RESUMEN
During de novo emergence, new protein coding genes emerge from previously nongenic sequences. The de novo proteins they encode are dissimilar in composition and predicted biochemical properties to conserved proteins. However, functional de novo proteins indeed exist. Both identification of functional de novo proteins and their structural characterization are experimentally laborious. To identify functional and structured de novo proteins in silico, we applied recently developed machine learning based tools and found that most de novo proteins are indeed different from conserved proteins both in their structure and sequence. However, some de novo proteins are predicted to adopt known protein folds, participate in cellular reactions, and to form biomolecular condensates. Apart from broadening our understanding of de novo protein evolution, our study also provides a large set of testable hypotheses for focused experimental studies on structure and function of de novo proteins in Drosophila.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Drosophila , Animales , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/química , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Evolución Molecular , Aprendizaje Automático , Drosophila/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Pliegue de Proteína , Condensados Biomoleculares/metabolismo , Condensados Biomoleculares/químicaRESUMEN
Understanding the emergence and structural characteristics of de novo and random proteins is crucial for unraveling protein evolution and designing novel enzymes. However, experimental determination of their structures remains challenging. Recent advancements in protein structure prediction, particularly with AlphaFold2 (AF2), have expanded our knowledge of protein structures, but their applicability to de novo and random proteins is unclear. In this study, we investigate the structural predictions and confidence scores of AF2 and protein language model-based predictor ESMFold for de novo and conserved proteins from Drosophila and a dataset of comparable random proteins. We find that the structural predictions for de novo and random proteins differ significantly from conserved proteins. Interestingly, a positive correlation between disorder and confidence scores (pLDDT) is observed for de novo and random proteins, in contrast to the negative correlation observed for conserved proteins. Furthermore, the performance of structure predictors for de novo and random proteins is hampered by the lack of sequence identity. We also observe fluctuating median predicted disorder among different sequence length quartiles for random proteins, suggesting an influence of sequence length on disorder predictions. In conclusion, while structure predictors provide initial insights into the structural composition of de novo and random proteins, their accuracy and applicability to such proteins remain limited. Experimental determination of their structures is necessary for a comprehensive understanding. The positive correlation between disorder and pLDDT could imply a potential for conditional folding and transient binding interactions of de novo and random proteins.
Asunto(s)
Pliegue de Proteína , Animales , Secuencia Conservada , Proteínas de Drosophila/química , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Bases de Datos de Proteínas , Modelos Moleculares , Biología Computacional/métodos , Proteínas/química , Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas Intrínsecamente Desordenadas/química , Proteínas Intrínsecamente Desordenadas/metabolismo , Conformación Proteica , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Algoritmos , Drosophila/químicaRESUMEN
Over the past decade, evidence has accumulated that new protein-coding genes can emerge de novo from previously non-coding DNA. Most studies have focused on large scale computational predictions of de novo protein-coding genes across a wide range of organisms. In contrast, experimental data concerning the folding and function of de novo proteins are scarce. This might be due to difficulties in handling de novo proteins in vitro, as most are short and predicted to be disordered. Here, we propose a guideline for the effective expression of eukaryotic de novo proteins in Escherichia coli. We used 11 sequences from Drosophila melanogaster and 10 from Homo sapiens, that are predicted de novo proteins from former studies, for heterologous expression. The candidate de novo proteins have varying secondary structure and disorder content. Using multiple combinations of purification tags, E. coli expression strains, and chaperone systems, we were able to increase the number of solubly expressed putative de novo proteins from 30% to 62%. Our findings indicate that the best combination for expressing putative de novo proteins in E. coli is a GST-tag with T7 Express cells and co-expressed chaperones. We found that, overall, proteins with higher predicted disorder were easier to express. STATEMENT: Today, we know that proteins do not only evolve by duplication and divergence of existing proteins but also arise from previously non-coding DNA. These proteins are called de novo proteins. Their properties are still poorly understood and their experimental analysis faces major obstacles. Here, we aim to present a starting point for soluble expression of de novo proteins with the help of chaperones and thereby enable further characterization.