RESUMEN
VRC-HIVMAB060-00-AB (VRC01) is a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) isolated from the B cells of an HIV-infected patient. It is directed against the HIV-1 CD4 binding site and is capable of potently neutralizing the majority of diverse HIV-1 strains. This Phase I dose-escalation study in healthy adults was conducted at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD, USA). Primary objectives were the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of VRC01 intravenous (i.v.) infusion at 5, 20 or 40 mg/kg, given either once (20 mg/kg) or twice 28 days apart (all doses), and of subcutaneous (s.c.) delivery at 5 mg/kg compared to s.c. placebo given twice, 28 days apart. Cumulatively, 28 subjects received 43 VRC01 and nine received placebo administrations. There were no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. Mean 28-day serum trough concentrations after the first infusion were 35 and 57 µg/ml for groups infused with 20 mg/kg (n = 8) and 40 mg/kg (n = 5) doses, respectively. Mean 28-day trough concentrations after the second infusion were 56 and 89 µg/ml for the same two doses. Over the 5-40 mg/kg i.v. dose range (n = 18), the clearance was 0.016 l/h and terminal half-life was 15 days. After infusion VRC01 retained expected neutralizing activity in serum, and anti-VRC01 antibody responses were not detected. The human monoclonal antibody (mAb) VRC01 was well tolerated when delivered i.v. or s.c. The mAb demonstrated expected half-life and pharmacokinetics for a human immunoglobulin G. The safety and PK results support and inform VRC01 dosing schedules for planning HIV-1 prevention efficacy studies.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , VIH-1 , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos ampliamente neutralizantes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Infecciones por VIH/sangre , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Avian influenza virus causes outbreaks in domestic and wild birds around the world, and sporadic human infections have been reported. A DNA vaccine encoding hemagglutinin (HA) protein from the A/Indonesia/5/05 (H5N1) strain was initially tested in two randomized phase I clinical studies. Vaccine Research Center study 304 (VRC 304) was a double-blinded study with 45 subjects randomized to placebo, 1 mg of vaccine, or 4 mg of vaccine treatment groups (n = 15/group) by intramuscular (i.m.) Biojector injection. VRC 305 was an open-label study to evaluate route, with 44 subjects randomized to intradermal (i.d.) injections of 0.5 mg by needle/syringe or by Biojector or 1 mg delivered as two 0.5-mg Biojector injections in the same deltoid or as 0.5 mg in each deltoid (n = 11/group). Injections were administered at weeks 0, 4, and 8 in both studies. Antibody responses to H5 were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and neutralization assay, and the H5 T cell responses were assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot and intracellular cytokine staining assays. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events, and the vaccine was well tolerated in all groups. At 1 mg, i.d. vaccination compared to i.m. vaccination induced a greater frequency and magnitude of response by ELISA, but there were no significant differences in the frequency or magnitude of response between the i.d. and i.m. routes in the HAI or neutralization assays. T cell responses were more common in subjects who received the 1- or 4-mg dose i.m. These studies demonstrated that the DNA vaccine encoding H5 is safe and immunogenic and served to define the proper dose and route for further studies. The i.d. injection route did not offer a significant advantage over the i.m. route, and no difference was detected by delivery to one site versus splitting the dose between two sites for i.d. vaccine administration. The 4-mg dose (i.m) was further investigated in prime-boost regimens.
Asunto(s)
Glicoproteínas Hemaglutininas del Virus de la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas de ADN/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Citocinas/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Ensayo de Immunospot Ligado a Enzimas , Femenino , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Glicoproteínas Hemaglutininas del Virus de la Influenza/genética , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/genética , Inyecciones Intradérmicas , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Neutralización , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunas de ADN/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Ebola virus causes irregular outbreaks of severe hemorrhagic fever in equatorial Africa. Case mortality remains high; there is no effective treatment and outbreaks are sporadic and unpredictable. Studies of Ebola virus vaccine platforms in non-human primates have established that the induction of protective immunity is possible and safety and human immunogenicity has been demonstrated in a previous Phase I clinical trial of a 1st generation Ebola DNA vaccine. We now report the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) vaccine encoding the envelope glycoprotein (GP) from the Zaire and Sudan Ebola virus species, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, dose escalation, Phase I human study. Thirty-one healthy adults received vaccine at 2×10(9) (n=12), or 2×10(10) (n=11) viral particles or placebo (n=8) as an intramuscular injection. Antibody responses were assessed by ELISA and neutralizing assays; and T cell responses were assessed by ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining assays. This recombinant Ebola virus vaccine was safe and subjects developed antigen specific humoral and cellular immune responses.
Asunto(s)
Adenovirus Humanos/genética , Vacunas contra el Virus del Ébola/inmunología , Vectores Genéticos , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Citocinas/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Vacunas contra el Virus del Ébola/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra el Virus del Ébola/genética , Ebolavirus/genética , Ebolavirus/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Neutralización , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas/genética , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Early bactericidal activity (EBA) of antituberculosis drugs is the rate of decrease in the concentration of tubercle bacilli sputum during the initial days of therapy. The study reported here was designed to optimize the methodology for obtaining precise EBA measurements. The study compared the results with two versus five treatment days; overnight sputum collections with early morning collections; and quantitative smears for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) with quantitative cultures. Isoniazid (INH) was used as a model drug. Among 28 smear-positive patients enrolled in the study in five cities in the United States, 16 were evaluable (INH-susceptible tuberculosis [TB] and adequate sputum collections). The mean baseline bacterial load was 6.69 log10 cfu/ml (SE = 0.24). Quantitative culture of 10- or 12-h sputum collections obtained on two baseline days and treatment Day 5 was the optimal method for EBA measurement. The mean 5-d EBA was 0.21 log10 cfu/ml/d (SE = 0.03; p < 0.001) and the EBA appeared to be constant during the first five treatment days. On the basis of these data, multiarm studies of investigational drugs will require 25 evaluable subjects per arm to detect (80% power and two-tailed alpha of 0.05) an EBA at least 50% as large as the EBA of INH. In countries with a low incidence of TB, the usefulness of this methodology for rapidly assessing new antituberculosis agents may be limited by the relatively large number of subjects required to compare EBA values across treatment arms.
Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos/administración & dosificación , Isoniazida/administración & dosificación , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antituberculosos/farmacocinética , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Isoniazida/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Esputo/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/microbiologíaRESUMEN
This randomized, open-labeled, multicenter study was designed to assess safety and pharmacokinetics of dronabinol (Marinol) tablets and megestrol acetate (Megace) micronized tablets, alone and in combination, for treatment of HIV wasting syndrome. Weight and quality of life data were also collected. Fifty-two patients (mean CD4+ count, 59 cells/microliter) were randomized to one of four treatment arms: dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (D); megestrol acetate 750 mg/day (M750); megestrol acetate 750 mg/day+dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (M750+D); or megestrol acetate 250 mg/day+dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (M250+D). After therapy initiation, 47 patients returned for at least one visit, and 39 completed the planned 12 weeks of study visits. Occurrence of adverse events, drug discontinuation, new AIDS-defining conditions, or CD4+ T lymphocyte changes were not statistically significantly different among arms. Serious adverse events assessed as related to dronabinol included CNS events (e.g., confusion, anxiety, emotional lability, euphoria, hallucinations) and those assessed as related to megestrol acetate included dyspnea, liver enzyme changes, and hyperglycemia. The mean weight change +/- SE over 12 weeks was as follows: D, -2.0 +/- 1.3 kg; M750, +6.5 +/- 1.1 kg; M750+D, +6.0 +/- 1.0 kg; and M250+D, -0.3 +/- 1.0 kg (difference among treatment arms, p = 0.0001). Pharmacokinetic parameters measured after 2 weeks of therapy for M750 were Cmax = 985 ng/ml and AUC = 22,487 ng x hr/ml, and for dronabinol and its active metabolite (HO-THC), respectively, were Cmax = 2.01; 4.61 ng/ml and AUC = 5.3; 23.7 ng x hr/ml. For megestrol acetate, but not dronabinol, there was a positive correlation at week 2 between both Cmax and AUC with each of the following: (1) weight change, (2) breakfast visual analog scale for hunger (VASH) score, and (3) dinner VASH score.