RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Cervical Flexion-Rotation Test (CFRT) is widely used in the assessment of upper cervical spine mobility impairments and in the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache (CGH) by physiotherapist. Many studies investigated its different properties, and the results show that the CFRT has good construct validity in the measurement of C1-C2 rotation as well as good to excellent reliability. PURPOSE: In this theoretical paper, we explore the value and point out two methodological issues associated to the CFRT, one related to the procedures and another related to its diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Our analysis indicate that there are many confounding factors that could affect the CFRT cut-off's accuracy, which are likely to overestimate the diagnosis properties of CFRT. Potential solutions are discussed. Moreover, the gold standard (manual examination) used to examine the validity of the CFRT for the diagnosis of CGH appears to be far from perfect - we could argue that the diagnostic properties of the CFRT for CGH might be biased and the likelihood ratios are likely to be overestimated. However, it could be relevant to explore if results of the CFRT could be considered as a treatment-effect modifier. Maybe the CFRT could be more valuable as a prognostic factor? CONCLUSION: The quality of evidence supporting the validity of the CFRT is most likely biased. In the absence of a better gold standard, maybe the CFRT could be a more valuable test to establish the patient's prognosis and help the clinician to choose the most appropriate treatment options.

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) may originate from the C1-C2 zygapophyseal joints. CGH is often associated with loss of range of motion (ROM), specific to this segment, and measurable by the cervical flexion-rotation test (CFRT). The main purposes of the study were: 1) to investigate the immediate effect of C1-C2 rotation SNAG mobilizations plus C1-C2 self-SNAG rotation exercise for patients with CGH and 2) to explore the link between the CFRT results and treatment response. METHODS: A prospective quasi-experimental single-arm design was used where patients with CGH received eight physical therapy treatments using a C1-C2 rotational SNAG technique combined with a C1-C2 self-SNAG rotation exercise over a four-week period. Outcome measures were pain intensity/frequency and duration, active cervical ROM, CFRT, neck-related and headache-related self-perceived physical function, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. RESULTS: The intervention produced strong effects on pain intensity, CFRT, physical function and pain catastrophizing. Moderate improvement was noted on active cervical ROM and on fear-avoidance beliefs and kinesiophobia. No link was found between pre-intervention CFRT ROM and treatment response. CONCLUSION: SNAG mobilization combined with a self-SNAG exercise resulted in favorable outcomes for the treatment of CGH on patient-important and biomechanical outcomes, as well as pain-related cognitive-affective factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEPs) act positively on clinical outcome measures in patients with low back pain (LBP), but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Among the various neuromuscular mechanisms, a good candidate is better activation of the abdominal wall, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether RUSI measures are (1) sensitive to LBP status and treatment (LSEP) and (2) correlate with clinical outcomes following the LSEP. DESIGN: An exploratory one-arm clinical trial with healthy participants as a control group. SETTING: LSEP was delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes were measured in a laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one patients with nonacute LBP and 30 healthy controls. METHODS: Outcome measures were performed before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and with the same time interval for control participants to compare with patients at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pain, disability, as well as static (at rest) and dynamic (percent thickness change) RUSI measures for abdominal muscles (transversus abdominis, internal oblique [IO], and external oblique [EO]). RESULTS: Patients did not produce systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even if patients had significant improvement in pain and disability. However, the correlational analyses between the absolute change (pre- to post-LSEP) (1) of EO and IO thickness (in mm) at rest (bilaterally), and (2) in pain following the LSEP were significant and consistent (range: .36-.45) in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although positive clinical improvements were observed following LSEP, there were minimal systematic changes in RUSI measures, likely because patients were not different from controls at baseline. Correlational analyses, however, indicated that greater reductions in pain were associated with reduced thickness of the EO and IO following the LSEP, suggesting the presence of some heterogeneity (or clinical subgroups) among the patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) aims to assess and classify patients into theoretically mutually exclusive subgroups, in order to direct treatment. However, the latest evidence for biopsychosocial influence-central sensitization (CS) and psychological distress-have not been assessed in conjunction with MDT. OBJECTIVES: (1) Determine the percentage of patients categorized into the MDT subgroups; (2) characterize the biopsychosocial clinical profile (presence of CS and psychological distress); and (3) identify associations between pain, disability, and biopsychosocial influences among this cohort. METHODS: Eighty four patients with chronic neck pain were recruited by 10 certified MDT therapists using a convenience (consecutive) sampling method. Patients were evaluated using MDT principles and also completed an online survey to measure CS (using the Central Sensitization Inventory [CSI]), pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. RESULTS: The proportions of the subgroups derangement (DER), dysfunction, postural and 'other' were 74.4, 2.4, 1.2, 20.7%, respectively. CS was observed in 62% of our sample (CSI score ≥ 40). CS was also observed in 64.7% of patients of the DER subgroup. Almost half of our sample (47.8%) demonstrated the co-occurrence of CS and DER, while 38% presented with DER syndrome, CS, and kinesiophobia. CONCLUSION: The majority of our patients were classified as DER; they also presented with high levels of CS and/or psychological distress. This suggests that MDT mechanical subgroups, particularly DER, can present with co-occurring biopsychosocial influences. Without assessing CS and psychological distress, MDT therapists may miss crucial information. Further research is required to determine the optimal management of patients presenting with mechanical and non-mechanical drivers of pain.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) produce positive effects on clinical outcomes, but the underlying mechanisms remain relatively unexplored. Psychological and neuromuscular mechanisms can be involved, such as a better activation of the lumbar multifidus, which represents one possibility. OBJECTIVES: To determine the following: (1) the effect of an LSEP on lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and activation, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), in patients with low back pain (LBP); (2) the correlation between RUSI measures and any change in clinical outcomes following the LSEP; and (3) the reliability of RUSI measures in control subjects over 8 weeks. DESIGN: One-arm clinical trial with healthy subjects as a control group; reliability study. SETTING: LSEP delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes measured in a laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34 patients with nonacute LBP and 28 healthy control subjects. METHODS: Outcomes were measured before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and at the same time interval (without treatment, to assess reliability) in control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pain numeric rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index (function), as well as RUSI measures for the lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles at 3 vertebral levels (L5-S1, L4-5, and L3-4) during rest (static) and dynamic contractions (percent thickness change). RESULTS: Patients did not show systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even though RUSI impairments were observed at baseline (dynamic measure at L5-S1) and even though patients had significant improvements in pain and disability. Correlational analyses with these clinical outcomes suggested that patients had reduced muscle thickness at baseline that was associated with a greater reduction in disability following LSEP; however, LM activation measured at baseline showed the opposite. Static RUSI measures showed excellent reliability at the L4-5 and L3-4 levels, whereas dynamic measures were not reliable. CONCLUSIONS: Patients showed less muscle activation than controls at baseline (L5-S1 level), but the LSEP did not normalize this impairment. The links between RUSI measures and the change in clinical outcomes during LSEP should be further explored. This clinical trial has been recorded in the International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy Number (ISRCTN) registry (ID: ISRCTN94152969). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar stabilization exercises have gained popularity and credibility in patients with non-acute low back pain. Previous research provides more support to strength/resistance and coordination/stabilisation programs. Some authors also suggest adding strength/resistance training following motor control exercises. However, the effect of such a lumbar stabilization program on lumbar proprioception has never been tested so far. The present study investigated the effects of an 8-week stabilization exercise program on lumbar proprioception in patients with low back pain (LBP) and assessed the 8-week test-retest reliability of lumbar proprioception in control subjects. METHODS: Lumbar proprioception was measured before and after an 8-week lumbar stabilization exercise program for patients with LBP. Control subjects participated in the same protocol but received no treatment. RESULTS: The lumbar proprioception measure showed moderate reliability. Patients with LBP and control subjects demonstrated no differences in lumbar proprioception at baseline. Participants from both groups showed better proprioception following the 8-week interval, demonstrating the presence of learning between testing days. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement of lumbar proprioception seen in both groups was ascribed to motor learning of the test itself. The effect of lumbar stabilization exercises on lumbar proprioception remains unknown because the LBP group did not show lumbar proprioception impairments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To (1) assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of different ultrasound (US) measures of the lumbar multifidus muscle in subjects with and without chronic low back pain and (2) test 3 different ways to enhance reliability, that is, by testing different tasks, using a template, and averaging trials within or between days. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures design. SETTING: Laboratory setting. PATIENTS: Fifteen subjects with chronic low back pain and 15 control subjects. METHODS: Subjects (n = 30) performed contralateral arm lifting and contralateral leg lifting while in the prone position. Two 7-second videos of the lumbar multifidus (from rest to contraction) were collected with and without a template (transparency) to reposition the transducer on the skin. One of the two raters repeated the testing 7 to 14 days later to assess intrarater reliability in addition to inter-rater reliability. Reliability was assessed with the generalizability theory as a framework. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: US imaging measures of the lumbar multifidus thickness were obtained in patients at rest and during standardized contractions (hereafter called primary measures) at 2 vertebral levels and on both sides. These primary measures were used to calculate different, potentially useful US parameters (hereafter called derived measures). RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was better than inter-rater reliability, and primary measures were more reliable than derived measures. The tasks investigated showed comparable reliability results, and the use of the transducer position template was not effective to increase reliability. Averaging the measures of 3 images increased reliability substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal reliability requires the use of a single rater and the averaging of at least 3 images per visit. In these conditions, primary measures reach acceptable levels of reliability, which was more difficult to achieve for most derived measures. Arm or leg lifting tasks showed similar reliability, and thus the arm-lifting task is recommended for comparisons with previous studies. The use of a transducer position template is not recommended.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of ultrasound (US) measures of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle in a sample of subjects with and without specific chronic low back pain and to test whether reliability is enhanced by using different abdominal muscle activation tasks, with use of a foam cube for US transducer stabilization or by averaging 3 measures on the same image. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures design. SETTING: Laboratory setting. PATIENTS: Fifteen subjects with chronic low back pain and 15 control subjects. METHODS: Subjects (n = 30) performed 3 tasks in the supine position: (1) contralateral straight leg raise (SLR), (2) bilateral hook-lying leg raising (HLR), and (3) abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) (control subjects only). Two 7-second videos of the right and left abdominal wall (from rest to contraction) were collected, with and without use of the foam cube. One of the 2 raters repeated the testing 7 to 14 days later to assess intrarater reliability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: US imaging of abdominal muscles thickness. RESULTS: The TrA muscle was recruited preferentially in the ADIM task compared with the automatic tasks (SLR and HLR). The reliability was comparable among the 3 tasks, with intrarater reliability results being better than interrater reliability results. The use of the foam cube or averaging measures on the same image was generally not effective to increase reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Although they are not as preferential in TrA recruitment as the ADIM, the SLR and HLR tasks showed comparable reliability results. The foam cube used to control transducer orientation and pressure and averaging measures on the same image had limited effect on reliability.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Uncertainty surrounds prognostic factors after whiplash injury. Previously we identified a prognostic model for 6-month pain-related disability in a cohort of 80 participants with acute whiplash. Predictors included initial disability, older age, decreased cold pain thresholds, decreased neck rotation movement, posttraumatic stress symptoms and decreased sympathetic vasoconstriction. The objective of this study was to externally validate this model. In a multicentre inception cohort study, 286 participants with acute whiplash (I, II or III) were assessed at <3 weeks and 12 months after injury. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was the outcome. Observed and predicted NDI scores were generated using the published equation of the original model. Model discrimination between participants with no or mild disability from those with moderate to severe disability was examined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Initial NDI and cold pain threshold predicted current observed 12-month NDI scores (r(2) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.58). There was a significant site effect, and the estimated marginal mean ± SE of 12-month NDI for Iceland (27.6 ± 1.79%) was higher than the other 3 sites (Melbourne 11.2 ± 5.03%, Canada 16.4 ± 2.36%, Brisbane 16.8 ± 1.17%). After adjusting for site, age and Impact of Events Scale scores regained significance (r(2) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.64). The tested model was not precise in predicting NDI as a continuous variable. However, it found good accuracy to discriminate participants with moderate to severe disability at 12 months (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.84-0.94], P<.001) which is clinically useful.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement, validity and intrarater reliability study. OBJECTIVES: (1) To confirm the validity and assess between-day test-retest reliability of cervical spine motion measurements made with the cervical range of motion (CROM) device in flexion, extension, bilateral rotation, and bilateral side flexion; (2) to provide meaningful information to clinicians about the standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change for the CROM device. BACKGROUND: Range of motion is a common outcome measure used in the assessment of the cervical spine. The CROM device is one of the tools used to measure cervical range of motion in the clinical setting. However, its psychometric properties are not well established, especially for measurements taken on separate days. METHODS: Quasi-experimental design with 1 group comparison. Twenty healthy adults (9 men and 11 women) participated in this study. Cervical range of motion was simultaneously recorded with the CROM device and the Fastrak motion analysis system for all 6 cervical movements mentioned above. The CROM device was placed on the participant's head consistent with standard clinical procedures. Two Fastrak sensors were positioned with 1 on the forehead and 1 over the spinous process of the T6 vertebra. Test-retest reliability of measurements made with the CROM device was assessed, as well as its standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change, with measures taken on 2 separate days spaced 48 hours apart. RESULTS: Values obtained by the 2 measuring devices yielded Pearson correlation coefficients ranging between 0.93 and 0.98. Test-retest reliability of measurements of cervical range of motion using the CROM was found to be good, with ICCs ranging between 0.89 and 0.98. The standard errors of measurement across the 6 movements ranged from 1.6 degrees to 2.8 degrees and the minimal detectable changes across the 6 movements ranged from 3.6 degrees to 6.5 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: The measurements made with the CROM were shown to be reliable in all movement directions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40(5):318-323, Epub 12 March 2010. doi:10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The mechanisms underlying sensory hypersensitivity (SH) in acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD) are not well understood. We examined the extent of the relationships between the sensory measures of pressure pain threshold (PPT) and cold pain threshold (CPT), catastrophizing, pain and disability levels and gender in acute WAD. Thirty-seven subjects reporting neck pain following a motor vehicle accident were examined within five weeks post-injury. Measures of neck pain and disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI) and catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, PCS) were taken. CPT was assessed in the cervical spine and PPTs were assessed in the cervical spine (PPTcx) and at a remote site (PPTdistal). CPT and PCS were moderately correlated (r=0.46; p < 0.01); however there were no significant relationships between PPT (cervical and distal) and PCS. Both CPT (r=0.55, p < 0.01) and PPTcx (r=-0.42, p < 0.01) were significantly correlated with NDI but PPTdistal was not (r=-0.08, p=0.65). Finally, gender modulated the relationships between sensory measures, catastrophizing, and pain and disability levels. In conclusion, subjects with higher levels of catastrophizing presented with sensory hypersensitivity to cold stimuli in the acute phase of whiplash. Differences between genders are in accordance with the growing body of evidence suggesting that the relationships between some psychological factors and injury-related symptoms are modulated by gender.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study using a cross-sectional, repeated-measures design. OBJECTIVES: To quantify maximal voluntary isometric neck forces in healthy subjects and individuals with whiplash-associated disorder (WAD), using an objective measurement system to evaluate the test-retest properties of these strength measurements and to assess the links between neck strength, pain, kinesiophobia, and catastrophizing in patients with WAD. BACKGROUND: The prognosis of WAD is difficult to predict due to a lack of objective measurement methods and to our limited understanding of the role of psychological factors in the development of chronic WAD symptoms. METHODS AND MEASURES: Fourteen subjects with chronic WAD grade I or II and an age-matched, healthy group (n = 28) participated in this study. Cervical strength was measured with the Multi-Cervical Unit (MCU) in 6 directions, and pain was measured with a visual analog scale. Individuals in the WAD group completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). RESULTS: Significant deficits in strength were observed for the individuals in the WAD group compared to the healthy group, particularly in extension, retraction, and left lateral flexion (P<.05). The MCU demonstrated good intratester reliability for the healthy group (ICC = 0.80-0.92) and the WAD group (ICC = 0.85-0.98), and small standard errors of measurement for both groups. No significant association was found between neck strength and NDI, TSK, and PCS. CONCLUSION: The MCU demonstrated good test-retest properties for healthy subjects and individuals with WAD. Cervical strength was lower in individuals with WAD; however, the strength deficits were not clearly linked with psychological factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that increased fatigue of neck muscles could be related to neck pain. However, studies on the matter present contradicting results which could be explained by the different test positions used. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of test position on muscle fatigue of neck flexor and extensor muscles in healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-five women without neck pain sustained neck flexion and neck extension isometric contractions at 25% and 75% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in two test positions: sitting and supine lying. Using surface electromyography, the change over time of the median frequency of the power spectrum (MDF slope) of the myoelectric signal of the sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles was measured and compared between both positions. RESULTS: At 75% MVC, splenius capitis muscles presented higher fatigue in lying compared to sitting, while sternocleidomastoid demonstrated no difference between positions. No statistically significant effect of test position was found at 25% MVC for both sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles as they generally did not present myoelectric manifestations of fatigue. CONCLUSION: These results underline the need to standardise the test position when investigating neck muscle fatigue, especially for neck extensors at high loads.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evidence-based practice aims to improve patient care and service delivery, particularly in the management of individuals with low back pain (LBP), the largest client group seen by outpatient physical therapists. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of use of interventions with evidence of effectiveness in the management of acute nonspecific LBP by physical therapists. SUBJECTS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 physical therapists working with patients with LBP. METHODS: Using a telephone-administered interview, therapists described their current and desired treatment practices for a typical case of LBP. Each intervention reported was coded according to its evidence of effectiveness (strong, moderate, limited, or none). Information on clinician, workplace, and client characteristics also was obtained. RESULTS: The prevalence of use of interventions with strong or moderate evidence of effectiveness was 68%. However, 90% to 96% of therapists also used interventions for which research evidence was limited or absent. Users of interventions with high evidence of effectiveness, as compared with nonusers, had graduated more recently and had taken a higher number of postgraduate clinical courses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although most therapists use interventions with high evidence of effectiveness, much of their patient time is spent on interventions that are not well reported in the literature. The results indicate the need for improvement in the quality of clinical research as well as its dissemination and implementation in a way that is appealing to therapists, such as through practice-related courses.

Asunto(s)