Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt C): 102126, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802166

RESUMEN

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is a significant cause of cardiogenic shock (CS). We present a case of a 56-year-old previously healthy man who arrived with vague abdominal symptoms, over 2 weeks. Subsequently, the patient's condition rapidly deteriorated over 12 hours, leading to cardiogenic shock categorized as Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stage D. Echocardiography and right heart catheterization confirmed multiorgan failure secondary to severe cardiac dysfunction. Mechanical circulatory support was initiated using an Impella CP device 20 hours after admission due to ongoing deterioration. Considering refractory cardiogenic shock and within 24 hours, the patient received combined veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella CP support (ECPElla). With gradual improvement in the patient's clinical status and organ function, successful weaning from VA ECMO to Impella 5.5 was achieved. Ultimately, the patient underwent a successful orthotopic heart and kidney transplantation, marking a significant milestone in his recovery. The case underscores the importance of promptly identifying and responding to cardiogenic shock through invasive hemodynamic assessment. Collaborative decision-making involving a multidisciplinary team played a crucial role in the initiation, escalation, and eventual weaning of mechanical circulatory support, culminating in the successful bridging to a dual organ transplantation for this patient with CS secondary to NICM.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Cardiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos
2.
Angiology ; 74(1): 31-38, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440216

RESUMEN

Despite advances in temporary mechanical circulatory support (TMCS), in-hospital mortality and morbidity related to cardiogenic shock due to ST elevation myocardial infarction (CS-STEMI) are highly prevalent. We identified admissions with CS-STEMI between 2016 and 2019 from the National Readmission Database (NRD). Among 80 997 patients with CS-STEMI, we identified 42,139 without TMCS, while the remaining received various types of TMCS (Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] alone: n = 753; Intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP] alone: n = 27 556; Impella alone: n = 9055; ECMO with IABP or Impella: n = 1494). 30-day readmission rates did not differ among groups, whereas 90-day readmissions were higher among those with combined ECMO and IABP or Impella support (P = .027). In-hospital mortality and complications including hemodialysis, transfusion, and stroke were the highest in the Impella and combined ECMO and IABP/Impella groups. Heart failure was the most common cause of readmission. Multivariable logistic regression revealed female gender, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, heart failure, chronic kidney, and peripheral artery disease as risk factors for 90-day readmissions. Our study unveiled several important factors associated with readmission and mortality related to TMCS in CS-STEMI. Approaches to identify and prevent readmissions by addressing these factors may lead to lower morbidity, healthcare cost related to readmission, and improved quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Femenino , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/efectos adversos
3.
J Clin Med ; 11(20)2022 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36294432

RESUMEN

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) continues to affect patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and results in increased morbidity and mortality. Information regarding the impact of right ventricular response to pre-operative optimization on outcomes is scarce. Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent first continuous flow LVAD implantation between 2006 and 2020. Patients with bi-ventricular support before LVAD or without hemodynamic data were excluded. Invasive hemodynamics at baseline and after pre-operative medical and/or temporary circulatory support were recorded. Patients were grouped in the following categories: A: No Hemodynamic RV dysfunction (RVD) at baseline; B: RVD with achievement of RV hemodynamic optimization goals; C: RVD without achievement of RV optimization goals. The main outcomes were right ventricular failure defined as inotropes >14 days after implantation, or postoperative right ventricular mechanical support, and all-cause mortality. Results: Overall, 128 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 58 ±12.5 years, 74.2% were males and, 68.7% had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic RVD was present in 70 (54.7%) of the patients at baseline. RV hemodynamic goals were achieved in 46 (79.31%) patients with RVD and in all the patients without RVD at baseline. Failure to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with a significantly higher risk of RVF after LVAD implantation (adjusted OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.14−16.76, p = 0.031) compared with no RVD at baseline and increased 1-year mortality compared with no RVD (adjusted HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.24−13.2, p = 0.02) and optimized RVD (adjusted HR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6−25.2, p = 0.008).Conclusion: Among patients with RVD, the inability to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with higher rates of RV failure and increased 1-year all-cause mortality post LVAD implantation.

4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(17): e025507, 2022 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36000418

RESUMEN

Background The clinical characteristics of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors use in heart transplant recipients and their outcomes have not been well described. Methods and Results We compared patients who received mTOR inhibitors within the first 2 years after heart transplantation to patients who did not by inquiring the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between 2010 and 2018. The primary end point was all-cause mortality with retransplantation as a competing event. Rejection, malignancy, hospitalization for infection, and renal transplantation were secondary end points. There were 1619 (9%) and 15 686 (81%) mTOR inhibitors+ and mTOR inhibitors- patients, respectively. Body mass index, induction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, calculated panel reactive antibody, and fewer days in 1A status were independently associated with mTOR inhibitors+ status. Over a follow-up of 10.4 years, there was no difference in all-cause mortality after adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.03 [0.90-1.19]; P=0.66). mTOR inhibitors+ were independently associated with increased risk for rejection (odds ratio [OR], 1.43 [1.11-1.83]; P=0.005) and basal skin cancer (OR, 1.35 [1.19-1.51]; P=0.012) but not for infection or renal transplantation. Conclusions mTOR inhibitors are used in <10% patients in the first 2 years after heart transplantation and are noninferior to contemporary immunosuppression regimens in terms of all-cause mortality, infection, malignancy, or renal transplantation. They are associated with risk for rejection.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Trasplante de Riñón , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inhibidores mTOR , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR
5.
Heart Fail Rev ; 26(1): 47-55, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696152

RESUMEN

Accurate mean blood pressure determination is essential to prevent adverse events in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CFLVAD). We sought to evaluate the accuracy of noninvasive methods of blood pressure measurement compared with invasive intra-arterial recordings in patients with CFLVAD. Systematic electronic search was performed on four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Knowledge) for the terms "Blood Pressure" AND ("Heart-Assist Devices" OR "Left ventricular Assist Devices"). Only studies that compared an intra-arterial and noninvasive blood pressure measurement were included. Electronic search of scientific literature identified 5968 articles. After deduplication, screening of titles and abstracts, full-text review, and excluding incorrect populations and comparator, a total of 12 studies with 502 participants were included, of those 402 participants who had intra-arterial blood pressure measurement. Doppler mean arterial blood pressure showed a very high correlation with mean intra-arterial blood pressure (r = 0.97, r = 0.87) in low pulsatility situations. When the pulsatility was not evaluated, the correlation was high moderate (r = 0.63, r = 0.741). In low pulsatility situations, the correlation was moderate to high moderate (r = 0.42 to r = 0.65). Oscillometer automatic blood pressure cuff showed a moderate to very high correlation with intra-arterial mean arterial blood pressure (r = 0.42, r = 0.86) but also could be low in the context of low pulsatility associated with inconsistent success in noninvasive measurement (r = 0.25). Studies correlating intra-arterial with noninvasive techniques were performed in the context of routine clinical care using fluid-filled catheters. The degree of correlation between both methods is at least moderate.


Asunto(s)
Presión Arterial , Corazón Auxiliar , Presión Sanguínea , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ultrasonografía Doppler
6.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 16(5): 421-428, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31217796

RESUMEN

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by symptoms and sings of heart failure with elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or during exercise. It is the most common type of heart failure in the elderly and its prevalence increases with age and is higher in females at any given age. HFpEF is frequently accompanied of comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. The diagnosis relies in the integration of clinical information, laboratory data and interpretation of cardiac imaging and hemodynamic findings at rest and during exercise. Conditions that have a specific treatment such as coronary artery disease, valvular disease, cardiac amyloidosis and constrictive pericarditis should be considered and evaluated as appropriate. Aggressive management of comorbidities, optimization of blood pressure control and volume status using diuretics as needed are among the current treatment recommendations. There are no specific therapies that have shown to decrease mortality in HFpEF. In symptomatic patients with history of hospital admission for decompensated heart failure, the implantation of a wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitor should be considered. Finally, given the high mortality of this condition, goals of care discussion should be initiated early and involvement of palliative care medicine should be considered.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA