RESUMEN

Restoration of the p53 pathway has been a long-term goal in the field of cancer research to treat tumors with mutated p53 and aggressive clinical behavior. p53 pathway restoration in p53-deficient cancers can be achieved by small molecules via p53-dependent or p53-independent processes. Hereafter p53-independent restoration of p53-pathway-signaling in p53-deficient/mutated tumors is referred to as 'restoration of the p53 pathway'. We compare activation of p53 target genes by novel compounds PG3 and PG3-Oc, that activate p53-target genes in a p53-independent manner, and four mutant p53-activating compounds while Nutlin-3a is used as negative control. PG3 and PG3-Oc upregulate p21, PUMA, and DR5 in five cancer cell lines with various p53 mutational statuses through ATF4 (Activating Transcriptional Factor 4) and integrated stress response (ISR) independent of p53. Mutant p53-targeting compounds induce expression of the 3 major downstream p53 target genes and ATF4 in a highly variable and cell-type-dependent manner. PG3 treatment activates ATF4 through ISR via kinase HRI (Heme-Regulated Inhibitor). ATF4 mediates upregulation of PUMA, p21, and NAG-1/GDF15 (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene 1). We note that PUMA mediates apoptosis through activation of caspase-8 in HT29 cells and potentially caspase-10 in SW480 cells. We provide a novel mechanism engaged by PG3 to induce cell death via the HRI/ATF4/PUMA axis. Our results provide unique insights into the mechanism of action of PG3 as a novel cancer therapeutic targeting p53 pathway-like tumor suppression.

Asunto(s)

Apoptosis , Transducción de Señal , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor , Humanos , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patología , Factor de Transcripción Activador 4/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción Activador 4/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/metabolismo , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis/genética , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer (PCa) neuroendocrine tumor (NET)-like cells with low or absent androgen receptor (AR) signaling cause hormone therapy resistance and poor prognosis. Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), a high-grade NET, presents with metastasis early and has poor survival. ONC201/TIC10 is a first-in-class cancer therapeutic with clinical activity in diffuse gliomas and neuroendocrine tumors. We hypothesized that markers of neuroendocrine differentiation, activation of the integrated stress response (ISR) and the TRAIL pathway, as well as the expression of ClpP, contribute to neuroendocrine tumor cell death and sensitivity to ONC201. We show that PCa and SCLC cell lines (N=6) are sensitive to ONC201, regardless of the extent of neuroendocrine differentiation. Endogenous levels of some NET markers (CgA, FoxO1, ENO2, PGP9.5, SOX2) are present in a spectrum in PCa and SCLC cell lines. Overexpression of neural transcription factor BRN2 in DU145 PCa cells does not increase expression of NET differentiation markers FoxO1, ENO2, PGP9.5, and CgA at 48 hours. However, the transient BRN2 overexpression showed slight decreases in some NET markers on the spectrum while maintaining sensitivity of PCa cells to ONC201 before any phenotypic change related to NET differentiation. Our results show that ONC201 has preclinical activity against PCa including those without NET markers or in PCa cells with transient overexpression of neural transcription factor BRN2. Our results have relevance to activity of ONC201 in PCa where most castrate-resistant androgen-independent cancers are not therapy resistant due to NET differentiation. Importantly, NET differentiation does not promote resistance to ONC201 supporting further clinical investigations across the spectrum of PCa.

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause death from cancer in men worldwide. Approximately 30% of castrate-resistant PCa's become refractory to therapy due to neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) that is present in <1% of androgen-sensitive tumors. First-in-class imipridone ONC201/TIC10 has shown clinical activity against midline gliomas, neuroendocrine tumors and PCa. We explored the question of whether NED promotes sensitivity to imipridones ONC201 and ONC206 by inducible overexpression of SOX2 and BRN2, well-known neuroendocrine drivers, in human PCa cell lines DU145 or LNCaP. Slight protection from ONC201 or ONC206 with SOX2 and BRN2 overexpression was observed in the inducible LNCaP cells but not in the DU145 cells. At 2 months, there was an apparent increase in CLpP expression in LNCaP SOX2-overexpressing cells but this did not confer enhanced sensitivity to ONC201. DU145 SOX2-overexpressing cells had a significantly reduced ONC201 sensitivity than DU145 control cells. The results support the idea that treatment of castrate-resistant prostate cancer by imipridones may not be significantly impacted by neuroendocrine differentiation as a therapy-resistance mechanism. The results support further testing of imipridones across subtypes of androgen-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

