RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Various techniques, products, and protocols are used for the bleaching of non-vital teeth. The walking bleach technique involves sealing the bleaching agent in the pulp chamber. In the inside/outside technique, a low-concentration bleaching agent is applied at home using a custom tray. In the in-office technique, a high-concentration bleaching agent is applied by a dental professional. Limited research has compared the effectiveness of these techniques. OBJECTIVE: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the walking bleach, the inside/outside, and the in-office bleaching techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-four discolored teeth were selected according to eligibility criteria, randomized, and assigned to three treatment groups (n=18): walking bleach (sodium perborate - SP), inside/outside bleaching (7.5% hydrogen peroxide -HP7.5), and in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide - HP35). A cervical seal was placed in all the teeth, and nonvital bleaching was performed according to each technique. The CIELab color coordinates were measured using a clinical spectrophotometer at baseline, weekly, and at the 1-week follow-up. ΔE00 and ΔWID were calculated between the baseline and each evaluation time point. The ANOVA, Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare the quantitative variables, and the Fisher exact test, to determine the association among categorical variables. Bleaching effectiveness was interpreted by 50:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. RESULTS: As the treatment progressed, all techniques presented a significant increase in L* and WID (p<0.001), and a significant decrease in a* and b* (p<0.001). HP7.5 and HP35 presented greater increases in WID mean values, in comparison with SP (p=0.006). No significant differences were observed among the techniques for ΔE00 after treatment completion (p=0.383). There were no statistical differences in bleaching effectiveness among the techniques after treatment completion (p=0.098). CONCLUSION: All techniques presented excellent effectiveness after treatment completion. However, HP7.5 and HP35 techniques provided a more rapid whitening response.

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the layering technique to mask a discolored background (C4) after one year of water aging. The technique was used with three resin composite restorative systems (IPS Empress Direct, Charisma Diamond, and Filtek Z350XT). Ninety 1.5-mm-thick specimens were divided into groups and subgroups according to the restorative system and resin composite shade combination used in the layering technique (enamel, body, and dentin). The color measurements were made by reflection spectrophotometer (SP60, EX-Rite) over the C4 substrate at two time points: after 24-hour water immersion (T0) and after one-year water aging (T1). The masking ability was evaluated by calculating the ΔE between an inherent color background and a C4 background at T0 and T1. CIELAB and CIEDE2000 formulas were used for comparative analysis between T0 and T1 color measurements. Analysis of variance and Turkey's post hoc test (a=0.05) were performed to analyze ΔEab and ΔE00 mean values. The Z350XT restorative system presented adequate masking ability in the combinations of 0.5 mm body + 1.0 mm dentin, 0.5 mm enamel + 1.0 mm dentin, and 1.5 mm dentin after 24-hour water immersion. The masking ability was affected negatively by water aging in most of the combinations. The IPS Empress Direct was the only system that remained stable after aging in the combinations of 0.5 mm enamel + 1.0 mm dentin and + 1.5 mm dentin (p=0.05 and p=0.47 for CIELAB; p=0.15 and p=0.51 for CIEDE2000), although it did not present adequate masking ability in both time points. None of the combinations of any system presented adequate masking ability after prolonged water aging.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of three resin composite systems to mask a severely discolored background by the application of a layering technique through CIELAB and CIEDE2000 analysis. Ninety 1.5-mm-thick disc specimens were produced from three different resin composite restoration systems: IPS Empress Direct (Ivoclar Vivadent), Charisma Diamond (Heraeus Kulzer), and Filtek Z350 XT (3M-ESPE). The specimens were divided into groups according to the restoration system and the resin composite shade combination used for the layering technique (enamel, body, and dentin shades). Color measurements were performed by a reflectance spectrophotometer (SP60, EX-Rite) against a C4 shade background and an inherent color background, which simulates a severely discolored background and a tooth surface with no discoloration, respectively. The total color difference between both color measurements was calculated by CIELAB (ΔE*ab) and CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) formulas. The mean ΔEab* and ΔE00 values were analyzed by analysis of variance (general linear models) and Tukey's post hoc tests (α=0.05). Three groups presented clinically acceptable color difference values (ΔE*≦3.46 and ΔE00≦2.25): 1.5 mm dentin, 1.0 mm dentin/0.5 mm body, and 1.0 mm dentin/0.5 mm enamel; ie, all the groups from the Z350 XT restoration system. The resin composite layering technique is an effective way to mask severely discolored backgrounds. The Filtek Z350 XT system was the only restoration system capable of masking the C4 background.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In vitro staining methods expose the entire specimen to staining solutions. In a real clinical situation, this is not observed, since one should consider that the bonded surface is not exposed to the oral environment. Theoretically, the clinical condition would be the best simulated if the specimens were exposed to staining solutions by partial immersion. AIMS: To evaluate if different immersion methods and surface treatments influence the color stability of resin-based specimens. METHODOLOGY: A stainless steel matrix was used to prepare 30 disc-shaped specimens that were randomly allocated in three groups: Without polishing, polishing with abrasive discs, and surface sealant. Half of the specimens were isolated to maintain only the upper surface exposed to staining (partial immersion) and the other half was totally immersed in coffee solution for 48 h (total immersion). The coordinates ΔE*, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* were assessed by spectrophotometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests (α =0.05). RESULTS: Specimens submitted to partial immersion showed lower values of ΔE*, ΔL*, Δa*, Δb*, in comparison to total immersion (P = 0.000). Specimens covered by a surface sealant presented lower ΔE* values regardless of the immersion method. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens totally immersed in staining solutions could in somehow overestimate the color change, once that in most clinical conditions not all of the restoration surfaces are exposed to the oral environment. Moreover, as the surface sealant application produces color change values that are clinically acceptable, it might be used in esthetic restorations as an adjunct treatment.

Asunto(s)