Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 182: 260-266.e4, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27989407

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a family-based intervention targeting both smoking fathers and nonsmoking mothers in well-child health clinics is effective in increasing fathers' abstinence from cigarette smoking. STUDY DESIGN: This parallel 2-arm randomized controlled trial recruited a total of 1158 families with a daily-smoking father, a nonsmoking mother, and a child aged 0-18 months from the 22 maternal and child health centers in Hong Kong. The intervention group received the family-based intervention, including 6 nurse-led individual face-to-face and telephone counseling sessions within 1 month after recruitment and a voluntary face-to-face family counseling session (FCS). The control group received a leaflet, a self-help booklet, and brief quitting advice only. Father-reported 7-day and 6-month abstinence, smoking reduction, quit attempts, mother-reported help and support, and child salivary cotinine level were assessed at 12 months. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare these outcomes between the 2 study groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the intervention group reported a greater prevalence of 7-day (13.7% vs 8.0%; OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.16-3.17; P < .01) and 6-month self-reported abstinence (13.4% vs. 7.5%; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.30-3.40; P < .01). Within the intervention group, compared with receipt of individual counseling only, participation in the FCS was associated with increases in fathers' self-reported abstinence (20.2% vs 12.3%; P = .02), mothers' help (66.1% vs 43.8%; P < .01), and support to the fathers (55.0% vs 45.4%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The family-based smoking cessation intervention for the families in the well-child healthcare setting was effective in increasing the fathers' self-reported abstinence. Additional participation in the FCS increased mothers' help and support to the fathers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-trials.com: ISRCTN99111655; Hkuctr.com: HKUCTR-465.


Asunto(s)
Cotinina/análisis , Padres/educación , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Fumar/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Adulto , Consejo/métodos , Padre/educación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Promoción de la Salud , Hong Kong , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Madres/educación , Medición de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos
2.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 901, 2014 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25179871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine whether exposure to a peer-led intervention focused on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, physical activity, and multi-vitamin intake can lead to increased intentions to be screened for CRC once age eligible among adults under the age of 50. METHODS: Participants were residents of low-income housing sites, and CRC screening intentions were assessed at baseline and at follow-up (approximately 2 years later) to determine changes in screening intentions and factors associated with changes in intentions. RESULTS: Participants (n = 692) were 78.4% female, 42.6% Hispanic and 50.8% black. At follow-up, 51% maintained their intention to be screened and 14.6% newly intended to get screened. Individuals newly intending to get screened were more likely to have participated in the intervention, be older, male, and born in Puerto Rico or the United States compared to those who maintained their intention not to get screened (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Exposure to CRC prevention messages before the age of 50 can increase screening intentions among individuals who did not initially intend to get screened. Peer-led interventions to promote CRC screening should include individual less than 50 years of age, as this may contribute to increased screening at the recommended age threshold.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Intención , Tamizaje Masivo , Adolescente , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Puerto Rico , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
3.
J Urban Health ; 88(1): 14-29, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21274646

RESUMEN

Building-level characteristics are structural factors largely beyond the control of those who live in them. We explored whether building-level characteristics and indoor allergens in the household are related. We examined the relationship between building-level characteristics and indoor allergens: dust mite, cat, cockroach, and mouse. Building-level characteristics measured were presence of pests (seeing cockroaches and rodents), building type (public housing, buildings zoned commercially and residentially, and building size), and building condition (building age and violations). Allergen cutpoints were used for categorical analyses and defined as follows: dust mite: >0.25 µg/g; cat: >1 µg/g; cockroach: >1 U/g; mouse: >1.6 µg/g. In fully adjusted linear analyses, neither dust mite nor cat allergen were statistically significantly associated with any building-level characteristics. Cockroach allergen was associated with the presence of cockroaches (2.07; 95% CI, 1.23, 3.49) and living in public housing (2.14; 95% CI, 1.07, 4.31). Mouse allergen was associated with the presence of rodents (1.70; 95% CI, 1.29, 2.23), and building size: living in a low-rise (<8 floors; 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42, 0.87) or high-rise (8 + floors; 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.88; compared with house/duplex). In fully adjusted logistic analyses, cat allergen was statistically significantly associated with living in a high-rise (6.29; 95% CI, 1.51, 26.21; compared with a house/duplex). Mouse allergen was associated with living in public housing (6.20; 95% CI, 1.01, 37.95) and building size: living in a low-rise (0.16; 95% CI, 0.05, 0.52) or high-rise (0.06; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.50; compared with a house/duplex). Issues concerning building size and public housing may be particularly critical factors in reducing asthma morbidity. We suggest that future research explore the possible improvement of these factors through changes to building code and violations adherence, design standards, and incentives for landlords.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Vivienda Popular/estadística & datos numéricos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Asma/etiología , Asma/inmunología , Gatos , Intervalos de Confianza , Humanos , Ratones , Periplaneta , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Pyroglyphidae , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA