Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Bone Jt Open ; 2(11): 932-939, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34766825

RESUMEN

AIMS: Physician burnout and its consequences have been recognized as increasingly prevalent and important issues for both organizations and individuals involved in healthcare delivery. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the patterns of self-reported wellness in orthopaedic surgeons and trainees from multiple nations with varying health systems. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 774 orthopaedic surgeons and trainees in five countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, and USA) was conducted in 2019. Respondents were asked to complete the Mayo Clinic Well-Being Index and the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index in addition to 31 personal/demographic questions and 27 employment-related questions via an anonymous online survey. RESULTS: A total of 684 participants from five countries (Australia (n = 74), Canada (n = 90), New Zealand (n = 69), UK (n = 105), and USA (n = 346)) completed both of the risk assessment questionnaires (Mayo and Stanford). Of these, 42.8% (n = 293) were trainees and 57.2% (n = 391) were attending surgeons. On the Mayo Clinic Well-Being Index, 58.6% of the overall sample reported feeling burned out (n = 401). Significant differences were found between nations with regards to the proportion categorized as being at risk for poor outcomes (27.5% for New Zealand (19/69) vs 54.4% for Canada (49/90) ; p = 0.001). On the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index, 38.9% of the respondents were classified as being burned out (266/684). Prevalence of burnout ranged from 27% for Australia (20/74 up to 47.8% for Canadian respondents (43/90; p = 0.010). Younger age groups (20 to 29: RR 2.52 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39 to 4.58; p = 0.002); 30 to 39: RR 2.40 (95% CI 1.36 to 4.24; p = 0.003); 40 to 49: RR 2.30 (95% CI 1.35 to 3.9; p = 0.002)) and trainee status (RR 1.53 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.03 p = 0.004)) were independently associated with increased relative risk of having a 'at-risk' or 'burnout' score. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of self-reported burnout and risk for poor outcomes among orthopaedic surgeons and trainees varies between countries but remains unacceptably high throughout. Both individual and health system characteristics contribute to physician wellness and should be considered in the development of strategies to improve surgeon wellbeing. Level of Evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):932-939.

3.
J Orthop Res ; 37(3): 655-664, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30604892

RESUMEN

In dysplastic infant hips undergoing abduction harness treatment, cartilage contact pressure is believed to have a role in therapeutic cartilage remodeling and also in the complication of femoral head avascular necrosis. To improve our understanding of the role of contact pressure in the remodeling and the complication, we modeled cartilage contact pressure in cartilaginous infant hips undergoing Pavlik harness treatment. In subject-specific finite element modeling, we simulated contact pressure of normal and dysplastic hips in Pavlik harness at 90° flexion and gravity-induced abduction angles of 40°, 60° and 80°. We demonstrated that morphologies of acetabulum and femoral head both affected contact pressure distributions. The simulations showed that in Pavlik harness, contact pressure was mainly distributed along anterior and posterior acetabulum, leaving the acetabular roof only lightly loaded (normal hip) or unloaded (dysplastic hip). From a mechanobiological perspective, these conditions may contribute to therapeutic remodeling of the joint in Pavlik harness. Furthermore, contact pressure increased with the angle of abduction, until at the extreme abduction angle (80°), the lateral femoral head also contacted the posterior acetabular edge. Contact pressure in this area could contribute to femoral head avascular necrosis by reducing flow in femoral head blood vessels. The contact pressure we simulated can plausibly account for both the therapeutic effects and main adverse effect of abduction harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/fisiopatología , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Modelación Específica para el Paciente , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/terapia , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino
4.
Eur Radiol ; 29(3): 1489-1495, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30159618

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) diagnosis by two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) can have poor inter-rater reliability. 3D ultrasound (3DUS) may be more reliably performed, particularly by novice users. We compared intra- and inter-rater reliability between expert and novice operators performing 2DUS and 3DUS for DDH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infants with suspected DDH were assessed with 2DUS and 3DUS. Novice operators had 1.5 h of training and Experts had 5-15 years' experience. Images included two 2DUS static and two 3DUS sweep images per operator. Image quality was assessed by 5-point system (yes/no: full femoral head; full acetabular roof; horizontal iliac wing; os ischium; absent motion/artifact). 2DUS indices (alpha angle, coverage) were measured centrally by a blinded reader with 2 years DDH US experience. 3DUS was post-processed by semi-automated custom software generating acetabular surface models, indices and estimated probability of DDH. Gold-standard diagnosis of each hip as normal, borderline or dysplastic was based on radiologist review of expert 2DUS. RESULTS: Thirty infants, mean age 10.8 weeks were enrolled. Quality scores were 2.7±1.2 Novice versus 4.9±0.3 Expert for 2DUS (p = 0.04), and 4.2±1.0 Novice versus 4.9±0.3 Expert for 3DUS (p = 0.99). Inter-rater reliability was poor for 2DUS (ICC=0.10 for alpha angle, 0.04 for acetabular coverage) and moderate to high for 3DUS (ICC=0.73-0.83 for alpha angle, 0.55 for acetabular coverage). Intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy was higher for 3DUS than 2DUS. CONCLUSION: Novice operators can perform 3DUS for DDH with reliability and accuracy approaching expert sonographers. Novices perform 2DUS with poor reliability and accuracy. KEY POINTS: • Novice/expert inter-rater reliability improved from poor with 2DUS to moderate/high with 3DUS. • Novice operators using 3DUS correctly classified 57/58 (98%) of infant hips. • DDH can be reliably assessed by novice operators using 3DUS.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Luxación Congénita de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Artefactos , Femenino , Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Ilion/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Isquion/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
5.
Radiology ; 287(3): 1003-1015, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29688160

RESUMEN

Purpose To validate accuracy of diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) from geometric properties of acetabular shape extracted from three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US). Materials and Methods In this retrospective multi-institutional study, 3D US was added to conventional two-dimensional (2D) US of 1728 infants (mean age, 67 days; age range, 3-238 days) evaluated for DDH from January 2013 to December 2016. Clinical diagnosis after more than 6 months follow-up was normal (n = 1347), borderline (Graf IIa, later normalizing spontaneously; n = 140) or dysplastic (Graf IIb or higher, n = 241). Custom software accessible through the institution's research portal automatically calculated indexes including 3D posterior and anterior alpha angle and osculating circle radius from hip surface models generated with less than 1 minute of user input. Logistic regression predicted clinical diagnosis (normal = 0, dysplastic = 1) from 3D indexes (ie, age and sex). Output represented probability of hip dysplasia from 0 to 1 (output: >0.9, dysplastic; 0.11-0.89, borderline; <0.1, normal). Software can be accessed through the research portal. Results Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was equivalently high for 3D US indexes and 2D US alpha angle (0.996 vs 0.987). Three-dimensional US helped to correctly categorize 97.5% (235 of 241) dysplastic and 99.4% (1339 of 1347) normal hips. No dysplastic hips were categorized as normal. Correct diagnosis was provided at initial 3D US scan in 69.3% (97 of 140) of the studies diagnosed as borderline at initial 2D US scans. Conclusion Automatically calculated 3D indexes of acetabular shape performed equivalently to high-quality 2D US scans at tertiary medical centers to help diagnose DDH. Three-dimensional US reduced the number of borderline studies requiring follow-up imaging by over two-thirds.


Asunto(s)
Luxación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Femenino , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(3): 121-126, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27984446

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Determine the proportion of subjects developing deep infection or nonunion after primary wound closure of open fractures (humerus, radius/ulna, femur, and tibia/fibula). Secondarily, a matched-series analysis compared outcomes with subjects who underwent delayed wound closure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2009 and 2013 of subjects undergoing primary closure. SETTING: Trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three (84 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Eighty-two (99%) subjects (83 fractures) provided follow-up data. Matching (age, sec, fracture location, and grade) was performed using study data of delayed wound closure undertaken at the same center between 2001 and 2009 (n = 68 matched subjects). INTERVENTION: Primary wound closure occurred when the fracture grade was Gustilo grade 3A or lower and the wound deemed clean at initial surgery. Standardized evaluations occurred until the fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were also undertaken at 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Deep infection is defined as infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy after wound closure; nonunion is defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing 1-year after fracture. RESULTS: Three (4%) subjects had deep infections, whereas 10 (12%) subjects developed nonunion in the primary closure cohort. In the matched analyses [n = 68 pairs; (136 subjects)], the primary closure cohort had fewer deep infections [n = 3 (4%) vs. n = 6 (9%)] and nonunions [n = 9 (13%) vs. n = 19 (29%)] than the delayed closure cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary wound closure after an open fracture appears acceptable in appropriately selected patients and may reduce the risk of deep infection and nonunion compared with delayed closure; a definitive randomized trial is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mal Unidas/epidemiología , Fracturas Mal Unidas/prevención & control , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta/epidemiología , Causalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(3): 149-55, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26544953

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with developing nonunion or delayed healing after open fracture. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2001 and 2009. SETTING: Three level 1 Canadian trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred thirty-six (791 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Six hundred eighty-nine (94%) subjects (739 fractures) provided adequate outcome data. INTERVENTION: Subjects were followed until fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were conducted 1 year after fracture. Patient, fracture, and injury information, and time to surgery and antibiotics were recorded during hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunion defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing at 1 year and delayed healing defined as 2 consecutive clinical assessments showing no radiographic progression or incomplete radiographic healing between 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: There were 413 (52%) tibia/fibular, 285 (36%) upper extremity, and 93 (13%) femoral fractures. Nonunion developed in 124 (17%) and delayed healing in 63 (8%) fractures. The median time to surgery was not different for fractures that developed nonunion compared with those who did not (P = 0.36). Deep infection [Odd ratio (OR) 12.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.07-26.8], grade 3A fractures (OR 2.49; 95% CI, 1.30-4.78), and smoking (OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.76) were significantly associated with developing a nonunion. Delayed healing was also significantly associated with deep infection (OR 4.34; 95% CI, 1.22-15.48) and grade 3B/C fractures (OR 3.69; 95% CI, 1.44-9.44). Multivariate regression found no association between nonunion and time to surgery (P = 0.15) or antibiotics (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Deep infection and higher Gustilo grade fractures were associated with nonunion and delayed healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas Mal Unidas/epidemiología , Fracturas Mal Unidas/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
8.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 36(2): 126-31, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25730292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of topical liposomal lidocaine in reducing the pain perceived by children undergoing percutaneous intraosseous pin (PP) removal in the outpatient orthopaedic clinic. METHODS: A triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing topical liposomal lidocaine to a placebo was conducted at the Stollery Children's Hospital between September 2008 and February 2011. Subjects undergoing the removal of PP in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic between ages 3 and 16 years were recruited. A computer-generated variable-block randomization scheme was used to determine each subject's group assignment. Pain was recorded just before randomization and immediately after the procedure using the Oucher Scale (for subjects) and a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (for parents and an observing orthopaedic technician). In a subset of individuals, follow-up telephone calls were made 24 hours postprocedure to inquire about any adverse event from the use of the topical liposomal lidocaine. Data were analyzed using the Student t test. RESULTS: Of a total of 296 recruited subjects, complete data were available on 281 subjects (140 intervention and 141 control). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to baseline characteristics, including preprocedure pain scores. Although postprocedure pain scores demonstrated an increase in pain in both groups (2.3 points in the treatment group and 2.0 points in the placebo group), no statistically significant difference was seen in postprocedure pain scores between groups (P=0.81). No adverse events were observed or reported. CONCLUSIONS: Topically applied liposomal lidocaine was not effective in reducing pain during this procedure, compared with a placebo. However, this study demonstrates that PP removal is a painful procedure in children. Given the large volume of patients who undergo this procedure and the long-term consequences of experiencing painful procedures in childhood, it is important to find safe and fast-acting methods to decrease procedural pain associated with PP removal.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Clavos Ortopédicos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor/prevención & control , Administración Tópica , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Escala Visual Analógica
9.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 35(5): 536-45, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494022

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthopaedics is a topic of considerable importance, as RCTs play a major role in guiding clinical practice. The quality of RCTs published between 1995 and 2005 has previously been documented. The purpose of the current study was to assess and describe the quality of pediatric orthopaedic RCTs published from 2005 to 2012, by identifying study characteristics associated with higher quality and outlining areas for improvement. METHODS: A standardized literature search was used to identify pediatric orthopaedic RCTs published in 7 well-recognized journals between September 2005 and July 2012 inclusive. The Detsky Quality Assessment Scale and the CONSORT checklist for Non-Pharmacologic Trials were used to assess the quality of the RCTs. Scores for the Detsky and CONSORT were calculated by 2 independent blinded orthopaedic surgeon reviewers with epidemiologic training. RESULTS: Forty RCTs were included in this analysis. The mean percentage score on the Detsky quality scale was 67%. Sixteen (40%) of the articles satisfied the threshold for a satisfactory level of methodological quality (Detsky >75%). Twenty-five (63%) of these studies were negative studies, concluding no difference between treatment arms. In 52% of the negative studies, an a priori sample size analysis was absent, and 28% were self-described as underpowered. In multiple variable regression analysis, only working with a statistician was significantly associated with higher Detsky percentage scores (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a trend for improving quality in pediatric orthopaedic RCTs. Compared with past reports, the mean Detsky score improved from 53% to 67%, and the proportion meeting an acceptable level of quality improved from 19% to 40%. One of the most concerning findings of this study was the lack of attention to sample size and power analysis, and the potential for underpowered studies. Ongoing efforts are necessary to improve the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics. SIGNIFICANCE: Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, JPO, and POSNA are working toward improving levels of quality in pediatric orthopaedic research. This paper highlights progress that has been made, and addresses some high-yield areas for future improvement.


Asunto(s)
Ortopedia/métodos , Pediatría/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Bibliometría , Lista de Verificación , Niño , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Tamaño de la Muestra
10.
J Orthop Trauma ; 28(11): 613-9, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25050748

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between time to surgery, antibiotic administration, Gustilo grade, fracture location, and development of deep infection in open fractures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2001 and 2009. SETTING: Three Level 1 Canadian trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 736 (791 fractures) subjects were enrolled and 686 subjects (93%; 737 fractures) provided adequate follow-up data (1-year interview and/or clinical follow-up >90 days). INTERVENTION: Demographics, injury information, time to surgery, and antibiotics were recorded. Subjects were evaluated using standardized data forms until the fracture(s) healed. Phone interviews were undertaken 1 year after the fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Tibia/fibula fractures were most common (n = 413, 52%), followed by upper extremity (UE) (n = 285, 36%), and femoral (n = 93, 12%) fractures. Infection developed in 46 fractures (6%). The median time to surgery was 9 hours 4 minutes (interquartile range, 6 hours 39 minutes to 12 hours 33 minutes) and 7 hours 39 minutes (interquartile range, 6 hours 10 minutes to 9 hours 54 minutes) for those without and with infection, respectively (P = 0.04). Gustilo grade 3B/3C fractures accounted for 17 of 46 infections (37%) (P < 0.001). Four UE (1.5%), 7 femoral (8%), and 35 tibia/fibula (9%) fractures developed infections (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression found no association between infection and time to surgery [odds ratio (OR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.90-1.06] or antibiotics (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05). Grades 3A (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 1.37-29.56) and 3B/3C (OR, 12.87; 95% CI, 2.72-60.95) relative to grade 1 injuries and tibia/fibula (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.33-11.53) relative to UE fractures were significantly associated with infection. CONCLUSION: Infection after open fracture was associated with increasing Gustilo grade or tibia/fibula fractures but not time to surgery or antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level I. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Desbridamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 27(5): 573-81, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17585270

RESUMEN

The promotion and practice of evidence-based medicine necessitates a critical evaluation of medical literature, including the criterion standard of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Recent studies have examined the quality of RCTs in various surgical specialties, but no study has focused on pediatric orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was to assess and describe the quality of RCTs published in the last 10 years in journals with high clinical impact in pediatric orthopaedics. All of the RCTs in pediatric orthopaedics published in 5 well-recognized journals between 1995 and 2005 were reviewed using the Detsky Quality Assessment Scale. The mean percentage score on the Detsky scale was 53% (95% confidence interval, 46%-60%). Only 7 (19%) of the articles satisfied the threshold for a satisfactory level of methodological quality (Detsky >75%). Most RCTs in pediatric orthopaedics that are published in well-recognized peer-reviewed journals demonstrate substantial deficiencies in methodological quality. Particular areas of weakness include inadequate rigor and reporting of randomization methods, use of inappropriate or poorly described outcome measures, inadequate description of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and inappropriate statistical analysis. Further efforts are necessary to improve the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in this field to avoid inadvertent misinformation of the clinical community.


Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Ortopedia/normas , Pediatría/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Niño , Humanos , Revisión de la Investigación por Pares , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/normas , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/normas , Control de Calidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
J Orthop Trauma ; 16(7): 484-90, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12172278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between time to definitive surgical management and the rates of nonunion and infection in open fractures resulting from blunt trauma. To determine the association of other clinical determinants with these same adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective review of a consecutive series of open long bone fractures. SETTING: Referral trauma center with transport times often extending beyond eight hours from the time of injury. PATIENTS: A total of 227 skeletally mature patients with 241 open long bone fractures were treated between January 1996 and December 1998; 215 fractures were available for review at a minimum of twelve months postinjury. INTERVENTION: Medical charts of all patients were reviewed using a standardized data collection form. All available records and radiograph reports were inspected. All cases were followed to clinical and radiographic union of the fracture or until a definitive procedure for nonunion or deep infection was carried out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of deep infections or nonunions after fracture treatment. RESULTS: The mean time to definitive treatment was eight hours and twenty-five minutes (range 1 hour 35 minutes to 30 hours 40 minutes). Forty patients went on to nonunion, and twenty developed a deep infection. In the final multivariate regression model, time was not a significant factor in predicting either nonunion or infection (p > 0.05). The strongest determinants for nonunion were found to be presence of infection and grade of injury (p < 0.05). The strongest predictors for the development of a deep infection were fracture grade and a lower extremity fracture (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing an adverse outcome was not increased by aggressive debridement/lavage and definitive fixation up to thirteen hours from the time of injury when early prophylactic antibiotic administration and open fracture first aid were instituted.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur/complicaciones , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas Mal Unidas/etiología , Fracturas Abiertas/complicaciones , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Fracturas del Radio/complicaciones , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas del Cúbito/complicaciones , Fracturas del Cúbito/cirugía , Infección de Heridas/etiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA