Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
2.
Mol Psychiatry ; 14(7): 728-37, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18283278

RESUMEN

This study presents national data on the comparative role impairments of common mental and chronic medical disorders in the general population. These data come from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative household survey. Disorder-specific role impairment was assessed with the Sheehan Disability Scales, a multidimensional instrument that asked respondents to attribute impairment to particular conditions. Overall impairment was significantly higher for mental than chronic medical disorders in 74% of pair-wise comparisons between the two groups of conditions, and severe impairment was reported by a significantly higher portion of persons with mental disorders (42.0%) than chronic medical disorders (24.4%). However, treatment was provided for a significantly lower proportion of mental (21.4%) than chronic medical (58.2%) disorders. Although mental disorders were associated with comparable or higher impairment than chronic medical conditions in all domains of function, they showed different patterns of deficits; whereas chronic medical disorders were most likely to be associated with impairment in domains of work and home functioning, mental disorders were most commonly associated with problems in social and close-relation domains. Comorbidity between chronic medical and mental disorders significantly increased the reported impairment associated with each type of disorder. The results indicate a serious mismatch between a high degree of impairment and a low rate of treatment for mental disorders in the United States. Efforts to reduce disability will need to address the disproportionate burden and distinct patterns of deficits of mental disorders and the potentially synergistic impact of comorbid mental and chronic medical disorders.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(9): 861-8, 2001 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial evaluated an integrated model of primary medical care for a cohort of patients with serious mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 120 individuals enrolled in a Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health clinic were randomized to receive primary medical care through an integrated care initiative located in the mental health clinic (n = 59) or through the VA general medicine clinic (n = 61). Veterans who obtained care in the integrated care clinic received on-site primary care and case management that emphasized preventive medical care, patient education, and close collaboration with mental health providers to improve access to and continuity of care. Analyses compared health process (use of medical services, quality of care, and satisfaction) and outcomes (health and mental health status and costs) between the groups in the year after randomization. RESULTS: Patients treated in the integrated care clinic were significantly more likely to have made a primary care visit and had a greater mean number of primary care visits than those in the usual care group. They were more likely to have received 15 of the 17 preventive measures outlined in clinical practice guidelines. Patients assigned to the integrated care clinic had a significantly greater improvement in health as measured by the physical component summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey than patients assigned to the general medicine clinic (4.7 points vs -0.3 points, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the measures of mental health symptoms or in total health care costs. CONCLUSION: On-site, integrated primary care was associated with improved quality and outcomes of medical care.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/normas , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(6): 565-72, 2001 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11386985

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether differences in quality of medical care might explain a portion of the excess mortality associated with mental disorders in the year after myocardial infarction. METHODS: This study examined a national cohort of 88 241 Medicare patients 65 years and older who were hospitalized for clinically confirmed acute myocardial infarction. Proportional hazard models compared the association between mental disorders and mortality before and after adjusting 5 established quality indicators: reperfusion, aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and smoking cessation counseling. All models adjusted for eligibility for each procedure, demographic characteristics, cardiac risk factors and history, admission characteristics, left ventricular function, hospital characteristics, and regional factors. RESULTS: After adjusting for the potential confounding factors, presence of any mental disorder was associated with a 19% increase in 1-year risk of mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.36). After adding the 5 quality measures to the model, the association was no longer significant (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.26). Similarly, while schizophrenia (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67) and major affective disorders (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20) were each initially associated with increased mortality, after adding the quality variables, neither schizophrenia (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.86-1.60) nor major affective disorder (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23) remained a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in quality of medical care seemed to explain a substantial portion of the excess mortality experienced by patients with mental disorders after myocardial infarction. The study suggests the potential importance of improving these patients' medical care as a step toward reducing their excess mortality.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Trastornos Mentales/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Reperfusión Miocárdica , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Función Ventricular Izquierda
5.
Am J Psychiatry ; 158(5): 731-4, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11329394

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The relationship of depressive symptoms, satisfaction with health care, and 2-year work outcomes was examined in a national cohort of employees. METHOD: A total of 6,239 employees of three corporations completed surveys on health and satisfaction with health care in 1993 and 1995. This study used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the relationships of depressive symptoms (a score below 43 on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey mental component summary), satisfaction with a variety of dimensions of health care in 1993, and work outcomes (sick days and decreased effectiveness in the workplace) in 1995. RESULTS: The odds of missed work due to health problems in 1995 were twice as high for employees with depressive symptoms in both 1993 and 1995 as for those without depressive symptoms in either year. The odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995 was seven times as high. Among individuals with depressive symptoms in 1993, a report of one or more problems with clinical care in 1993 predicted a 34% increase in the odds of persistent depressive symptoms and a 66% increased odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995. There was a weaker association between problems with plan administration and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive disorders in the workplace persist over time and have a major effect on work performance, most notably on "presenteeism," or reduced effectiveness in the workplace. The study's findings suggest a potentially important link between consumers' perceptions of clinical care and work outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/normas , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Eficiencia , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/normas , Satisfacción Personal , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Estados Unidos , Trabajo/normas
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(3): 299-306, 2001 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11157418

RESUMEN

Few studies have addressed the accuracy of self-reported cancer history, although epidemiologic studies routinely use self-reported information as the sole source of exposure or outcome data or as a criterion for exclusion from study participation. In this paper, false-negative reporting of cancer history is examined in a community-based sample by comparing interview data with tumor registry records. Subjects were participants in the 1980 New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area study; in 1995, cancer records (from 1935 onward) were obtained by linking the sample to the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Analyses focused on 263 individuals who had at least one tumor reported to the Connecticut Tumor Registry prior to participation in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. The overall rate of false-negative reporting was 39.2%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that false-negative reporting was significantly associated with non-White race, older age, increased time since cancer diagnosis, number of previous tumors, and type of cancer treatment received. In addition, false-negative reporting varied widely by cancer site, ranging from 0% for melanoma skin cancer to 83.3% for central nervous system cancers. The false-negative rate for breast cancer was 20.8%, that for colon and prostate cancers was 42.1%, and that for bladder cancer was 61.5%. Implications of these findings for prevalence estimation and future epidemiologic studies are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Registros Médicos/normas , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Connecticut/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Distribución por Sexo
7.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 20(6): 233-41, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11816664

RESUMEN

Using a nationally representative sample of 23,230 U.S. residents, we examine patterns of economic burden across five chronic conditions: mood disorders, diabetes, heart disease, asthma, and hypertension. Almost half of U.S. health care costs in 1996 were borne by persons with one or more of these five conditions; of that spending amount, only about one-quarter was spent on treating the conditions themselves and the remainder on coexistent illnesses. Each condition demonstrated substantial economic burden but also unique characteristics and patterns of service use driving those costs. The findings highlight the differing challenges involved in understanding needs and improving care across particular chronic conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Gastos en Salud , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/economía , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/clasificación , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Recolección de Datos , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Política de Salud , Cardiopatías/economía , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertensión/economía , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Humor/economía , Trastornos del Humor/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(9): 1485-91, 2000 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10964866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of mental and general medical disabilities in the United States. METHOD: The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey of Disability was the largest disability survey ever conducted in the United States. A national sample was screened for disability, defined as limitation or inability to participate in a major life activity. Analyses compared cohorts who attributed their disability to physical, mental, or combined conditions. RESULTS: Of 106,573 adults, 1.1% reported functional disability from mental conditions, 4.8% from general medical conditions, and 1.2% from combined mental and general medical conditions. Disabilities attributed to a mental condition were predominantly associated with social and cognitive difficulties, those attributed to general medical conditions with physical limitations, and combined disabilities with deficits spanning multiple domains. In multivariate models, comorbid medical and mental conditions were associated with a twofold increase in odds of unemployment and a two-thirds increase in odds of support on disability payments compared to respondents with a single form of disability. More than half the nonworking disabled reported that economic, social, and job-based barriers contributed to their inability to work. One-fourth of working disabled people reported discrimination on the basis of their disability during the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An estimated three million Americans (one-third of disabled people) reported that a mental condition contributes to their disability. Mental, general medical, and combined conditions are associated with unique patterns of functional impairment. Social and economic factors and job discrimination may exacerbate the functional impairments resulting from clinical syndromes.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Escolaridad , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prejuicio , Prevalencia , Política Pública , Seguridad Social/economía , Bienestar Social/economía , Estereotipo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Psychiatr Serv ; 51(7): 890-2, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10875953

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological surveys suggest that half of mental disorders in the community are treated in general medical settings. This paper examines delivery of mental health services in psychiatric, primary care, and specialty medical clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated public-sector health care system in the United States. METHODS: The study examined all outpatient visits to VA clinics between October 1996 and March 1998, a time during which VA policy promoted a shift to a primary care model. For veterans with a primary diagnosis of a mental or substance use disorder who made any visit to a VA psychiatric, primary care, or specialty medical clinic, we compared the locus of care and case mix as well as changes in treatment patterns during the study period. RESULTS: Of 437,035 veterans treated for a mental disorder during the final six months of the study period, only 7 percent were seen for their mental disorders exclusively in primary care and specialty medical clinics. Compared with veterans with mental disorders treated in specialty mental health clinics, those treated in medical clinics had less serious psychiatric diagnoses and made fewer visits. While there was a substantial shift of care from specialty to primary care during the study period, no comparable change in the distribution of care between medical and mental health settings was found. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns in VA clinics differ markedly from those in the private sector. Research is needed to determine whether and how staffing models developed in HMOs and community samples should be extended to these public-sector settings.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
10.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(8): 1274-8, 2000 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10910790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Employers are playing an increasingly influential role in determining the scope and character of health coverage in the United States. This study compares the health and disability costs of depressive illness with those of four other chronic conditions among employees of a large U.S. corporation. METHOD: Data from the health and employee files of 15,153 employees of a major U.S. corporation who filed health claims in 1995 were examined. Analyses compared the mental health costs, medical costs, sick days, and total health and disability costs associated with depression and four other conditions: heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, and back problems. Regression models were used to control for demographic differences and job characteristics. RESULTS: Employees treated for depression incurred annual per capita health and disability costs of $5,415, significantly more than the cost for hypertension and comparable to the cost for the three other medical conditions. Employees with depressive illness plus any of the other conditions cost 1.7 times more than those with the comparison medical conditions alone. Depressive illness was associated with a mean of 9.86 annual sick days, significantly more than any of the other conditions. Depressed employees under the age of 40 years took 3.5 more annual sick days than those 40 years old or older. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of depression to employers, particularly the cost in lost work days, is as great or greater than the cost of many other common medical illnesses, and the combination of depressive and other common illnesses is particularly costly. The strong association between depressive illness and sick days in younger workers suggests that the impact of depression may increase as these workers age.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Trastorno Depresivo/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/economía , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Femenino , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/economía , Humanos , Hipertensión/economía , Seguro por Discapacidad/economía , Seguro por Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 57(7): 708-14, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10891042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, this study provides the first national estimates for use of practitioner-based complementary treatments by US residents reporting mental conditions. METHODS: A total of 16038 respondents to the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were asked about visits for 12 complementary medical services (eg, chiropractic services and herbal remedies). Bivariate and multiple regression models examined use of these therapies in individuals reporting a mental condition (n= 1803), fair or poor mental health status (n=992), and 1 of 4 chronic medical conditions (n = 3262) and in the remainder of the sample (n= 10 793). RESULTS: A total of 9.8% of those reporting a mental condition made a complementary visit, and about half of these (4.5%) made a visit to treat the mental condition. Persons reporting transient stress or adjustment disorders were most likely (odds ratio, 9.1%; 95% confidence interval, 5.5%-12.7%), and those with psychotic (odds ratio, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-4.2%) and affective (odds ratio, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5%-3.8%) conditions least likely, to use complementary therapies to treat their mental condition. In multivariate models controlling for medical comorbidity, fair or poor mental health status, and demographic factors, report of a mental condition predicted a 1.27-fold increase in the odds of a complementary visit (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported mental conditions were associated with increased use of complementary treatments, although use of these treatments was concentrated in respondents with transient distress rather than chronic and serious conditions. More research using structured diagnostic interviews is needed to examine the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of use of these treatments by individuals with mental conditions in "real world" community settings.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adulto , Terapias Complementarias/economía , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Probabilidad , Análisis de Regresión , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 61(3): 234-7; quiz 238-9, 2000 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10817113

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have reported disturbingly low rates of treatment for major depression in the United States. To better understand this phenomenon, we studied the prevalence and predictors of antidepressant treatment in a national sample of individuals with major depression. METHOD: Between 1988 and 1994, 7589 individuals, aged 17-39 years and drawn from a national probability sample, were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interviewers asked about prescription drug use and checked medication bottles to record the name and type of medications. RESULTS: A total of 312 individuals, or 4.1% of the sample, met DSM-III criteria for current major depression. Only 7.4% of those with current major depression were being treated with an antidepressant. Among individuals with current major depression, being insured and having a primary care provider each predicted a 4-fold increase in odds of antidepressant treatment; telling the primary provider about depressive symptoms predicted a 10-fold increase in treatment. CONCLUSION: The study's findings support the notion that a serious gap exists between the established efficacy of antidepressant medications and rates of treatment for major depression in the "real world." Underreporting of depressive symptoms to providers and problems with access to general medical care appear to be 2 major contributors to this problem.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
JAMA ; 283(4): 506-11, 2000 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10659877

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: A number of studies have found race- and sex-based differences in rates of cardiovascular procedures in the United States. Similarly, mental disorders might be expected to be associated with lower rates of such procedures on the basis of clinical, socioeconomic, patient, and provider factors. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether having a comorbid mental disorder is associated with a lower likelihood of cardiac catheterization and/or revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files as part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. SETTING: Acute care nongovernmental hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: National cohort of 113653 eligible patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized for confirmed acute myocardial infarction between February 1994 and July 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the index hospitalization, comparing patients with and without mental disorders (classified as schizophrenia, major affective disorder, substance abuse/dependence disorder, or other mental disorder). RESULTS: Compared with the remainder of the sample, patients with any comorbid mental disorder (n = 5365; 4.7%) were significantly less likely to undergo PTCA (11.8% vs 16.8%; P<.001) or CABG (8.2% vs 12.6%; P<.001). After adjusting for demographic, clinical, hospital, and regional factors, individuals with mental disorders were 41% (for schizophrenia) to 78% (for substance use) as likely to undergo cardiac catheterization as those without mental disorders (P<.001 for all). Among those undergoing catheterization, rates of PTCA or CABG for patients with mental disorders were not significantly different from rates for patients without mental disorders (for those with any mental disorder, P = .12 for PTCA and P = .06 for CABG). In multivariate models, the 30-day mortality did not differ between patients with and without mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, individuals with comorbid mental disorders were substantially less likely to undergo coronary revascularization procedures than those without mental disorders. Further research is needed to understand the degree to which patient and provider factors contribute to this difference and its implications for quality and long-term outcomes of care.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
14.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 19(1): 203-9, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10645088

RESUMEN

This DataWatch uses data from the 1993 Employee Health Care Value Survey (EHCVS) to compare the experiences of respondents with and without chronic illnesses under managed care. After controlling for potential confounders, we found that chronic illness was associated with increased odds of dissatisfaction in both independent practice association plans and prepaid group practices, but not under fee-for-service coverage. Chronic illness appeared to exacerbate difficulties and to attenuate the benefits experienced by healthy persons under managed care. We conclude that persons with chronic illnesses may be at particular risk under managed care; their experiences may warrant particular attention when health plan performance is being monitored.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/normas , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , New England , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
16.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 60(10): 664-7, 1999 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10549682

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As admission criteria to inpatient units become more focused on patient safety and behavioral instability, primary treatment often requires use of medications that need to be quick, safe, and effective for control of agitation. This article reviews the evidence that droperidol may serve as the optimal medication for this task. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive MEDLINE search of English-language literature was conducted using the search term droperidol concerning the use of droperidol in psychiatric emergencies. Cross-referencing of those articles was conducted to include pertinent articles in the non-psychiatric and European literature regarding safety and early development of the drug. STUDY FINDINGS: As evidenced in the animal and clinical literature, studies demonstrate the efficacy and rapidity of onset of droperidol and its relative safety compared with the most widely used antiagitation drug, haloperidol. Evidence for this use of droperidol is particularly compelling for situations in which intramuscular administration is necessary. CONCLUSION: Droperidol, while not in widespread use, may prove to be the superior typical neuroleptic for psychiatric emergencies. Increased clinical utilization and study of droperidol for this use is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Conducta Peligrosa , Droperidol/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Agitación Psicomotora/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Animales , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Droperidol/administración & dosificación , Droperidol/efectos adversos , Servicios de Urgencia Psiquiátrica , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Haloperidol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Ratas
17.
JAMA ; 282(7): 651-6, 1999 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10517718

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The terms alternative and complementary medicine suggest 2 contradictory possibilities. Whether individuals use unconventional therapies as a substitute for or as an "add on" to conventional medical treatments is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between use of unconventional therapies and conventional medical care in a national sample. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was distributed to a probability sample of the noninstitutionalized civilian US population. Of 24676 individuals responding (77.7% response rate), 16068 adults 18 years or older were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visits to practitioners for unconventional therapies and conventional medical services, including number of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits and use of 8 types of preventive medical services (blood pressure, cholesterol level, physical examination, influenza vaccination, prostate examination, breast examination, mammography, and Papanicolaou test). RESULTS: During 1996, an estimated 6.5% of the US population had visits for both unconventional therapies and conventional medical care; 1.8% used only unconventional services; 59.5% used only conventional care; and 32.2% used neither. Compared with those with only conventional visits, those who used both types of care had significantly more outpatient physician visits (7.9 vs 5.4; P<.001), and used more of all types of preventive services except mammography. These groups did not differ significantly in inpatient care, prescription drug use, or number of emergency department visits. Individuals in the top quartile of number of physician visits were more than twice as likely as those in the bottom quartile to have used unconventional therapies in the past year (14.5% vs 6.4%; P<.001). The association between unconventional treatments and physician visits remained after adjusting for potential confounders and across different types of unconventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, use of unconventional therapies was substantially lower than has been reported in previous national surveys, but was associated with increased use of physician services. From a health services perspective, practitioner-based unconventional therapies appear to serve more as a complement than an alternative to conventional medicine.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Vigilancia de la Población , Medicina Preventiva/tendencias , Análisis de Regresión , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Psychiatr Serv ; 50(8): 1053-8, 1999 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10445654

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although measures of consumer satisfaction are increasingly used to supplement administrative measures in assessing quality of care, little is known about the association between these two types of indicators. This study examined the association between these measures at both an individual and a hospital level. METHODS: A satisfaction questionnaire was mailed to veterans discharged during a three-month period from 121 Veterans Administration inpatient psychiatric units; 5,542 responded, for a 37 percent response rate. These data were merged with data from administrative utilization files. Random regression analysis was used to determine the association between satisfaction and administrative measures of quality for subsequent outpatient follow-up. RESULTS: At the patient level, satisfaction with several aspects of service delivery was associated with fewer readmissions and fewer days readmitted. Better alliance with inpatient staff was associated with higher administrative measures of rates of follow-up, promptness of follow-up, and continuity of outpatient care, as well as with longer stay for the initial hospitalization. At the hospital level, only one association between satisfaction and administrative measures was statistically significant. Hospitals where patients expressed greater satisfaction with their alliance with outpatient staff had higher scores on administrative measures of promptness and continuity of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The associations between patient satisfaction and administrative measures of quality at the individual level support the idea that these measures address a common underlying construct. The attenuation of the associations at the hospital level suggests that neither type can stand alone as a measure of quality across institutions.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Cuidados Posteriores/normas , Relaciones Paciente-Hospital , Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Muestreo , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
Am J Psychiatry ; 156(3): 477-9, 1999 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10080569

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the association between depressive symptoms and health costs for a national Veterans Administration (VA) sample. METHOD: The Rand Depression Index was administered to 1,316 medical or surgical inpatients over the age of 60 at nine VA hospitals. Scores were merged with utilization, demographic, and hospital data from national VA inpatient and outpatient files. RESULTS: Medical costs for respondents with the highest quartile of symptoms were approximately $3,200-or 50%-greater than medical costs for those in the least symptomatic quartile. Depressive symptoms were not associated with any statistically significant mental health expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: The study extends previous reports of the high medical costs associated with depressive disorders to an older, public sector population. The mechanisms underlying increased medical costs associated with depressive symptoms, while the subject of much speculation in the literature, still remain largely unknown.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales de Veteranos/economía , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
20.
Psychiatr Serv ; 50(2): 214-8, 1999 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10030479

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The associations between self-reported depressive and substance use disorders and estimated health care costs were examined in a representative national sample. METHODS: Data were from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey (N=77,183). Respondents who reported depressive symptoms or major depression (depressive syndromes) or a substance abuse disorder in the past year were compared with respondents who did not report these conditions. The mean number of inpatient days and outpatient visits in both the general medical and the specialty mental health settings were determined, and costs per individual were calculated based on mean costs of such care in each respondent's geographic region. Multivariate models were constructed to calculate mean costs, controlling for demographic variables, insurance coverage, and physical health status. RESULTS: Individuals with self-reported depressive syndromes or substance abuse had mean health care costs that were $1,766 higher than costs for individuals without these conditions. Depressive syndromes were associated with increases in both inpatient and outpatient costs. However, substance abuse was almost exclusively associated with increased inpatient expenditures rather than outpatient costs. The magnitude of increased costs associated with mental disorders was substantially larger for patients in fee-for-service plans than for those in health maintenance organizations. Only 14.3 percent of visits made by individuals reporting depressive syndromes or substance abuse were made to specialty health providers (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers). CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs of people with self-reported mental illness varied significantly across diagnoses and systems of care. It is crucial that researchers estimating increased costs associated with mental illness account for both diagnostic and system factors that can influence the estimates.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/clasificación , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA