Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Asian J Anesthesiol ; 56(3): 83-91, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30583330

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The impact of preoperative glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery is unclear as data is limited. METHODS: Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery attending pre-assessment screening (PAS) clinics from August to September 2016 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB) were identifi ed. Outcome measure was postoperative complications as defi ned by the Clavien-Dindo classifi cation system. RESULTS: In this study, 381 patients were included, of which 48% (181/381) had HbA1c measured. Of these, 27% (49/181) had a HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol. Overall complications were 14% and major complication rates were 3% (11/381). In unadjusted models, patients with HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol had signifi cantly higher rates of overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.82, 95% confi dence interval [CI] = 1.22-6.49; p = 0.015). In adjusted models, only surgical grade was predictive of overall complications. In patients undergoing major surgery (n = 93), there were signifi cantly higher rates of overall complications in patients with HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol as compared to those with HbA1c < 48 mmol/mol (63% vs. 46%, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Utility of HbA1c to stratify patients undergoing gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery into high-risk clinics is limited from this study. Future studies should aim to validate these fi ndings in much larger cohorts.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hígado/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Anesthesiol Res Pract ; 2018: 5710641, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29692807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk stratification and optimising care of patients undergoing elective surgery are important to reduce the risk of postoperative outcomes. Renal dysfunction is becoming increasingly prevalent, but its impact on patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery is unknown although much evidence is available for cardiac surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries. METHODS: This prospective study included consecutive adult patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries attending preassessment screening (PAS) clinics at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB) between July and August 2016. Primary outcome measure was 30-day overall complication rates and secondary outcomes were grade of complications, 30-day readmission rates, and postoperative care setting. RESULTS: This study included 370 patients, of which 11% (41/370) had eGFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were more likely to have ASA grade 3/4 (p < 0.001) and >2 comorbidities (p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 15% (54/370), with no significant difference in overall (p=0.644) and major complication rates (p=0.831) between both groups. In adjusted models, only surgery grade was predictive of overall complications. Preoperative eGFR did not impact on overall complications (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.45-1.54; p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative eGFR does not appear to impact on postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries, even when stratified by surgery grade. These findings will help preassessment clinics in risk stratification and optimisation of perioperative care of patients.

3.
J Obes ; 2017: 4285204, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28695007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB), no specific protocol to stratify patients by body mass index (BMI) exists. This study sought to evaluate outcomes following gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery attending preassessment screening clinic (PAS) from August to September 2016 at the QEHB were identified. Primary outcome was postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were major complications and 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: Of 368 patients preassessed, 31% (116/368) were overweight and 35% (130/368) were obese. Median age was 57 (range: 17-93). There was no difference of BMI between the low risk and high risk clinics. Patients in high risk clinic had significantly higher rates of comorbidities, major surgical grades, and malignancy as the indication for surgery. Overall complication rates were 14% (52/368), with 3% (10/368) having major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades III-IV). Whilst BMI was associated with comorbidity (p = 0.03) and ASA grade (p < 0.001), it was not associated with worse outcomes. Patients attending high risk clinic had significantly higher rates of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery grade was found to be an independent risk factor of complication rates. Use of BMI as an independent factor for preassessment level is not justified from our cohort.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA