Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 55(3): 293-295, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27665498

RESUMEN

Anastomoses in the neck between the sensory transverse cervical nerve (C2,3) and the cervical branch of the facial nerve are common, but communications with more superior branches of the facial nerve are rare. After we had identified a case where the transverse cervical nerve joined the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in the submandibular triangle during a selective neck dissection, we searched for this variant in 86 neck dissections to see if it occurs more often than expected. We found it in one further patient. As this anastomosis of the nerve could easily be confused with the marginal mandibular branch itself, particularly during a more limited exposure (such as excision of a submandibular gland), our findings remind surgeons to be vigilant when dissecting in this area to minimise the risk of weakness of the lower lip postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Cervical/anomalías , Nervio Mandibular/anomalías , Anomalías Múltiples/epidemiología , Humanos , Disección del Cuello
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 128(9): 791-6, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25166627

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop an algorithm for selecting the optimal endoscopic approach for benign sphenoid lesions. METHODS: Charts of 392 patients were reviewed and categorised according to disease nature and extent as follows: group 1 comprised isolated sphenoid sinus lesion cases, group 2 consisted of pansinus lesion cases and group 3 comprised lateral sphenoid recess lesion cases. Surgical approaches, difficulties and complications were noted. RESULTS: A transnasal approach was employed in 40.8 per cent of cases (23.2 per cent were group 1 patients, 16.1 per cent were group 2 patients and 1.5 per cent were group 3 patients), a transethmoidal approach was utilised in 54.3 per cent of cases (group 2 patients) and a transpterygopalatine fossa approach was selected in 4.9 per cent of cases (group 3 patients). Surgical difficulties were encountered in 11.9, 10.8 and 0 per cent of patients in whom transnasal, transethmoidal or transpterygopalatine approaches were utilised, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radio-pathological categorisation provided a means of developing an algorithm for selecting the most appropriate endoscopic approach. Transnasal sphenoidotomy should be the first choice of approach whenever applicable. Lateral sphenoid recess non-inflammatory diseases should be managed through a transpterygopalatine fossa approach. Revision surgery does not play a key role in the algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Seno Esfenoidal/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de los Senos Paranasales/patología , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seno Esfenoidal/anatomía & histología , Seno Esfenoidal/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA