionally administered. In day-case, surgery; however, opioids should be avoided. Thus, the anaesthetic agent S-ketamine in analgesic doses might be preferred. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. The study enrolled healthy subjects according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification; I or II (ASA), aged 18 to 44 years, with a body weight between 50 and 100 kg. The patients were randomized into three groups where two doses of S-ketamine were compared (high: 0.25 mg/kg or low: 0.125 mg/kg) with placebo (saline). Results: A primary outcome of the study was that VAS at 4 h postoperatively, showed no significant difference between the placebo and high-dose S-ketamine group or in the low-dose group. We found a significant difference between the groups for the first 24 h, with a lower VAS-score in the high-dose S-ketamine group. The time to when 50% had taken their first rescue medication was 12 min later in the high-dose ketamine group. Conclusions: Pre-emptive S-ketamine 0.25 mg/kg gave a global significant reduction of pain by VAS during the first 24 h postoperatively. The time from end of surgery to first rescue medication were longer in the high-dose ketamine group compared to both low-dose ketamine and placebo groups.

2.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 19(4): 353-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925999

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient safety, in terms of adverse events, alterations in blood pressure or oxygen saturation (SpO2) in two routine sedation procedures, with and without intravenous analgesia. METHODS: Patients referred for surgical removal of mandibular third molars were treated in a randomized, controlled, single-blinded procedure. Eighty-seven men and women, aged 18 to 44 years, were allotted to either of two treatment groups, midazolam + tramadol (M + T) and midazolam + saline (M + S) or to a control group (C), given no sedation. RESULTS: Tramadol at 1 mg/kg body weight resulted in a higher frequency of oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 90 %) than a placebo (p = 0.002) but had no effect on mean SpO2 at the end point or at the end of surgery. In both the test groups, there was a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) from baseline to the end of surgery. CONCLUSION: The results confirm that pre-emptive intravenous tramadol, administered at 1 mg/kg body weight as an adjunct to midazolam sedation for third molar surgery, offers a safe method. But, it should be noted that our previous study shows that it is not a particularly effective analgesic. Further testing is therefore warranted, using other doses or other drugs, to find a better intravenous protocol for postoperative analgesia, with maximum effect and minimal risk, in outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures.


Asunto(s)
Midazolam/farmacología , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Seguridad del Paciente , Extracción Dental/métodos , Diente Impactado/cirugía , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Tramadol/farmacología , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA