RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Peer review of head and neck cancer radiation therapy target volumes by radiologists was introduced in our center to optimize target volume delineation. Our aim was to assess the impact of MR imaging-based radiologist peer review of head and neck radiation therapy gross tumor and nodal volumes, through qualitative and quantitative analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases undergoing radical radiation therapy with a coregistered MR imaging, between April 2019 and March 2020, were reviewed. The frequency and nature of volume changes were documented, with major changes classified as per the guidance of The Royal College of Radiologists. Volumetric alignment was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. RESULTS: Fifty cases were reviewed between April 2019 and March 2020. The median age was 59 years (range, 29-83 years), and 72% were men. Seventy-six percent of gross tumor volumes and 41.5% of gross nodal volumes were altered, with 54.8% of gross tumor volume and 66.6% of gross nodal volume alterations classified as "major." Undercontouring of soft-tissue involvement and unidentified lymph nodes were predominant reasons for change. Radiologist review significantly altered the size of both the gross tumor volume (P = .034) and clinical target tumor volume (P = .003), but not gross nodal volume or clinical target nodal volume. The median conformity and surface distance metrics were the following: gross tumor volume Dice similarity coefficient = 0.93 (range, 0.82-0.96), Jaccard index = 0.87 (range, 0.7-0.94), Hausdorff distance = 7.45 mm (range, 5.6-11.7 mm); and gross nodular tumor volume Dice similarity coefficient = 0.95 (0.91-0.97), Jaccard index = 0.91 (0.83-0.95), and Hausdorff distance = 20.7 mm (range, 12.6-41.6). Conformity improved on gross tumor volume-to-clinical target tumor volume expansion (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.93 versus 0.95, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging-based radiologist review resulted in major changes to most radiotherapy target volumes and significant changes in volume size of both gross tumor volume and clinical target tumor volume, suggesting that this is a fundamental step in the radiotherapy workflow of patients with head and neck cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Revisión por Pares , Radiólogos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Carga Tumoral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We explored whether there was a difference between measurements obtained with CT and MRI for the diagnosis of large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomaly, and whether this influenced diagnosis on the basis of previously published threshold values (Valvassori and Cincinnati). We also investigated whether isolated dilated extra-osseous endolymphatic sac occurred on MRI. Secondary objectives were to compare inter-observer reproducibility for the measurements, and to investigate any mismatch between the diagnoses using the different criteria. MATERIALS/METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomalies were retrospectively analysed. For subjects with both CT and MRI available (n = 58), two independent observers measured the midpoint and operculum widths. For subjects with MRI (± CT) available (n = 84), extra-osseous sac widths were also measured. Results There was no significant difference between the width measurements obtained with CT versus MRI. CT alone diagnosed large vestibular aqueduct syndrome or large endolymphatic sac anomalies in 2/58 (Valvassori) and 4/58 (Cincinnati), whilst MRI alone diagnosed them in 2/58 (Valvassori). There was 93% CT/MRI diagnostic agreement using both criteria. Only 1/84 demonstrated isolated extra-osseous endolymphatic sac dilatation. The MRI-based LVAS/LESA diagnosis was less dependent on which criteria were used. Midpoint measurements are more reproducible between observers and between CT/MR imaging modalities. CONCLUSION: Supplementing MRI with CT results in additional diagnoses using either criterion, however, there is no net increased diagnostic sensitivity for CT versus MRI when applying the Valvassori criteria. Isolated enlargement of the extra-osseous endolymphatic sac is rare.
Asunto(s)
Saco Endolinfático/anomalías , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Acueducto Vestibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vestibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Saco Endolinfático/diagnóstico por imagen , Saco Endolinfático/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertrofia/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , SíndromeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We report a missed case of otosyphilis presenting as otic capsule lucencies on temporal bone computed tomography. METHODS: A 58-year-old woman presented with a 15-year history of bilateral, mixed hearing loss together with otic capsule lucencies, subsequently confirmed as otosyphilis. A literature review of otosyphilis was undertaken based on a PubMed search of studies published between 1988 and 2012, using the key words 'otosyphilis', 'otodystrophy', 'otic capsule lucencies' and 'luetic osteitis'. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Although rare, otosyphilis is important to recognise as it is one of the few treatable causes of deafness when diagnosed early. The differentiating computed tomography features of luetic osteitis (otosyphilis) of the temporal bone have only rarely been described. We emphasise how these imaging features can be used to distinguish the rare but treatable condition of luetic osteitis from other, more common conditions with similar imaging findings.