Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 19(6): 737-741, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27811444

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a challenging complication of pregnancies and an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Management of morbidities associated with PPROM is fraught with controversy. However, women should be informed of these complications. OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to review the morbidities, concordance, and predictors of PPROM over a 10-year period. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of morbidities, concordance, and predictors of PPROM among pregnant women at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2008. The morbidities, concordance, and predictors of PPROM were expressed by regression analysis output for PPROM. RESULTS: Primigravidae had the highest occurrence of PPROM. Increasing parity does not significantly influence the incidence of PPROM. The concordance and predictors of PPROM are maternal age (P < 0.000), gestational age at PROM (P < 0.000), latency period (P < 0.000), and birth weight (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PPROM is a major complication of pregnancies and an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Management of these morbidities associated with PPROM poses a great challenge. However, women should be informed of these complications.


Asunto(s)
Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales/epidemiología , Mortalidad Perinatal , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Peso al Nacer , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Enfermedades del Prematuro/epidemiología , Edad Materna , Morbilidad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Niger J Med ; 21(3): 304-7, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23304925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Episiotomy is the most commonly performed obstetric procedure. The indications and efficacy are poorly established and its practice has remained controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and the determinants of episiotomy in the parturients at the UNTH, Enugu. METHODS: A five year retrospective review of episiotomy at UNTH Enugu between 1st January, 2000 and 31st December, 2004. RESULTS: Out of 3032 vaginal deliveries, 1201 women had episiotomy during vaginal delivery, giving a rate of 39.6%. The rate fluctuated between 38.7% in 2000 to 32.7% in 2004. The risk of receiving episiotomy is significantly higher among primigravidae than multigravidae [OR = 10.92, (95% CI = 8.98,13.28)]. Similarly, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 kg) significantly increases the risk of episiotomy [OR = 0.096, (95% CI = 0.06, 0.15)]. Women who had instrumental or destructive vaginal delivery are significantly more likely to receive episiotomy than those who had spontaneous vaginal delivery [OR = 0.13 (95% CI = 0.07, 0.26)]. The postpartum blood loss is significantly higher among women that received episiotomy than those who did not [t = 42.161, P > 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of episiotomy in UNTH, Enugu is high. Primigravidity, macrosomia and instrumental deliveries are factors associated with increased risk of episiotomy. Knowledge of these risk factors will guide in predicting episiotomy among paturients in labour ward.


Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Episiotomía/tendencias , Paridad , Episiotomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Nigeria , Parto , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Biosoc Sci ; 41(6): 789-98, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19552827

RESUMEN

This study was carried out in two medical facilities in Enugu, Nigeria, from September to November 2007. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from HIV-positive pregnant women accessing PMTCT (prevention of maternal-to-child transmission) services at the two centres. Ninety-two women were interviewed: 89 (96.7%) had disclosed their status, while 3 (3.3%) had not. Of the 89 women who had disclosed, 84 (94.4%) had disclosed to partners, 82 (92.1%) to husbands, 2 (2.2%) to fiancés, 18 (20.2%) to sisters, 13 (14.6%) to mothers, 10 (11.2%) to brothers, 10 (11.2%) to fathers and 10 (11.2%) to priests. Fifty-two (58.4%) gave emotional support as the reason for disclosure and 46 (51.7%) gave economic and financial support as reasons. Fifty-six (62.9%) reported understanding from partner as a positive outcome and 44 (49.4%) reported financial support. Forty-six (51.7%) reported no negative outcome. Serostatus disclosure rate in this study was high with most women disclosing to their partners.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Revelación , Familia , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Parejas Sexuales , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Humanos , Motivación , Nigeria , Embarazo , Rechazo en Psicología , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 99(2): 113-6, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17662288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the experience of women in whom a trial of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) has failed. METHODS: Pretested self-administered questionnaires containing both open- and closed-ended questions were given to the participants while they were waiting for an antenatal check-up. The responses to the closed-ended questions were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used for the responses to the open-ended questions. RESULTS: The women with a history of a successful vaginal delivery reported a positive experience whereas those with no history of vaginal delivery reported a negative experience. The women found the limited options available to them the most dissatisfying aspect of attempting a VBAC. CONCLUSION: An unsuccessful trial of VBAC could have significant adverse effects on women, especially on those who have never given birth vaginally. Adequate antenatal education for women planning a trial of VBAC, postdelivery support following an unsuccessful trial of VBAC, and research aimed at expanding the options available to women as they are attempting VBAC are recommended.


Asunto(s)
Esfuerzo de Parto , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Embarazo , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA