RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of a patent ductus arteriosus in a population of preterm infants is controversial. Traditionally, when the patent ductus arteriosus does not close either with conservative treatment or in response to pharmacological therapy, the only option is surgical closure. However, transcatheter occlusion might provide a therapeutic alternative. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for non-randomised and randomised controlled trials that compared transcatheter percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus with surgical ligation in low-birth-weight preterm infants (<2,500 g). A random-effects model was used for outcomes with high heterogeneity. RESULTS: We included twelve studies comprising 4,668 low-birth-weight preterm infants, of whom 966 (20.7%) were in the transcatheter percutaneous closure group, and 3,702 (79.3%) patients were included in the surgical group. All-cause mortality (OR 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.423; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and haemodynamic instability (OR 0.10; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.21; p < 0.001; I2 = 14%) were significantly lower in the transcatheter percutaneous closure group. There was no significant difference between transcatheter and surgical patent ductus arteriosus closure for the outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.46-1.87; p = 0.83; I2 = 0%) and major complications (OR 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.69; p = 0.51; I2 = 43%). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure in preterm infants under 2,500 g is a safe and effective alternative to surgical treatment. There was a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality and haemodynamic instability with transcatheter intervention compared to surgical closure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The antithrombotic management following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients who do not have a concurrent indication for long-term anticoagulation therapy is an ongoing source of debate. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus antiplatelet therapy after TAVR in patients without a concomitant indication for chronic oral anticoagulation. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Risk ratios (RR) with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three studies were included, with 2922 patients who underwent TAVR, of whom 1463 (50.1%) received DOACs. Patients who received DOACs therapy had significantly higher all-cause mortality (RR: 1.68; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.22-2.30; p = 0.001) and non-cardiovascular mortality (RR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.13-4.80; p = 0.02). The incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.8%; RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.90-2.32; p = 0.13). There was no difference between DOACs and antiplatelet therapy in terms of: ischemic stroke (RR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.76-2.15; p = 0.35) and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.92-2.03; p = 0.13). Lastly, the DOACs group had a significantly lower risk of valve thrombosis than the antiplatelet group (0.8% vs. 3.2%; RR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.14-0.51; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing DOACs to antiplatelet therapy after TAVR in patients without a concomitant indication for anticoagulation, DOACs were associated with a lower incidence of valve thrombosis and a higher rate of all-cause mortality, driven by an increase in noncardiac causes of death.

RESUMEN

A insuficiência cardíaca constitui um grande problema de saúde pública mundial, em virtude de sua prevalência e elevadas taxas de morbidade. No entanto, apesar dos avanços terapêuticos farmacológicos e não farmacológicos, as terapias disponíveis não atendem completamente às necessidades dos pacientes com falência cardíaca e, por isso, estratégias adicionais estão sendo desenvolvidas...

Asunto(s)