Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 204: 301-304.e2, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30314661

RESUMEN

Infants in the Australian and UK Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting-II trials treated using revised oximeters spent more time within their planned pulse oximeter saturation target ranges than infants treated using the original oximeters (P < .001). This may explain the larger mortality difference seen with revised oximeters. If so, average treatment effects from the Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-analysis trials may be underestimates.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Infantil , Oximetría/métodos , Oxígeno/sangre , Australia , Calibración , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Oximetría/instrumentación , Reino Unido
2.
J Pediatr ; 165(1): 30-35.e2, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24560181

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an oxygen saturation (Spo2) target of 85%-89% compared with 91%-95% reduced the incidence of the composite outcome of death or major disability at 2 years of age in infants born at <28 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A total 340 infants were randomized to a lower or higher target from <24 hours of age until 36 weeks' gestational age. Blinding was achieved by targeting a displayed Spo2 of 88%-92% using a saturation monitor offset by ±3% within the range 85%-95%. True saturations were displayed outside this range. Follow-up at 2 years' corrected age was by pediatric examination and formal neurodevelopmental assessment. Major disability was gross motor disability, cognitive or language delay, severe hearing loss, or blindness. RESULTS: The primary outcome was known for 335 infants with 33 using surrogate language information. Targeting a lower compared with a higher Spo2 target range had no significant effect on the rate of death or major disability at 2 years' corrected age (65/167 [38.9%] vs 76/168 [45.2%]; relative risk 1.15, 95% CI 0.90-1.47) or any secondary outcomes. Death occurred in 25 (14.7%) and 27 (15.9%) of those randomized to the lower and higher target, respectively, and blindness in 0% and 0.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no benefit or harm from targeting a lower compared with a higher saturation in this trial, further information will become available from the prospectively planned meta-analysis of this and 4 other trials comprising a total of nearly 5000 infants.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Prematuro/metabolismo , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso/metabolismo , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Oxígeno/sangre , Australia , Preescolar , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Prematuro/mortalidad , Enfermedades del Prematuro/terapia , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA