RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the clinical and financial aspects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared to open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS: Thirty-six patients treated with LC were prospectively, not randomized, compared with 35 patients that underwent OC. The data used were taken from local registers, patient-statistics and hospital accounting systems. We evaluated the costs, morbidity and mortality for both surgical procedures. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed concerning the number of days that pain was suffered (mean 7.6 days in LC versus 18.5 days in OC), the duration of postoperative hospitalization (LC mean 2-3 days; OC 7-9 days), the extent of postoperative monitoring performed, and the number of days in order to return to normal activity (mean 4.4 days in LC; mean 7.6 days in OC). Calculation of the costs was based on the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG). The profit for a DRG is the result of the difference between the reimbursement obtained from the execution of the operation and the cost in order to carry it out. The total cost for the execution of LC is Italian 3,332,632 pound sterling with a profit of Italian 1,208,807 pound sterling while for OC the cost is 4,007,359 pound sterling and the profit is 347,041 pound sterling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study is that, clinically and financially, LC has obvious advantages over OC.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía/economía , Colecistectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/economía , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a so called mini-invasive surgical procedure, and on this basis, we investigated whether and how the immune response is modified in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to patients who underwent open cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: In a prospective, nonrandomized trial, 35 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 31 open cholecystectomy. Immune activity (neutrophils, total lymphocytes, lymphocyte subpopulations, human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DR), interleukin 6, skin Multitest) was evaluated before surgery and respectively, 1, 3, and 6 days postoperatively. RESULTS: One day after surgery, an increase in interleukin 6 (P < 0.01) was noted in patients who had undergone open cholecystectomy, while this parameter was almost unchanged in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, skin tests showed a hypo or anergic response in the majority (81.8%) of open cholecystectomy patients compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (10.5%), (P < 0.01). Finally, monocyte antigen HLA-DR was also reduced in open cholecystectomy patients (P < 0.05). In this group, we noted 2 cases (6.45%) of respiratory tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Even though laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires a longer surgery, it reduces postoperative pain, and hospitalization. It also facilitates rapid recovery, a return to normal activity, avoids postoperative immunosuppression and shows a better postoperative morbidity compared to open surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistectomía , Interleucina-6/sangre , Síndrome Poscolecistectomía/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-DR/sangre , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica/inmunología , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/inmunología , Piel/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early laparoscopy plays a very important role in the diagnosis and treatment of uncertain surgical diseases. Its use is not very clear, in part because it is a very new technique and secondly because its application in emergency surgery is very recent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical approach. METHODS: In the last six years, during emergency laparoscopy, we diagnosed various gynaecological diseases. We performed 4 ovarian cystectomies (25%), 2 salpingectomies (12.5%), 6 salpingo-oophorectomies (37.5%), 2 myomectomies (18.75%), 1 endocoagulation (6.25%). RESULTS: Neither conversion in open surgery, nor major postoperatory complications were noted. Intervention time was shorter than that of the open technique. Return to normal activity was earlier. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contribute to demonstrate that, in emergency surgery, laparoscopy constitute a valid and efficient diagnostic and therapeutic technique. It is indicated for the treatment of acute abdomen of unknown origin.