RESUMEN

Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death that is mediated by intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. Dysregulation of and resistance to cell death are hallmarks of cancer. For over three decades, the development of therapies to promote treatment of cancer by inducing various cell death modalities, including apoptosis, has been a main goal of clinical oncology. Apoptosis pathways also interact with other signaling mechanisms, such as the p53 signaling pathway and the integrated stress response (ISR) pathway. In addition to agents directly targeting the intrinsic and extrinsic pathway components, anticancer drugs that target the p53 and ISR signaling pathways are actively being developed. In this Review, we discuss selected and promising anticancer therapies in various stages of development, including drug targets, mechanisms, and resistance to related treatments, focusing especially on B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors, TRAIL analogues, DR5 antibodies, and strategies that target p53, mutant p53, and the ISR.

Asunto(s)

Apoptosis , Neoplasias , Transducción de Señal , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/genética , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/genética

RESUMEN

Single-agent TAS102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) and regorafenib are FDA-approved treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We previously reported that regorafenib combined with a fluoropyrimidine can delay disease progression in clinical case reports of multidrug-resistant mCRC patients. We hypothesized that the combination of TAS102 and regorafenib may be active in CRC and other gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and may in the future provide a treatment option for patients with advanced GI cancer. We investigated the therapeutic effect of TAS102 in combination with regorafenib in preclinical studies employing cell culture, colonosphere assays that enrich for cancer stem cells, and in vivo. TAS102 in combination with regorafenib has synergistic activity against multiple GI cancers in vitro including colorectal and gastric cancer, but not liver cancer cells. TAS102 inhibits colonosphere formation and this effect is potentiated by regorafenib. In vivo anti-tumor effects of TAS102 plus regorafenib appear to be due to anti-proliferative effects, necrosis and angiogenesis inhibition. Growth inhibition by TAS102 plus regorafenib occurs in xenografted tumors regardless of p53, KRAS or BRAF mutations, although more potent tumor suppression was observed with wild-type p53. Regorafenib significantly inhibits TAS102-induced angiogenesis and microvessel density in xenografted tumors, as well inhibits TAS102-induced ERK1/2 activation regardless of RAS or BRAF status in vivo. TAS102 plus regorafenib is a synergistic drug combination in preclinical models of GI cancer, with regorafenib suppressing TAS102-induced increase in microvessel density and p-ERK as contributing mechanisms. The TAS102 plus regorafenib drug combination may be further tested in gastric and other GI cancers.

Asunto(s)

Combinación de Medicamentos , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Mutación , Células Madre Neoplásicas , Neovascularización Patológica , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Piridinas , Pirrolidinas , Factor de Transcripción STAT3 , Timina , Trifluridina , Uracilo , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Humanos , Trifluridina/farmacología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacología , Animales , Piridinas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/metabolismo , Neovascularización Patológica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Patológica/genética , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/metabolismo , Uracilo/farmacología , Uracilo/análogos & derivados , Ratones , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/genética , Timina/farmacología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Pirrolidinas/farmacología , Pirrolidinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Angiogénesis

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: TROP2 (TACSTD2) expression is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) in some solid tumors, and the TROP2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan has been approved in breast and urothelial carcinomas. We aimed to explore the multi-omic landscape associated with TACSTD2 gene expression in various solid tumors to identify patients most likely to benefit from this approach. METHODS: Breast (N = 11 246), colorectal (N = 15 425), hepatocellular (N = 433), pancreatic (N = 5488), and urothelial (N = 4125) tumors were stratified into quartiles by TACSTD2 gene expression, analyzed by next-generation DNA sequencing, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Survival data were obtained from insurance claims, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for molecularly defined cohorts. RESULTS: Several pathogenic mutations were associated with TACSTD2-high tumors, including TP53 in breast, colorectal (CRC), pancreatic, and hepatocellular cancers; KRAS in pancreatic and CRC cancers; ARID1A and FGFR3 in urothelial cancer; and CTNNB1 in hepatocellular cancer. TACSTD2-low breast tumors were enriched for copy number amplifications in CCND1 and FGF/R family member genes. TACSTD2 high was generally associated with more immune cell infiltration and greater T-cell inflammation scores. Patients with TACSTD2-high breast, CRC, and pancreatic cancers demonstrated a significantly shorter OS than TACSTD2-low tumors. This was restricted to CRC with microsatellite stable tumors and patients with pancreatic cancer with KRAS-mutant tumors. Patients with breast cancer with TACSTD2-high tumors also experienced significantly worse OS following immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: TACSTD2 expression is associated with key driver alterations and a more active immune microenvironment, suggesting possible combinatorial strategies with TROP2-targeting ADCs plus immunotherapy in various solid tumors.

RESUMEN

ONC201 (originally discovered as TRAIL-Inducing Compound #10 or TIC10) and analogue ONC206 have been found to induce an integrated stress response with suggested primary targets and mechanisms involving targeting mitochondrial protein ClpP and antagonism of dopamine receptors D2/3 (DRD2/3). We hypothesized that dopamine, the agonist of DRD2, may counteract ONC201 or ONC206 for DRD2/3 and impair the anti-cancer effect of ONC201 or ONC206, thus protect the tumor cells from the cytotoxic effect of ONC201 or ONC206. We therefore pre-treated cancer cells from different tissue origins including breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, and diffuse midline glioma (DMG) with dopamine, followed by treatment of ONC201, ONC206 or ONC212. We observed that 48 hours of pre-treatment with dopamine impaired the cell viability suppression effect of ONC201, ONC206 and ONC212 in pancreatic cancer cells and colorectal cancer cells. We pre-treated multiple cancer cell lines with dopamine for one week followed by ONC201, ONC206, or ONC212 treatment and performed colony assays. Pre-treatment with dopamine impaired the anti-cancer effect of ONC201 or ONC206 in pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Impairment of ONC212 effect by pre-treatment with dopamine was also seen in colony assay for colorectal cancer, but not in pancreatic cancer cells by colony assay. No protection from killing by imipridones was observed with DRD2 agonist sumanirole in tumor cells, or with brain tumor cell lines pretreated with dopamine. Immunoblotting was conducted to investigate whether dopamine pre-treatment impacts signaling pathways reported to be affected by ONC201. The dopamine pre-treatment did not impact changes in ATF4, CHOP, DR5 and ClpX which were reported to be affected by ONC201. The mechanism of impairment of ONC201/206/212 effect caused by dopamine pre-treatment appears to involve upregulation of anti-apoptotic p-Bad, XIAP, FLIP and pAkt. Our results shed light on mechanisms of cancer cell protection by dopamine after imipridone treatment, heterogeneity among different tumor cell types, and suggest that effects of dopamine adaptation on tumor cells may impact on cell survival pathways in ways that may or may not depend on expression of dopamine receptors.

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and COVID-19 infection has led to worsened outcomes for patients with cancer. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mediates host cell infection and cell-cell fusion that causes stabilization of tumor suppressor p53 protein. In-silico analysis previously suggested that SARS-CoV-2 spike interacts with p53 directly but this putative interaction has not been demonstrated in cells. We examined the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike, p53 and MDM2 (E3 ligase, which mediates p53 degradation) in cancer cells using an immunoprecipitation assay. We observed that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interrupts p53-MDM2 protein interaction but did not detect SARS-CoV-2 spike bound with p53 protein in the cancer cells. We further observed that SARS-CoV-2 spike suppresses p53 transcriptional activity in cancer cells including after nutlin exposure of wild-type p53-, spike-expressing tumor cells and inhibits chemotherapy-induced p53 gene activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2. The suppressive effect of SARS-CoV-2 spike on p53-dependent gene activation provides a potential molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact tumorigenesis, tumor progression and chemotherapy sensitivity. In fact, cisplatin-treated tumor cells expressing spike were found to have increased cell viability as compared to control cells. Further observations on γ-H2AX expression in spike-expressing cells treated with cisplatin may indicate altered DNA damage sensing in the DNA damage response pathway. The preliminary observations reported here warrant further studies to unravel the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its various encoded proteins including spike on pathways of tumorigenesis and response to cancer therapeutics. More efforts should be directed at studying the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike and other viral proteins on host DNA damage sensing, response and repair mechanisms. A goal would be to understand the structural basis for maximal anti-viral immunity while minimizing suppression of host defenses including the p53 DNA damage response and tumor suppression pathway. Such directions are relevant and important including not only in the context of viral infection and mRNA vaccines in general but also for patients with cancer who may be receiving cytotoxic or other cancer treatments.

Asunto(s)

Supervivencia Celular , Inhibidor p21 de las Quinasas Dependientes de la Ciclina , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-mdm2 , Receptores del Ligando Inductor de Apoptosis Relacionado con TNF , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor , Humanos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-mdm2/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Inhibidor p21 de las Quinasas Dependientes de la Ciclina/metabolismo , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores del Ligando Inductor de Apoptosis Relacionado con TNF/metabolismo , Receptores del Ligando Inductor de Apoptosis Relacionado con TNF/genética , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Transfección , COVID-19/virología , COVID-19/metabolismo

RESUMEN

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors alone, or in combination with chemotherapy failed to provide meaningful clinical activity for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). ONC201 is a small molecule that inactivates AKT and ERK signaling and actives the TRAIL pathway. Preclinical studies indicated potential benefits of combining ONC201 with checkpoint inhibitors. This is a phase Ib/II trial of ONC201 plus nivolumab for patient with MSS CRC who progressed on standard treatment. Methods: Enrolled patients received ONC201 plus nivolumab in a dose de-escalation fashion to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose-expansion cohort. ONC201 at a dose of 625 mg was given orally at day -7 of cycle 1, followed by weekly dosing. Nivolumab was given every 2 weeks at 240 mg IV starting on day 1 of every cycle (cycle =28 days). The primary end point was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the observation window (run-in dose day -7, cycle 1 to assessment pre-dosing cycle 2). The plan was to enroll 28 additional patients at the MTD so that a total of 34 patients would be treated at the MTD. Pharmacokinetics (PKs) and tumor biopsies were collected at several time points per study protocol. Results: A total of 13 patients (8 patients in the dose escalation *6 evaluable*) were enrolled between December 4, 2019 and March 2021. All patients had received ≥2 previous lines of chemotherapy and had confirmed microsatellite stability or mismatch repair-proficient tumors. No DLTs were observed with 625 mg ONC201 in the first three patients. Three additional patients were enrolled at the same dose to confirm safety. Two patients progressed during the DLT period and had to be replaced. During the dose-expansion part, five patients were enrolled and none required dose reduction or modification. No objective tumor response was observed in the 13 treated patients. Disease progression was confirmed at the time of the first imaging evaluation at 8 weeks following cycle 2. Post discussion at the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) on May 25, 2021, the principal investigator (PI) and Committee voted to close the study to new patient enrollment prior to reaching accrual of 34 patients, secondary to lack of efficacy. Conclusions: In this study of patients with advanced MSS CRC, combination ONC201/nivolumab was well-tolerated; objective responses to ONC201/nivolumab were not observed.

RESUMEN

Oncogenic drivers such as KRAS extensively modulate the tumor inflammatory microenvironment (TIME) of colorectal cancer (CRC). The influence of KRAS on modulating immune cell composition remains unclear. The objective of this study was to identify signatures of infiltrative immune cells and distinctive patterns that differ between RAS wild-type (WT) and oncogenic mutant (MT) CRC that explain immune evasion in MT tumors. A total of 7,801 CRC specimens were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and/or whole transcriptome sequencing. Deficiency of mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were also assessed. KRAS mutations were present in 48% of CRC, similarly distributed in patients younger than vs. 50 years and older. In microsatellite stable (MSS) KRAS MT tumors, composition of the TIME included higher neutrophil infiltration and lower infiltration of B cells. MSI-H/dMMR was significantly more prevalent in RAS WT (9.1%) than in KRAS MT (2.9%) CRC. In MSS CRC, TMB-high cases were significantly higher in RAS MT (3.1%) than in RAS WT (2.1%) tumors. KRAS and NRAS mutations are associated with increased neutrophil infiltration, with codon-specific differences. These results demonstrate significant differences in the TIME of RAS mutant CRC that match previous reports of immunoevasive characteristics of such tumors.

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in males. The pathology review of PCa is crucial for clinical decision-making, but traditional pathology review is labor intensive and subjective to some extent. Digital pathology and whole-slide imaging enable the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology. This review highlights the success of AI in detecting and grading PCa, predicting patient outcomes, and identifying molecular subtypes. We propose that AI-based methods could collaborate with pathologists to reduce workload and assist clinicians in formulating treatment recommendations. We also introduce the general process and challenges in developing AI pathology models for PCa. Importantly, we summarize publicly available datasets and open-source codes to facilitate the utilization of existing data and the comparison of the performance of different models to improve future studies.

Asunto(s)

Inteligencia Artificial , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas

RESUMEN

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand (PD-1/L1) have expanded the treatment landscape against cancers but are effective in only a subset of patients. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is postulated to be a generic determinant of ICI-dependent tumor rejection. Here we describe the association between TMB and survival outcomes among microsatellite-stable cancers in a real-world clinicogenomic cohort consisting of 70,698 patients distributed across 27 histologies. TMB was associated with survival benefit or detriment depending on tissue and treatment context, with eight cancer types demonstrating a specific association between TMB and improved outcomes upon treatment with anti-PD-1/L1 therapies. Survival benefits were noted over a broad range of TMB cutoffs across cancer types, and a dose-dependent relationship between TMB and outcomes was observed in a subset of cancers. These results have implications for the use of cancer-agnostic and universal TMB cutoffs to guide the use of anti-PD-1/L1 therapies, and they underline the importance of tissue context in the development of ICI biomarkers.

Asunto(s)

Antígeno B7-H1 , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Mutación , Neoplasias , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Humanos , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Femenino , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Masculino

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer (CRC) and breast cancer (BC) are deadly diseases that rank as the second and fourth leading causes of cancer-related deaths, respectively. We have previously shown that miR-6883 targets CDK4/6 and that palbociclib-mediated CDK4/6 inhibition destabilizes HIF1α. We hypothesize that miR-6883 downregulates HIF1α in CRC and BC cells. miR-6883 was transfected into cells under normoxia or hypoxia and western blot analysis revealed that miR-6883 downregulates CDK4/6 and HIF1α in CRC and BC cells, pointing to miR-6883 as a promising therapeutic to target hypoxic tumors or HIF1α-deregulated cancer cells. Future studies will further investigate miR-6883 as a cancer biomarker, effects on HIF-related proteins, and therapeutic uses in vivo .

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Natural killer (NK) cells are non-antigen specific innate immune cells that can be redirected to targets of interest using multiple strategies, although none are currently FDA-approved. We sought to evaluate NK cell infiltration into tumors to develop an improved understanding of which histologies may be most amenable to NK cell-based therapies currently in the developmental pipeline. METHODS: DNA (targeted/whole-exome) and RNA (whole-transcriptome) sequencing was performed from tumors from 45 cancer types (N = 90,916 for all cancers and N = 3365 for prostate cancer) submitted to Caris Life Sciences. NK cell fractions and immune deconvolution were inferred from RNA-seq data using quanTIseq. Real-world overall survival (OS) and treatment status was determined and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Statistical significance was determined using X2 and Mann-Whitney U tests, with corrections for multiple comparisons where appropriate. RESULTS: In both a pan-tumor and prostate cancer (PCa) -specific setting, we demonstrated that NK cells represent a substantial proportion of the total cellular infiltrate (median range 2-9% for all tumors). Higher NK cell infiltration was associated with improved OS in 28 of 45 cancer types, including (PCa). NK cell infiltration was negatively correlated with common driver mutations and androgen receptor variants (AR-V7) in primary prostate biopsies, while positively correlated with negative immune regulators. Higher levels of NK cell infiltration were associated with patterns consistent with a compensatory anti-inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: Using the largest available dataset to date, we demonstrated that NK cells infiltrate a broad range of tumors, including both primary and metastatic PCa. NK cell infiltration is associated with improved PCa patient outcomes. This study demonstrates that NK cells are capable of trafficking to both primary and metastatic PCa and are a viable option for immunotherapy approaches moving forward. Future development of strategies to enhance tumor-infiltrating NK cell-mediated cytolytic activity and activation while limiting inhibitory pathways will be key.

RESUMEN

Advancements in cutting-edge molecular profiling techniques, such as next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analytic tools, have allowed researchers to examine tumour biology in detail and stratify patients based on factors linked with clinical outcome and response to therapy. This manuscript highlights the most relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers in kidney, bladder, prostate and testicular cancers with recognised impact in clinical practice. In bladder and prostate cancer, new genetic acquisitions concerning the biology of tumours have modified the therapeutic scenario and led to the approval of target directed therapies, increasing the quality of patient care. Thus, it has become of paramount importance to choose adequate molecular tests, i.e., FGFR screening for urothelial cancer and BRCA1-2 alterations for prostate cancer, to guide the treatment plan for patients. While no tissue or blood-based biomarkers are currently used in routine clinical practice for renal cell carcinoma and testicular cancers, the field is quickly expanding. In kidney tumours, gene expression signatures might be the key to identify patients who will respond better to immunotherapy or anti-angiogenic drugs. In testicular germ cell tumours, the use of microRNA has outperformed conventional serum biomarkers in the diagnosis of primary tumours, prediction of chemoresistance, follow-up monitoring, and relapse prediction.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Neoplasias Testiculares , Neoplasias Urológicas , Masculino , Humanos , Pronóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética

RESUMEN

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis. Novel chemotherapeutics in pancreatic cancer have shown limited success, illustrating the urgent need for new treatments. Lurbinectedin (PM01183; LY-01017) received FDA approval in 2020 for metastatic small cell lung cancer on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and is currently undergoing clinical trials in a variety of tumor types. Lurbinectedin stalls and degrades RNA Polymerase II and introduces breaks in DNA, causing subsequent apoptosis. We now demonstrate lurbinectedin's highly efficient killing of human-derived pancreatic tumor cell lines PANC-1, BxPC-3, and HPAF-II as a single agent. We further demonstrate that a combination of lurbinectedin and irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor with FDA approval for advanced pancreatic cancer, results in the synergistic killing of pancreatic tumor cells. Western blot analysis of combination therapy indicates an upregulation of γH2AX, a DNA damage marker, and the Chk1/ATR pathway, which is involved in replicative stress and DNA damage response. We further demonstrate that the triple combination between lurbinectedin, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) results in a highly efficient killing of tumor cells. Our results are developing insights regarding molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of a novel combination drug treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Asunto(s)

Fluorouracilo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Irinotecán/farmacología , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Carbolinas/farmacología , Carbolinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas

RESUMEN

Integrin receptors have long posed as a potentially attractive target for disrupting cancer hallmarks. Promising preliminary findings with integrin inhibition as an adjuvant to chemotherapy have not translated to clinical success. However, the effect of integrin inhibition on tumor-immune cell interactions remains largely unexplored. Further investigation could shed light on a connection between integrin signaling and immune checkpoint expression, opening the path for using integrin inhibitors to sensitize otherwise resistant tumors to immunotherapy. Fluorescently labeled wild-type HCT-116 colorectal cancer cells and TALL-104 T-cells were co-cultured and treated with GLPG-0187, a small molecule integrin inhibitor, at various doses. This assay revealed dose dependent cancer cell killing, indicating that integrin inhibition may be sensitizing cancer cells to immune cells. The hypothesized mechanism involves TGF-ß-mediated PD-L1 upregulation in cancer cells. To investigate this mechanism, both WT and p53-/- HCT-116 cells were pre-treated with GLPG-0187 and subsequently with latent-TGF-ß. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the addition of latent-TGF-ß increased the expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells. Additionally, a low dose of integrin inhibitor rescued these effects, returning PD-L1 expression back to control levels. This indicates that the immunostimulatory effects of integrin inhibition may be due to downregulation of immune checkpoint PD-L1 on cancer cells. It must be noted that the higher dose of the drug did not reduce PD-L1 expression. This could potentially be due to off-target effects conflicting with the proposed pathway; however, these findings are still under active investigation. Ongoing proteomic experiments will include a larger range of both drug and latent-TGF-ß doses. Probing for additional downstream markers of TGF-ß and up-stream markers of PD-L1 will help to further elucidate this mechanism. Further co-culture experiments will also include anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 therapy to investigate the viability of integrin inhibition as an adjuvant to immune checkpoint blockade.

RESUMEN

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death and the third most common cause of cancer. As the five-year survival with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is 14%, new treatment strategies are needed. Immune checkpoint blockade, which takes advantage of an individual's immune system to fight cancer, has an impact in the clinic; however, for CRC, it is only effective and approved for treating mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer. Moreover, long-term outcomes in MMR-deficient mCRC suggest that most patients are not cured and eventually develop therapy resistance. We hypothesized that targeting TGF-ß signaling may enhance immune-mediated T-cell killing by MMR-deficient CRC cells. Using GLPG-0187, an inhibitor of multiple integrin receptors and TGF-ß, we demonstrate minimal cytotoxicity against MMR-deficient HCT116 or p53null HCT116 human CRC cells. GLPG-0187 promoted significant immune cell killing of the CRC cells by TALL-104 T lymphoblast cells and reduced phosphoSMAD2 in HCT116 p53-null cells either in the absence or presence of exogenous TGF-ß. We observed a reduction in CCL20, CXCL5, prolactin, and TRAIL-R3, while GDF-15 was increased in TALL-104 cells treated with a T-cell activating dose of GLPG-0187 (4 µM). Our results suggest that TGF-ß signaling inhibition by a general integrin receptor inhibitor may boost T-cell killing of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer cells and suggest that a combination of anti-GDF-15 in combination with TGF-ß blockade be further investigated in the treatment of MMR-deficient mCRC. Our results support the development of a novel immune-based therapeutic strategy to treat colorectal cancer by targeting the TGF-ß signaling pathway through integrin receptor blockade.

RESUMEN

p53 is a transcription factor that regulates the expression of genes involved in tumor suppression. p53 mutations mediate tumorigenesis and occur in approximately 50% of human cancers. p53 regulates hundreds of target genes that induce various cell fates including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and DNA damage repair. p53 also plays an important role in anti-tumor immunity by regulating TRAIL, DR5, TLRs, Fas, PKR, ULBP1/2, and CCL2; T-cell inhibitory ligand PD-L1; pro-inflammatory cytokines; immune cell activation state; and antigen presentation. Genetic alteration of p53 can contribute to immune evasion by influencing immune cell recruitment to the tumor, cytokine secretion in the TME, and inflammatory signaling pathways. In some contexts, p53 mutations increase neoantigen load which improves response to immune checkpoint inhibition. Therapeutic restoration of mutated p53 can restore anti-cancer immune cell infiltration and ameliorate pro-tumor signaling to induce tumor regression. Indeed, there is clinical evidence to suggest that restoring p53 can induce an anti-cancer immune response in immunologically cold tumors. Clinical trials investigating the combination of p53-restoring compounds or p53-based vaccines with immunotherapy have demonstrated anti-tumor immune activation and tumor regression with heterogeneity across cancer type. In this Review, we discuss the impact of wild-type and mutant p53 on the anti-tumor immune response, outline clinical progress as far as activating p53 to induce an immune response across a variety of cancer types, and highlight open questions limiting effective clinical translation.