RESUMEN
Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a deadly disease that can be treated with different endovascular devices that will distinctly alter the aortic morphology. Computational methods can be used to understand the effect of anatomical changes on aortic hemodynamics. We propose a standardized method to assess morphological and hemodynamic changes of the abdominal aorta through the longitudinal axis of the vessel. Patient-specific CFD simulations were used to quantify these changes for two different endografts before and after surgery. Differences in cross-sectional area, blood pressure, peak blood velocity, wall shear stress, and retrograde blood flow were accurately evidenced with the proposed methodology.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hemodinámica , Puntos Anatómicos de Referencia , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Prótesis Vascular , Hemorreología , Humanos , Modelos CardiovascularesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES:: To evaluate the effects on aortoiliac fluid dynamics after the implantation of an endograft based on endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) strategy. METHODS:: An adaptive geometrical deformable model was used for aortic lumen segmentation in 8 patients before and after the surgery. Abdominal aneurysms were treated with an endograft based on the EVAS system (Nellix, n = 4) and with a device based on an anatomical fixation technology (n = 4). Pressure, blood velocity, and wall shear stress (WSS) were estimated at different aortic regions using computational fluid dynamics methods. Physiologic inlet/outlet flow values at the abdominal aorta, the celiac trunk, and the mesenteric and the renal arteries were set. Pressure references were set at iliac arteries outlet. RESULTS:: Maximum aneurysm sizes were similar for both groups in the preoperative scans. The lumen area was lower after EVAR ( P < .05) and EVAS ( P < .01) compared to preoperative aortic lumen sizes. Pressure increase was higher in the proximal abdominal aorta after EVAS compared to EVAR (2.3 ± 0.3 mm Hg vs 0.9 ± 0.3 mm Hg, P < .001). Peak blood velocities inside the endografts were 3-fold higher for EVAS compared to EVAR (54 ± 5 cm/s vs 17 ± 4 cm/s, P < .01). Velocities at the iliac arteries also remained higher for EVAS (38 ± 4 cm/s vs 24 ± 4 cm/s, P < .05). Peak WSS at the iliac arteries remained higher for EVAS compared to EVAR group ( P < .05). CONCLUSION:: The significant modification of the aortic bifurcation anatomy after EVAS alters aortoiliac fluid dynamics, showing a pressure impact at the renal arteries level and an acceleration of the blood velocity at the iliac region with a concomitant increase in peak WSS.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hemodinámica , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Presión Arterial , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Humanos , Hidrodinámica , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is responsible for 1-3% of all deaths among the elderly population in developed countries. A novel endograft proposes an endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system that isolates the aneurysm wall from blood flow using a polymer-filled endobag that surrounds two balloon-expandable stents. The volume of injected polymer is determined by monitoring the endobag pressure but the final AAA expansion remains unknown. We conceived and developed a fully deformable surface model for the comparison of pre-operative sac lumen size and final endobag size (measured using a follow-up scan) with the volume of injected polymer. Computed tomography images were acquired for eight patients. Aneurysms were manually and automatically segmented twice by the same observer. The injected polymer volume resulted 9% higher than the aneurysm pre-operative lumen size (p < 0.05), and 11% lower than the final follow-up endobag volume (p < 0.01). The automated method required minimal user interaction; it was fast and used a single set of parameters for all subjects. Intra-observer and manual vs. automated variability of measured volumes were 0.35 ± 2.11 and 0.07 ± 3.04 mL, respectively. Deformable surface models were used to quantify AAA size and showed that EVAS system devices tended to expand the sac lumen size.