Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vaccine ; 42(25): 126100, 2024 Nov 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004526

RESUMEN

Cervical cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally with a disproportionate impact on women in low- and middle-income countries. In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) called for increased vaccination, screening, and treatment to eliminate cervical cancer. However, even with widespread rollout of human papillomavirus (HPV) prophylactic vaccines, millions of women who previously acquired HPV infections will remain at risk for progression to cancer for decades to come. The development and licensing of an affordable, accessible therapeutic HPV vaccine, designed to clear or control carcinogenic HPV and/or to induce regression precancer could significantly contribute to the elimination efforts, particularly benefiting those who missed out on the prophylactic vaccine. One barrier to development of such vaccines is clarity around the regulatory pathway for licensure. In Washington, D.C. on September 12-13, 2023, a meeting was convened to provide input and guidance on trial design with associated ethical and regulatory considerations. This report summarizes the discussion and conclusions from the meeting. Expert presentation topics included the current state of research, potential regulatory challenges, WHO preferred product characteristics, modeling results of impact of vaccine implementation, epidemiology and natural history of HPV infection, immune responses related to viral clearance and/or precancer regression including potential biomarkers, and ethical considerations. Panel discussions were held to explore specific trial design recommendations to support the licensure process for two vaccine indications: (1) treatment of prevalent HPV infection or (2) treatment of cervical precancers. Discussion covered inclusion/exclusion criteria, study endpoints, sample size and power, safety, study length, and additional data needed, which are reported here. Further research of HPV natural history is needed to address identified gaps in regulatory guidance, especially for therapeutic vaccines intended to treat existing HPV infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/inmunología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Concesión de Licencias/legislación & jurisprudencia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/inmunología , Papillomavirus Humano 16/patogenicidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia
2.
Gates Open Res ; 8: 14, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035848

RESUMEN

Gene drive technology has been recognized for its potential to provide durable and cost-effective solutions for previously intractable problems in public health, conservation, and agriculture. In recognition of the rapid advances in this field, in 2016 the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine issued a report making several recommendations aimed at researchers, funders, and policymakers for the safe and responsible research and development of gene drive technology. Subsequently, in 2017 sixteen global organizations self-identifying as sponsors and supporters of gene drive research became public signatories committed to the 'Principles for Gene Drive Research' which were inspired by the report's recommendations. Herein we reflect on the progress of gene drive research in relation to the ethical principles laid out and committed to by the signatories to the Principles. Our analysis indicates high levels of alignment with the Principles in the field of gene drive research. The manuscript also discusses the Gene Drive Research Forum, which had its genesis in the publication of the Principles. Discussions between participants at the latest meeting of the Forum point to the work that lies ahead for gene drive research in line with the Principles. Going forward the gene drive research community can productively focus on: i) safety and efficacy criteria for open release, ii) risk assessment frameworks and methods, iii) more downstream technical, regulatory and policy considerations for field evaluations and implementation, iv) continued transparency and developing mechanisms of accountability, and v) strengthening capacity in locales of potential release and expected drive spread.


Asunto(s)
Tecnología de Genética Dirigida , Humanos , Tecnología de Genética Dirigida/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/ética
3.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 29(4): 1453-1461, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38864959

RESUMEN

Many important questions in health professions education require datasets that are built from several sources, in some cases using data collected for a different purpose. In building and maintaining these datasets, project leaders will need to make decisions about the data. While such decisions are often construed as technical, there are several normative concerns, such as who should have access, how the data will be used, how products resulting from the data will be shared, and how to ensure privacy of the individuals the data is about is respected, etc. Establishing a framework for data governance can help project leaders in avoiding problems, related to such matters, that could limit what can be learned from the data or that might put the project (or future projects) at risk. In this paper, we highlight several normative challenges to be addressed when determining a data governance framework. Drawing from lessons in global health, we illustrate three kinds of normative challenges for projects that rely on data from multiple sources or involved partnerships across institutions or jurisdictions: (1) legal and regulatory requirements, (2) consent, and (3) equitable sharing and fair distribution.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Consentimiento Informado/normas , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734009

RESUMEN

Although several countries have adopted a single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination strategy, many other countries continue to include multiple doses in their vaccination programmes. There are ethical reasons to transition to a single-dose strategy. We discuss how a single-dose HPV vaccination strategy advances equity in three dimensions: vaccine equity, health equity, and gender equity. Adopting a single-dose strategy eases pressure on vaccine supply, lowers programme costs, and is easier to distribute. This change facilitates vaccine procurement and implementation programmes (contributing to vaccine equity) and reaching hard to reach people or populations (contributing to health equity). A lower number of cases of HPV-related diseases that stem from greater vaccine distribution reduces the burden on women, who are at a higher risk of HPV-related disease or who act as caregivers, which prevents them from accessing opportunities that contribute to their empowerment (contributing to gender equity). Thus, pursuing the single-dose HPV vaccination programme strategy is ethically desirable.

7.
Recurso Educacional Abierto en Inglés | CVSP - Argentina | ID: oer-1055

RESUMEN

Material en inglés, Access and use of human tissues from the developing world: ethical challenges and a way forward using a tissue trust, que analiza los diferentes desafíos éticos que supone el acceso a tejidos humanos para investigación en un contexto en el que no han estado ausentes la explotación y abuso de ciertas prácticas.


Asunto(s)
Investigación , Investigación Biomédica , Ética Médica
8.
BMC Med Ethics ; 12: 2, 2011 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21266076

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scientists engaged in global health research are increasingly faced with barriers to access and use of human tissues from the developing world communities where much of their research is targeted. In part, the problem can be traced to distrust of researchers from affluent countries, given the history of 'scientific-imperialism' and 'biocolonialism' reflected in past well publicized cases of exploitation of research participants from low to middle income countries. DISCUSSION: To a considerable extent, the failure to adequately engage host communities, the opacity of informed consent, and the lack of fair benefit-sharing have played a significant role in eroding trust. These ethical considerations are central to biomedical research in low to middle income countries and failure to attend to them can inadvertently contribute to exploitation and erode trust. A 'tissue trust' may be a plausible means for enabling access to human tissues for research in a manner that is responsive to the ethical challenges considered. SUMMARY: Preventing exploitation and restoring trust while simultaneously promoting global health research calls for innovative approaches to human tissues research. A tissue trust can reduce the risk of exploitation and promote host capacity as a key benefit.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/ética , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Países en Desarrollo , Consentimiento Informado , Bancos de Tejidos , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/ética , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Bancos de Tejidos/ética , Confianza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA