RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to analyse tuberculosis (TB) risk assessment for rheumatology patients commencing anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) therapy using the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines. Data were obtained retrospectively on 856 outpatients regionally receiving anti-TNF-alpha. Prior to commencing treatment, patients had the following assessments documented: respiratory examination, 47.4%; chest X-ray, 84.5%; TB history, 92.9%; and advice about TB risk, 45.8%. Of the 856 patients, 94.3% were on immunosuppressives but 27% had a tuberculin test; 12.6% had > or =1 high-risk factors for TB. In total, 3.4% were referred to a TB specialist and of these, 24.1% had no risk factors for TB. Of patients with > or =1 risk factor, 76.9% were not referred. Only 4/28 patients at high risk for TB due to ethnicity or birthplace received chemoprophylaxis. Marked inter-unit variation was demonstrated and it was evident that patients require improved screening for TB. Greater awareness is necessary of patients with risk factors, particularly ethnicity, to facilitate more appropriate targeting of chemoprophylaxis. Multi-centre audit is a valuable clinical governance tool.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Tumour necrosis factor alpha-blockers (TNF-alpha) are licensed for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and their use has been approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for use in the United Kingdom under a set of defined clinical criteria. METHODS: In this out-patient study we evaluated PsA in rheumatology secondary care clinics in units across the West Midlands over a 2-week period, assessing prevalence, disease activity and eligibility for anti TNF-alpha treatment as defined by the NICE criteria. RESULTS: Of the 1718 forms returned from the 2000 sent (86% response rate), 175 patients had PsA (10.2%). Of those, 22 (12.6%) were already on anti TNF-alpha treatment. 12 patients were noted to have purely axial disease and as per the NICE guidelines should not be assessed under the PsA criteria. A further 5 patients fulfilled the criteria for treatment with anti TNF-alpha with no contraindications. In the region 22 out of 27 patients (81%) with active disease were correctly on Anti TNF therapy. In total 27 (15.4%) patients with PsA met the NICE criteria for treatment of PsA with anti TNF-alpha therapy. 3 patients had previously failed anti TNF-alpha treatment. No patient fulfilling criteria for treatment were found to have any contraindications to treatment. CONCLUSION: We note the relatively high proportion of PsA patients eligible for treatment with anti TNF-alpha blockers in the region (15.4%) compared to the NICE estimate (2.4%). This may be in part explained by a selection bias. However, the results may have significant implications for healthcare provision given the relatively high cost of anti-TNF-alpha agents. We comment on the limitations of such criteria and the effective use of regional collaboration for both training and audit purposes.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often have comorbidities with associated disability and complex medication regimens. Little published evidence exists about why people with RA require so many medications, although it is logical to hypothesize that this may relate to older age, longer duration of RA, more active RA, worse functional disability and a greater number of comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: We set out to quantify polypharmacy in RA and identify its predictors in an observational cohort. METHODS: The case notes of 348 people receiving secondary care for RA were reviewed to record polypharmacy. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was calculated and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ) were completed. RESULTS: The mean total number of medications was 5.39, with a maximum of 16; of these, a mean of 2.41 medications were directly for RA. A mediational relationship was identified: older age and longer RA duration were significant predictors of a greater total number of medications, but these relationships were explained by the greater number of comorbidities in older participants and those with longer RA duration. Polypharmacy was not related to RA activity or functional disability. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy is common among people with RA and associates with older age and longer RA duration through a greater number of comorbidities. Regular review of the full treatment plan of individuals with RA by pharmacists and other health professionals specializing in rheumatology, to weigh the benefits and risks of each medication and their interactions in light of RA activity and comorbidities, is advocated.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Secondary care rheumatology services for patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) in the West Midlands were audited using Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Alliance (ARMA) standards of care. Questionnaires were analysed from 1,715 patients in 11 rheumatology departments. ARMA standards recommend full multidisciplinary team assessment; referral rates to nurse specialists (52.3%), physiotherapists (48.7%) and occupational therapists (36.5%) were, however, lower than expected. Attendance at existing hospital-led education groups was rare (8.9%), awareness of existing helplines was moderate (59.2%) but the proportion of patients reporting satisfaction with advice about their disease was high (80.5%). Significant variations were found between departments. For patients with IA < 2 years (n = 236), 84.5% were seen by a rheumatologist within the ARMA standard of 12 weeks of referral; diagnosis of a type of IA was made at the first rheumatology appointment in 66.4%; 82.8% of rheumatoid arthritis patients had commenced disease-modifying drugs, although time to commencement varied across departments. This study raises issues regarding provision of rheumatology services, prioritisation of patient referral and patient education.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been an important development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but the impact of its delivery on hospital resources in still emerging. AIMS: We audited the effect of starting anti-TNF on the use of other anti-rheumatic therapies and hospital resources in a routine secondary care setting. METHODS: A retrospective study of resource use before and after anti-TNF was conducted. Hospital records of 54 RA patients were studied and data taken from the time of commencing anti-TNF to 1 October 2004 and an equal time period prior to commencing anti-TNF. Identical data were collected for 54 controls not on anti-TNF. Relevant figures were extrapolated to per annum rates. Results were analysed using two-factor ANOVAs comparing the pre- versus post-anti-TNF period. Cases on intravenous (IV) versus subcutaneous (SC) anti-TNF were also compared in separate ANOVAs. RESULTS: Mean duration of anti-TNF therapy was 17.04 months (range 3.60-42.36). Mean pre- and 3-months post-anti-TNF Disease Activity Scores (DAS28) were 6.93 and 3.88, respectively. Cases were more likely than controls to be on oral prednisolone pre- and post-anti-TNF. Methylprednisolone requirement, number of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), telephone helpline contacts and duration as an inpatient reduced significantly post-anti-TNF. Day case admissions increased but outpatient appointments decreased only in cases on IV anti-TNF. CONCLUSIONS: In a pragmatic setting, anti-TNF therapy led to reduced need for steroid injections and other DMARDs, as well as reductions in use of several hospital resources. Wider replication of these findings will be important for planning delivery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Outwardly visible signs associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can include facial rashes, alopecia and weight gain. We sought to understand the concerns of SLE patients about their appearance and the recognition of this by healthcare professionals. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 10 women aged 26-68 years diagnosed with SLE for one to 12 years. Data were analysed with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA); this seeks to describe and provide understanding of people's experience of a phenomenon by studying in-depth a small number from a relatively homogeneous group (women with SLE in the present study). Analysis revealed three themes concerning appearance issues. Participants described public self-consciousness after the onset of SLE. Cosmetics and clothing were used skilfully to appear 'normal', hide the 'self' and assert control but could increase feelings of difference and isolation. Self-imposed isolation was also described and may relate to depression. The understanding of family, friends, colleagues and healthcare providers was also important. Awareness of the psychosocial concerns of SLE patients with life-changing skin disease may enable multidisciplinary healthcare teams to offer a more sensitive, practical service. The physical and emotional needs of SLE patients need to be ascertained and appropriate educational and psychological services are required.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatology outpatients in the West Midlands was audited in relation to the 2002 Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Guidelines and re-audited in relation to the 1998 National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) Guidance. Practice was assessed from prospective data on all follow-up patients over a 2-week period in 13 rheumatology units. Data were analysed on 2,609 patients. Of the 626 patients fulfilling criteria for assessment against the RCP Guidelines, 351 (56.1%) were treated appropriately. The results do not allow for availability of, or wait for, DEXA scanning. Of 197 patients fulfilling the criteria for assessment against the NOS Guidance, 137 (69.5%) were treated appropriately, compared to 63% in a similar audit undertaken in 2000. Regional audit may facilitate clinical governance. These audits will inform discussion on both improving local practice and strengthening cases for improved osteoporosis services.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous abnormalities are common in rheumatoid arthritis, but exact prevalence estimates are yet to be established. Some abnormalities may be independent and coincidental, whereas others may relate to rheumatoid arthritis or its treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the exact nature and point prevalence of cutaneous abnormalities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with those in patients with non-inflammatory rheumatic disease. METHODS: 349 consecutive outpatients for rheumatology (205 with rheumatoid arthritis and 144 with non-inflammatory rheumatic conditions) were examined for skin and nail signs by a dermatologist. Histories of rheumatology, dermatology, drugs and allergy were noted in detail. RESULTS: Skin abnormalities were reported by more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (61%) than non-inflammatory controls (47%). More patients with rheumatoid arthritis (39%) than controls (10%) attributed their skin abnormality to drugs. Cutaneous abnormalities observed by the dermatologist were also more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (76%) than in the group with non-inflammatory disease (60%). Specifically, bruising, athlete's foot, scars, rheumatoid nodules and vasculitic lesions were more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than in controls. The presence of bruising was predicted only by current steroid use. The presence of any other specific cutaneous abnormalities was not predicted by any of the variables assessed. In the whole group, current steroid use and having rheumatoid arthritis were the only important predictors of having any cutaneous abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported and observed cutaneous abnormalities are more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis than in controls with non-inflammatory disease. These include cutaneous abnormalities related to side effects of drugs or to rheumatoid arthritis itself and other abnormalities previously believed to be independent but which may be of clinical importance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceptions of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) about their health care provision in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 women aged 26 to 68 years who were diagnosed with SLE one to 12 years earlier. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis to organise the themes of importance to participants. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: diagnostic difficulties; understanding; communication; and integrated health care. Before diagnosis there was concern to appear legitimately ill and to have a label for the condition. After diagnosis participants still encountered health care professionals who were poorly informed about SLE. Family, friends, and employers did not understand the fluctuating nature of SLE, which often led to isolation. Participants felt that even health care professionals who specialised in SLE could not fully understand the psychosocial impact of the condition, and therefore did not provide information to meet those needs. Participants did not know which of the many health care professionals they had contact with to approach about their concerns. Lack of communication at an interdisciplinary level left them feeling that nobody was "joining the dots" for their health care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLE do not feel understood by health care providers or people close to them. Support from trained volunteers with SLE, as available at the open access lupus clinic in Dudley (West Midlands, UK), would ensure more adequate information from someone with personal experience. Such services may improve communication and help minimise SLE patients' isolation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular mortality is increased in rheumatoid arthritis. Possible reasons include an increased incidence of ischaemic heart disease or worse outcome after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome of ACS in rheumatoid arthritis compared with case matched controls in the context of underlying cardiac risk factors, clinical presentation, and subsequent management. METHODS: 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ACS identified from coronary care admission registers between 1990 and 2000 were case matched as closely as possible for age, sex, classical cardiovascular risk factors, type and severity of ACS, and admission date (+/-3 months) with 40 controls. A standardised proforma was used for detailed case note review. RESULTS: Age, sex, other cardiovascular risk factors, and type and severity of presenting ACS were not significantly different between cases and controls. Recurrent cardiac events were commoner in rheumatoid arthritis (23/40, 57.5%) than controls (12/40, 30%) (p = 0.013); there were 16/40 deaths in rheumatoid arthritis (40%) v 6/40 (15%) in controls (p = 0.012). Recurrent events occurred earlier in rheumatoid arthritis (log rank survival, p = 0.05). Presentation with chest pain occurred in all controls compared with 33/40 rheumatoid patients (82%) (p = 0.006); collapse occurred in one control (2.5%) v 7/40 rheumatoid patients (17.5%) (p = 0.025). Treatment during the ACS was not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent ischaemic events and death occur more often after ACS in rheumatoid arthritis. Atypical presentation is commoner in rheumatoid arthritis. There is an urgent need to develop identification and intervention strategies for ACS specific to this high risk group.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the preferences of rheumatology patients for the time and location of their out-patient appointments. METHODS: All patients attending the rheumatology out-patient services at Dudley Group of Hospitals NHS Trust over a 2-week period were asked to complete a purpose-designed, scannable, previously piloted, self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Four hundred and nineteen patients completed questionnaires (response rate 87%). Age ranged from 16 to 92 yr; 38% of responders were over 65 yr, 72% were female, 57% had an inflammatory arthritis, 20% had a connective tissue disease, 8% had degenerative joint disease and 15% had another diagnosis; 29% were employed, 51% retired and 20% unemployed. Fewer than 1% of patients would like to be seen at community general practice centres (99.3% would prefer a hospital site). Proximity to their home was the main determinant of hospital choice. Monday was the most popular day for appointments, and days from Tuesday to Friday received equal rankings. Only 0.5% of patients would choose a weekend clinic. Fifty-eight per cent of patients would prefer morning appointments, 24% afternoon appointments and 2% evening appointments; 16% did not mind. Only being employed predicted out-of-hours preference. CONCLUSIONS: In this predominantly suburban, industrialized area, rheumatology out-patients prefer to be seen in the hospital rather than primary care environment, ideally close to their home, with appointments in the morning and on a weekday. These results may be generalizable to other districts and other chronic disease states, but we suggest that similar surveys become part of routine service provision and inform current and future planning.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) have different psychological morbidity (and psychosocial risk factors for it) compared with RA patients without co-morbid CVD. METHODS: Patients with RA and co-morbid CVD (n = 44; hypertension alone for n = 27) were compared with RA patients without CVD (n = 110). Differences in psychological morbidity (depression and anxiety) and psychosocial risk factors for this (arthritis self-efficacy, acceptance, social support and optimism) were examined while controlling statistically for medical and demographic covariates. RESULTS: Groups did not differ on RA duration, RA activity, marital status or socioeconomic status, but RA patients with co-morbid CVD were older, less likely to be female and less likely to be in employment than those without CVD. RA patients with co-morbid CVD had significantly higher depression and were more likely to score above cut-offs for depression than RA patients without CVD. No differences existed in anxiety, although anxiety appeared to be more common than depression. Low optimism was identified as a possible psychosocial risk factor for depression. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with co-morbid CVD have higher depression than RA patients without CVD; low optimism is a potentially modifiable risk factor that may mediate this difference. RA patients with co-morbid CVD may benefit from systematic screening for depression and targeted intervention if necessary.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The reasons for this remain unknown, but traditional risk factors for CHD identified in the general population may be important contributors. OBJECTIVE: To assess comparatively the prevalence of traditional CHD risk factors and the absolute 10-year CHD risk in patients with RA or osteoarthritis (OA) without known cardiovascular co-morbidity. METHODS: Consecutive Caucasian hospital outpatients with RA (n = 150) or OA (n = 100) aged 40-75 years were assessed for known cardiovascular co-morbidity, age, sex, smoking status, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), height, weight, systolic blood pressure (BP), total cholesterol (TC) and HDL cholesterol. Absolute 10-year CHD risk for each individual was calculated using the Joint British Societies CHD risk calculator. RESULTS: Prevalence and distribution of known cardiovascular co-morbid conditions were similar in RA (56/150, 37%) and OA (34/100, 34%). The resulting subgroups of patients without known co-morbidity (RA: n = 94; OA: n = 66) were not significantly different for age, sex, DM, smoking, systolic BP or TC: HDL cholesterol ratio. There was no significant difference in the absolute 10-year CHD risk between RA and OA (15.6+/-11.0 versus 14.8+/-9.3, p = 0.63). However, a significant proportion of patients without known cardiovascular disease in both the RA and OA subgroups had a 10-year CHD risk above the 15% or 30% risk levels, indicating the need for possible or definite intervention respectively. Over 80% of RA patients had at least 1 CHD risk factor that could be modified. CONCLUSION: Absolute 10-year CHD risk was not different between RA and OA patients in this study. Substantial numbers of RA and OA patients have potentially modifiable CHD risk factors present. We suggest that CHD risk should be assessed and modifiable risk factors addressed in the routine rheumatology clinic setting.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We report two patients who developed varicella zoster virus (VZV) ophthalmicus complicated by ipsilateral keratouveitis, and within 4 weeks developed acute retinal necrosis (ARN) in the contralateral eye. The ipsilateral retina was spared in each case. One patient had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the other Hodgkin's disease. Both patients were in remission at the time of presentation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Audit is an important tool in clinical governance. Combining resources from across a region may facilitate data collection and allow variation in practice between individual units to be analysed. This audit is the first such regional audit to be carried out in rheumatology in the West Midlands and the organization and value of regional audit is discussed. This audit assessed the prevention and management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis (CIOP). METHODS: Adult patients attending rheumatology follow-up clinics in 10 units, during a 2-week period were assessed using the 1998 National Osteoporosis Society (NOS) guidance on the prevention and management of CIOP. The audit standard adopted was that 80% of eligible patients should be on appropriate therapy. RESULTS: Data was collected on 1766 (95.2%) of 1855 patients during the audit period. Two hundred and thirty-five (13.3%) were currently being prescribed or about to commence >or=7.5 mg daily of oral prednisolone for >or=6 months. Dual X-ray absorptiometry scans were performed in 102 patients (43.4%). Of these, 53 (52%) had a T score of -1.5 or below at the hip or spine. Of the 235 patients, 202 (86%) were receiving osteoporosis treatment. One hundred and forty-eight patients (63%) were receiving appropriate osteoporosis medication according to the NOS 1998 guidelines and 87 (37%) were inappropriately treated. Of these, 71 (81.6%) were under-treated and 16 (18.4%) were over-treated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the Region failed to meet the audit standard. The audit highlighted a number of differences and potential problems in the West Midlands with regard to CIOP which are currently being addressed by individual units and the West Midlands Rheumatology Services and Training Committee (WMRSTC). The Committee plan to re-audit in 2 yr.

Asunto(s)