RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To assess the attitudes of women towards intimate partner violence (IPV) in Guyana. METHODS: We used national data from the publicly available Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) conducted in Guyana in 2019 for women aged 15 to 49 years. The prevalence of women who agreed that a husband is justified in beating his wife was analyzed. Respondent reasons included if she: "goes out without telling him", "neglects the children", "argues with him", "refuses sex with him", "burns the food", "has another partner", "stays out late/partying", "refuses to cook or clean", "overspends", and/or "he doesn't have access to her cellphone". Descriptive analyses were carried for all the variables. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with these 10 respondent reasons, separately and in combination. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of women's attitudes justifying IPV against women if there was a 'yes' response to any of the 10 reasons was 17.9% (95%CI: 16.6-19.3%), and varied from 2.7% if she "goes out without telling him", "burns the food", or "overspends" to 10.0% if she "has another partner". This prevalence ranged from 10.2% in urban areas to 19.3% in rural areas (p<0.001), and from 16.1% in coastal to 30.1% in interior areas (p<0.001). Similarly, 25.9% of women from the poorest household agreed that a husband has the right in beating his wife for any of the 10 reasons compared to 11.6% of the richest women (11.6%) (p<0.001). Rural place of residence, ethnicity, geographic region, level of education, wealth quintile, ever used of a computer, and frequency of listening to the radio were significant factors associated with women's attitudes justifying IPV against women (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Over one-sixth of the respondents agreed that a husband was justified in committing IPV against women in Guyana. Public health programs focusing on geographic locations, ethnicity, and economic status must be implemented to change attitudes justifying IPV and reduce this significant public health challenge.
Asunto(s)
Violencia de Pareja , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Violencia de Pareja/psicología , Violencia de Pareja/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Guyana/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia , Actitud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población RuralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy, safety, health outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate (FP) versus montelukast (MON) in 342 children (6 to 12 years of age) with persistent asthma. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, 12-week study of treatment with FP inhalation powder 50 mug twice daily or MON chewable 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with MON, FP significantly increased mean percent change from baseline FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) (P=.002), morning PEF (peak expiratory flow) (P=.004), evening PEF (P=.020), and percent rescue-free days (P=.002) at end point, and it significantly reduced nighttime symptom scores (P <.001) and mean total (P=.018), and nighttime (P <.001) albuterol use. Withdrawals from the study were more frequent with MON (21%) than with FP (13%). Adverse events (69% vs 71%) and mean end point to baseline 12-hour urinary cortisol excretion ratios were similar. Parents and physicians were more satisfied with FP treatment than with MON (P=.006 and P=.016, respectively, at Week 12). Mean total daily asthma-related cost per patient in the FP group was approximately one-third of that in the MON group ($1.25 vs $3.49). CONCLUSION: FP was significantly more effective than MON in improving pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and rescue albuterol use. Both therapies had similar safety profiles. Parent- and physician-reported satisfaction ratings were higher with FP treatment, and asthma-related costs were lower.