Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(12): 3155-3162, 2020 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121313

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aims to determine the causes of vaccine mistrust among family healthcare professionals (FHP) in the unit where they serve and vaccine hesitancy of families. METHOD: The study group consisted of 682 FHPs working in a primary health care institution. The data collection tools of the study included a sociodemographic data form and a vaccine hesitancy data form. Pearson's chi-square analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze the data. FINDINGS: To the question of "Do you trust the active ingredient in the vaccines?", only 2.1% of FHPs responded "I do not trust" and 18.9% answered "I am indecisive". 70.7% of FHPs said that at least one vaccine hesitant family was in the unit where they served. The most important reasons stated by FHPs on behalf of such families were vaccine mistrust (73.2%), the belief that they may be harmful for the child (58.7%), and the belief that vaccines cause autism (55.6%). In the univariate analysis, vaccine mistrust was significantly higher in FHPs who were measles-hesitant and responded "The decision to get vaccinated or not should belong to the family voluntarily". From logistic regression analysis, vaccine mistrust in FHPs increased 2.8-fold for those who did not think vaccination should be compulsory, 2.7-fold for those who did not think that vaccination refusal should be legally enforced, and 1.61-fold for those under age 35 years. CONCLUSION: It was observed that FHPs had high sensitivity and positive attitudes toward vaccination in general.


Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacunas , Adulto , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Turquía , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA