RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery is the approach of choice for multiple procedures, being laparoscopic cholecystectomy one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Likewise, video recording of these surgeries has become widespread. Currently, the market offers medical recording devices (MRD) with an approximate cost of 2000 USD, and alternative non-medical recording devices (NMRD) with a cost ranging from 120 to 200 USD. To our knowledge, no comparative studies between the available recording devices have been done. We aim to compare the perception of the quality of videos recorded by MRD and NMRD in a group of surgeons and surgical residents. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey to compare recordings from three NMRDs (Elgato 30 fps, AverMedia 60 fps, Hauppauge 30 fps) and one MRD (MediCap 20 fps) during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The survey assessed: definition of anatomical structures (DA), fluidity of movements (FM), similarity with the operating room screen (ORsim), and overall quality (OQ). Descriptive and nonparametric analytical statistics tests were applied. Results were analyzed using JMP-15 software. RESULTS: Forty surveys were collected (80% surgeons, 20% residents). NMRDs scored significantly higher than MRD in DA (p = 0.003), FM (p < 0.001), ORsim (p < 0.001), and OQ (p < 0.001). One NMRD was chosen as the highest quality device (70%), and MRD as the poorest (78%). No significant differences were found when analyzing by surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of recording laparoscopic procedures, non-medical video recording devices (NMRDs) outperformed medical-grade recording device (MRD) with a higher overall score. This suggests that NMRDs could serve as a cost-effective alternative with superior video quality for recording laparoscopic surgeries.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Nearly 200,000 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are performed yearly. Reported learning curves range between 50 and 150, even 500 cases to decrease the operative risk. Simulation programs could accelerate this learning curve safely; however, trainings for LRYGB are scarce. This study aims to describe and share our 5-year experience of a simulated program designed to achieve proficiency in LRYGB technical skills. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was used. All recruited participants were previously trained with basic and advanced laparoscopic simulation curriculum completing over 50 h of practical training. Ex vivo animal models were used to practice manual and stapled gastrojejunostomy (GJ) and stapled jejunojejunostomy (JJO) in 10, 3, and 4 sessions, respectively. The main outcome was to assess the manual GJ skill acquisition. Pre- and post-training assessments using a Global Rating Scale (GRS; max 25 pts), Specific Rating Scale (SRS; max 20 pts), performance time, permeability, and leakage rates were analyzed. For the stapled GJ and JJO, execution time was registered. Data analysis was performed using parametric tests. RESULTS: In 5 years, 68 trainees completed the program. For the manual GJ's pre- vs post-training assessment, GRS and SRS scores increased significantly (from 17 to 24 and from 13 to 19 points respectively, p-value < 0.001). Permeability rate increased while leakage rate and procedural time decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: This simulated training program showed effectiveness in improving laparoscopic skills for manual GJ and JJO in a simulated scenario. This new training program could optimize the clinical learning curve. Further studies are needed to assess the transfer of skills to the operating room.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Introduction. The use of simulation in surgery has made it possible to shorten learning curves through deliberate practice. Although it has been incorporated long ago, there are still no clear recommendations to standardize its development and implementation. This manuscript aims to share recommendations based on our experience of more than twelve years of employing and improving a methodology in laparoscopic surgical simulation. Topics for Reflection. To transfer surgical skills to a trainee, we base our methodology on a three-pillar framework: The hardware and infrastructure (tools to train with), the training program itself (what to do), and the feedback (how to improve). Implementing a cost-effective program is feasible: the hardware does not need to be high fidelity to transfer skills, but the program needs to be validated. These pillars have evolved over time by incorporating technology: the on-site guidance from experts has changed to a remote and asynchronous modality by video recording the trainee's execution, and by enabling remote and asynchronous feedback. The feedback provider does not necessarily have to be an expert clinician in the subject, but a person previously trained to be a trainer. This allows for deliberate practice until mastery has been reached and learning curves are consolidated. Conclusions. Recommendations based on the experience of our center have been presented, explaining the framework of our strategy. Considering these suggestions, it is hoped that our simulation methodology can aid the development and implementation of effective simulationbased programs for other groups and institutions.

Introducción. El uso de la simulación en cirugía ha permitido acortar las curvas de aprendizaje mediante la práctica deliberada. A pesar de que se ha incorporado previamente, aún no existen recomendaciones claras para estandarizar su desarrollo e implementación. Este manuscrito pretende compartir recomendaciones basadas en nuestra experiencia, con más de doce años empleando y mejorando una metodología en la simulación quirúrgica laparoscópica. Temas de reflexión. Para transferir las habilidades quirúrgicas a un aprendiz, basamos nuestra metodología en un marco de tres pilares: El hardware y la infraestructura (herramientas con las que entrenar), el programa de entrenamiento (qué hacer), y la retroalimentación (cómo mejorar). La implementación de un programa rentable es factible: el hardware no necesita ser de alta fidelidad para transferir las habilidades, pero el programa necesita ser validado. Estos pilares han evolucionado a lo largo del tiempo incorporando tecnología: la presencia de expertos ha evolucionado a una modalidad remota y asincrónica mediante la grabación en vídeo de la ejecución del alumno, y permitiendo su retroalimentación. Aquel que entrega retroalimentación no tiene que ser necesariamente un clínico experto en la materia, sino una persona previamente formada como instructor. Esto permite una práctica deliberada hasta dominar la habilidad y establecer curvas de aprendizaje. Conclusiones. Se han presentado recomendaciones basadas en la experiencia de nuestro centro, explicando el marco de nuestra estrategia. Teniendo en cuenta estas sugerencias, se espera que nuestra metodología de simulación pueda ayudar al desarrollo e implementación de programas efectivos basados en la simulación a otros grupos e instituciones.

Introdução. O uso de simulação em cirurgia tornou possível encurtar as curvas de aprendizagem por meio da prática deliberada. Embora tenha sido incorporado anteriormente, ainda não há recomendações claras para padronizar seu desenvolvimento e implementação. Este manuscrito pretende compartilhar recomendações com base em nossa experiência, com mais de doze anos usando e aprimorando uma metodologia em simulação cirúrgica laparoscópica. Temas de reflexão. Para transferir habilidades cirúrgicas para um aprendiz, baseamos nossa metodologia em uma estrutura de três pilares: o hardware e a infraestrutura (ferramentas para treinar), o programa de treinamento (o que fazer) e feedback (como melhorar). A implementação de um programa rentável é viável: o hardware não precisa ser de alta fidelidade para transferir as habilidades, mas o programa precisa ser validado. Esses pilares evoluíram ao longo do tempo incorporando a tecnologia: a presença de especialistas evoluiu para uma modalidade remota e assíncrona por meio da gravação em vídeo do desempenho do aluno e permitindo seu feedback. Quem dá feedback não precisa ser necessariamente um clínico especialista na área, mas sim uma pessoa previamente treinada como instrutor. Isso permite a prática deliberada até que a habilidade seja dominada e estabeleça curvas de aprendizado. Conclusões. Foram apresentadas recomendações baseadas na experiência do nosso centro, explicando o enquadramento da nossa estratégia. Levando em consideração essas sugestões, espera-se que nossa metodologia de simulação possa ajudar outros grupos e instituições a desenvolver e implementar programas eficazes baseados em simulação.

Asunto(s)