RESUMEN

Acute aortic valve insufficiency (AAVI) is a pathologic medical condition that has a presentation on a spectrum of severity and is attributable to numerous etiologies. Most often, it is caused by infective endocarditis, which depending on the patient's clinical status may require treatment with either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This case presents a patient with acute aortic valve insufficiency secondary to infective endocarditis, requiring intervention. Further, it also provides real-time use of the general guidelines used in the determination of SAVR vs. TAVR candidacy. This case will further help providers in the cardiology realm to identify this presentation and increase comfort in referring to existing guidelines, as well as highlight where the current guidelines appear limited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has shown significant promise, particularly in neuroimaging. AI increases efficiency and reduces errors, making it a valuable resource for physicians. With the increasing amount of data processing and image interpretation required, the ability to use AI to augment and aid the radiologist could improve the quality of patient care. Observations: AI can predict patient wait times, which may allow more efficient patient scheduling. Additionally, AI can save time for repeat magnetic resonance neuroimaging and reduce the time spent during imaging. AI has the ability to read computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography with reduced or without contrast without significant loss in sensitivity for detecting lesions. Neuroimaging does raise important ethical considerations and is subject to bias. It is vital that users understand the practical and ethical considerations of the technology. Conclusions: The demonstrated applications of AI in neuroimaging are numerous and varied, and it is reasonable to assume that its implementation will increase as the technology matures. AI's use for detecting neurologic conditions holds promise in combatting ever increasing imaging volumes and providing timely diagnoses.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Craniotomies for resection of neoplastic lesions are at increased risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) as compared to non-neoplastic pathologies. SSIs can be detrimental due to delay in pivotal adjuvant therapies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of SSI in primary brain tumors, to analyze risk factors, and to evaluate effectiveness of topical vancomycin in reducing SSIs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a National Cancer Institutedesignated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 799) who were subjected to craniotomy from 2004 to 2014 were included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, use of topical vancomycin and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Topical vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of SSI (0.8%) compared to standard care (5%), ( p = 0.00071; OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.02 - 0.5). Narcotic use ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.24; 95% CI = 0.96 - 4.81), previous brain radiation ( p = 0.043; OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.02 - 4.29), length of hospitalization ( p = 0.01; OR= 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.08), and 30 day re-operation ( p = 1.58 ×10 -10; OR = 15.23; 95% CI = 7.06 - 32.71) were associated with increased risk for SSI. CONCLUSION: Topical vancomycin effectively reduced the rate of SSI in patients subjected to craniotomy for primary brain tumor resection. Furthermore, preoperative narcotic use, previous head/brain radiation, length of hospitalization, and 30-day reoperation were associated with increased risk of SSI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has precipitated the worst global pandemic in a century, which has caused millions of infections and deaths as well as massive economic repercussions. Objective: As with any pathogenic virus, it is crucial to understand its unique interactions with the human immune system so that pharmaceutical and prophylactic interventions can be deployed to effectively control the pandemic. Methods: A literature search by using PubMed was conducted in 2020 with variants of the terms "COVID-19," "SARS-CoV-2," and "immunological response." English language articles that presented original data about the immunologic response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were selected for review. This article reviewed the current understanding of the innate and adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection, including their relationship to current therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. Results: SARS-CoV-2 uses several unique molecular techniques to evade detection by the innate immune system early in the course of infection, and upregulation of these innate immune pathways may possibly accelerate the time to recovery and prevent severe disease. Although the majority of cases results in the patients' recovery, a significant proportion of infections result in deaths prompted by the host's inflammatory overreaction to the infection, a response that can be attenuated with corticosteroids and potentially other immune modulators. Conclusion: Current work by the scientific community to further understand how SARS-CoV-2 interacts with the human immune system will be invaluable to our response and preparedness for future coronavirus pandemics.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a curative treatment option for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Both total body irradiation (TBI)-based and chemotherapy only-based myeloablative transplantation conditioning regimens have been applied, but the optimal regimen remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy of TBI-based versus chemotherapy only-based myeloablative conditioning regimens. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and meeting abstracts for all studies comparing TBI-based and chemotherapy only-based conditioning regimens in patients who underwent allo-HCT for ALL. Two authors independently reviewed all studies for inclusion and extracted data related to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The overall methodological quality of the included studies was optimal. TBI-based regimens showed evidence of benefit compared with chemotherapy only-based conditioning regimens in terms of relapse (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.94; 6 studies, 5091 patients), OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.89; 7 studies, 4727 patients), and PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85; 7 studies, 4727 patients). The TBI-based regimen did not increase the likelihood of grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.36; 5 studies, 4996 patients) or chronic GVHD (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.21; 5 studies, 4490 patients), or NRM (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28; 6 studies, 4522 patients). However, TBI-based regimens were associated with an increased risk of grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.63; 3 studies, 3675 patients). A subgroup comparison of patients age ≥16 years showed similar results. This systematic review represents evidence supporting the use of TBI-based conditioning regimen in patients undergoing allo-HCT for ALL who are candidates for myeloablative conditioning, as it offers better OS, PFS, and less relapse with acceptable NRM.

Asunto(s)