RESUMEN
Two groups of college students in Malaysia, ethnic Malay and ethnic Chinese, completed a mental illness attribution and help seeking questionnaire, and these responses were also compared with the responses of their mothers. As expected, ethnic Malays rated religious items, such as God and prayer, higher than the Chinese. However, both groups rated the social and psychological causes higher than religious, supernatural or physical causes. Contrary to our predictions, there were no intergenerational differences among either ethnic group. Medical pluralism was demonstrated, as a variety of apparently contradictory help seeking behaviors received quite high ratings including doctor/pharmacy, prayer, herbal medicine and traditional healers.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Comparación Transcultural , Etnicidad/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Adulto , China/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Malasia , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudiantes/psicologíaRESUMEN
The present study used factor analytic procedures to examine the factor structure of the CES-D among Filipino-American adolescents residing in rural and small town Hawaii. A total of 243 Filipino-American high school students completed the 20-item scale, and maximum likelihood analyses were employed to obtain a final solution. The results indicated that two factors provide a reasonably good fit: factor I combined depressed affect, somatic-retardation and interpersonal items, and factor II consisted of the remaining four positive affect items. The overlap of depressed affect and somatic symptoms support previous findings found among Asian American adults and other ethnic minority adolescents. The loading of the interpersonal items on the first factor is more unusual and suggests that interpersonal factors are not distinguished from depressed affect for the Filipino-American adolescent group. The usefulness of the CES-D as a tool to gain an understanding of the concept of depression across cultures is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Población Blanca , Adolescente , Comparación Transcultural , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Hawaii/epidemiología , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Cómputos Matemáticos , Grupos Minoritarios , Filipinas/etnología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Native Hawaiian Mental Health Research Development Program is an epidemiological longitudinal study of adolescents residing in Hawaii. This article examines the utility of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) for predicting DSM-III-R diagnoses of major depression (MD) and dysthymic disorder (DD) and investigates whether prediction differs by gender and ethnicity. METHOD: Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children interviews were conducted with 556 adolescents randomly selected from among more than 7,000 students who had completed the CES-D. RESULTS: Six-month prevalence rates were as follows: MD = 8.5%, DD = 4.7%, either (MDDD) = 9.9%. Prevalence rates were significantly higher among females, but after CES-D scores were accounted for, gender no longer predicted depression in most analyses. When a cutoff score of 16 was used, classification accuracy was lower for Native Hawaiians than non-Hawaiians. However, after group differences in gender and grade level were accounted for, the predictive validity of the CES-D did not differ by ethnicity. CES-D factor 1 scores identified MD, DD, and MDDD about as well as the total score or all three factors together. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the validity of the CES-D for screening for depression among adolescents of Native Hawaiian and other minority backgrounds.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Distímico/diagnóstico , Etnicidad/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Distímico/psicología , Femenino , Hawaii , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
Minority ethnic status has been found to be related to higher levels of depressive symptoms among adolescents and adults. The present study examined the rates of depressive symptoms (as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: CES-D Scale) of 270 Filipino American adolescents residing in rural and small-town areas of Hawaii. CES-D scores were compared with scores of a White group, and no ethnic differences were found. Compared with Filipino males, Filipino females were found to have higher CES-D scores, with higher mean scores on the majority of the CES-D items. The few Filipino students who reported attempting suicide had moderately high to very high levels of reported depressive symptoms. Lack of ethnic differences may be due to Hawaii's unique cultural mix, where there is no single "majority group" and a high rate of cultural interaction.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/etnología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comparación Transcultural , Femenino , Hawaii/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Filipinas/etnología , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
A large number of adolescents of interracial ancestry (parents comprising various combinations of African-American, American Indian/Alaska Native, European-American, Chinese, Filipino, Hispanic, Japanese, Korean, Puerto Rican, Samoan, and Tongan ancestry) were contrasted with a monoracial European-American sample in the degree to which they reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, conduct disorder/aggression, and substance abuse. The adolescents of interracial ancestry were subdivided into three groups in terms of parental ancestry: both parents of interracial ancestry, one parent of interracial and the other of monoracial ancestry, and both parents of monoracial but different ancestries. The interracial ancestry groups did not differ significantly from one another or from the European American sample in terms of symptom scores.