RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Routine screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study aims to compare cardiac testing rates in patients with end-stage renal disease, referred and not referred for transplantation, and assess the impact of testing on transplant wait times. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 22 687 end-stage renal disease patients from 2011 to 2022, within an integrated health system. Cardiac testing patterns, and the association between cardiac testing and transplant wait times and post-transplant mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 22 687 patients (median age 66 years, 41.1% female), 6.9% received kidney transplants, and 21.0% underwent evaluation. Compared with dialysis patients, transplant patients had a 5.6 times higher rate of stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission (rate ratio (RR) 5.64, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.92), a 6.5 times higher rate of stress echocardiogram (RR 6.51, 95% CI 5.65 to 7.51) and 16% higher cardiac catheterisation (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27). In contrast, revascularisation rates were significantly lower in transplant patients (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.58). Transplant wait times were longer for patients who underwent stress testing (median 474 days with no testing vs 1053 days with testing) and revascularisation (1796 days for percutaneous intervention and 2164 days for coronary artery bypass surgery). No significant association was observed with 1-year post-transplant mortality (adjusted OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.46 to 8.56). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a higher rate of cardiac testing in dialysis patients evaluated for kidney transplants. Cardiac testing was associated with longer transplant wait time, but no association was observed between testing and post-transplant mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: Studies have shown that both home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) and center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) exhibit comparable efficacy in reducing mortality during short-term follow-up periods of up to 12 months. However, research on sex- and race-specific outcomes associated with HBCR is limited. This study examines all-cause mortality and hospital readmission among patients referred to HBCR, with stratification by sex and race. Methods: This Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) retrospective cohort study followed 6,868 patients from HBCR referral until death, disenrollment, or December 31, 2021. There were 3,835 HBCR graduates, 722 non-graduates, and 2,311 non-enrolled patients. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) comparing 1) HBCR graduates vs. non-enrolled, and 2) HBCR graduates vs. non-graduates, stratified by sex and race. Differential outcomes among strata were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Among the 6,868 patients referred to HBCR, 4693 (68.3 %) were male, 2,175 (31.7 %) female, 870 (12.7 %) Asian/Pacific Islander, 731 (10.6 %) African American, 1,612 (23.6 %) Hispanic/Latino, and 3,646 non-Hispanic White (53.1 %). Over a mean follow-up period of 2.28 years, HBCR graduates, compared to patients who did not enroll in HBCR, had overall significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. These results remained significant with stratification by sex and race. Compared to HBCR non-graduates, HBCR graduates overall had significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. In the same comparison, mortality risk was significantly reduced for male and White patients; risk of hospital readmission was significantly reduced in both sexes, African American, and White patients. Among HBCR graduates, no significant differences in all-cause mortality or hospital readmission were observed across sexes and races. Conclusion: HBCR participation is associated with reduction of all-cause mortality and hospital readmission rates across sexes and races. Notably, we observed benefits at varying levels of engagement, which suggests that even partial completion of HBCR is associated with risk reduction. Among HBCR graduates, we found similar outcomes across sexes and races, which suggests that the program can be effective among diverse patient groups.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The cardioprotective effects of intensive lifestyle regimens in primary prevention have been elucidated; however, there is a paucity of data comparing the effects of different lifestyle regimens in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent, specifically vis-à-vis carotid plaque regression. METHODS: We performed a randomized, single-center, single-blind study in 120 patients with established CAD. Patients were randomly assigned to either 9 months of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP), an outpatient lifestyle enrichment program that focuses on improving dietary choices, enhancing daily exercise, increasing support systems, and decreasing stress; or to 9 months of an ad hoc, nonsequential combination of various healthy living classes offered separately through a health maintenance organization and referred to as the Healthy Heart program. Baseline and 9-month change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) were measured. RESULTS: Among 120 participants, data were analyzed for 79, of which 68 (86%) completed the study. Both average CIMT and average maximum CIMT increased over 9 months, but the changes between groups were insignificant. There were marked differences in the mean body mass index favoring the CHIP group (-1.9 [standard deviation = 1.9]; p < 0.001) and statistically significant within-group improvements in blood pressure, triglyceride level, 6-minute walk test result, self-assessment well-being score, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score that were not observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Neither the CHIP nor Healthy Heart was effective in inducing plaque regression in patients with established CAD after a 9-month period. However, both were effective in improving several CAD risk factors, which shows that the nonsequential offering of healthy lifestyle programs can lead to similar outcomes as a formal, sequential, established program (CHIP) in many aspects. These results have important implications as to how lifestyle changes will be implemented as tertiary prevention measures in the future.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have been shown to significantly reduce restenosis in the treatment of lesions in large coronary arteries. We assessed and compared the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of patients treated with SES and bare-metal stents (BMS) for small coronary artery disease. METHODS: We compared 448 patients who underwent SES implantation in small coronary arteries (<2.5mm) with patients who received conventional BMS (n=124). In-hospital and nine-month events were evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of angiographic restenosis at nine months was significantly lower in the SES group (1.6% vs 9.9%, P<0.001) than in the BMS group. The overall rate of MACE was 4.3% in SES and 13.9% in BMS groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with BMS, SES placement in small coronary arteries is effective and associated with a marked reduction in restenosis rate and the subsequent need for target lesion revascularization at nine months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Previous randomized trials have addressed the impact of gender on outcomes, showing worse results in women assigned to invasive strategies compared with men with non-ST-elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there is still a significant amount of controversy on strategies of treatment on the basis of gender. This study evaluated the impact of gender on treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with NSTE ACS in a high-volume, single-site tertiary center. We identified 1,197 consecutive patients with NSTE ACS (381 women, 816 men) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention during their index hospitalizations. Patients were stratified by gender and baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, and in-hospital and 9-month clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. There were clear differences in baseline characteristics between men and women with ACS at presentation. Women were, on average, slightly older than men, with more hypertension and morbid obesity, but there were no differences in racial backgrounds or the prevalence of diabetes or dyslipidemia, nor were there treatment disparities in pharmacologic interventions. Women and men with ACS had similar rates of percutaneous coronary intervention on index admission. Women had a greater incidence of bleeding complications requiring blood transfusions. Overall, in-hospital and 9-month event-free survival were equivalent for the 2 genders. In conclusion, in this single-site observational study, patients with NSTE ACS who underwent angiography followed by percutaneous coronary intervention demonstrated no significant gender differences in treatment or in-hospital or 9-month event-free survival. From these results, interventional strategies should not be based on gender.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)