Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HLA ; 104(3): e15649, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39247998

RESUMEN

HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) are implicated in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), graft dysfunction and failure in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Non-HLA antibodies including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) may also play a role in AMR, impact graft function and survival. Data is limited in paediatric KT cohorts. We aimed to assess the prevalence and effect of pre-transplant AT1R antibodies on rejection, graft function and survival in paediatric KT recipients. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted across two paediatric centres including KT recipients with a pre-transplant AT1R antibody level. Outcomes included rejection, de novo DSA formation, graft function, failure, proteinuria and hypertension. Of 71 individuals, 72% recorded a positive pre-transplant AT1R Ab level (≥17 U/mL). Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, AT1R Ab positivity demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of rejection however was not statistically significant (HR 3.45, 95% CI 0.97-12.35, p-value 0.06). Sensitivity analysis with AT1R Ab levels of ≥25 U/mL (HR 2.05 95% CI 0.78-5.39, p-value 0.14) and ≥40 U/mL (HR 1.32, CI 95% 0.55-3.17, p-value 0.53) validated this. De novo DSA formation occurred more frequently with AT1R Ab positivity (41% vs. 20%, p-value 0.9). AT1R Ab was not associated with hypertension, proteinuria, graft failure or dysfunction. In conclusion, this cohort study demonstrated a high prevalence of pre-transplant AT1R Ab positivity (72%). AT1R Ab positivity demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of rejection and de novo DSA formation however did not meet statistical significance. There was no association between AT1R Ab and hypertension, proteinuria, graft failure or dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón , Receptor de Angiotensina Tipo 1 , Humanos , Receptor de Angiotensina Tipo 1/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Preescolar , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Proteinuria/inmunología , Proteinuria/sangre , Hipertensión/inmunología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/sangre
2.
Kidney Int ; 59(5): 1919-27, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11318964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) relapse frequently and receive immunosuppressive agents. In this systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the benefits and harms of these immunosuppressive agents are evaluated. METHODS: RCTs with outcome data at six months or more that evaluated noncorticosteroid agents in relapsing SSNS were included. A summary relative risk for relapse at 6 to 12 months was calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen trials involving 631 children were identified. Cyclophosphamide [3 trials; relative risk (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26 to 0.73] and chlorambucil (2 trials; RR 0.13, 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.57) significantly reduced the relapse risk at 6 to 12 months compared with prednisone alone. In the single chlorambucil versus cyclophosphamide trial, there was no observed difference in relapse risk at two years (RR 1.31, 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.13). Cyclosporine was as effective as cyclophosphamide (1 trial; RR 1.07, 95% CI, 0.48 to 2.35) and chlorambucil (1 trial; RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.53), but the effect was not sustained when cyclosporine was ceased. During treatment, levamisole (3 trials; RR 0.60, 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79) was more effective than steroids alone, but the effect was not sustained. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide, chorambucil, cyclosporine, and levamisole reduce the risk of relapse in children with relapsing SSNS compared with prednisone alone. Clinically important differences in efficacy among these agents are possible, and further comparative trials are still needed. Meanwhile, the choice between these agents depends on physician and patient preferences related to therapy duration and complication type and frequency.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Clorambucilo/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA