RESUMEN
AIM: To compare healing responses to periosteal sliding grafts and polyglactin 910 periodontal mesh used as guided tissue regeneration (GTR) materials/techniques when both periapical and periradicular bone loss are present. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients with suppurative chronic apical periodontitis with apicomarginal communication were selected and allocated randomly into two groups according to the barrier technique to be used during periradicular surgery: periosteal graft group (n = 15) and bioabsorbable membrane group (n = 15). Clinical and radiological evaluations were completed prior to surgery, a week later and every 3 months after surgery up to 12 months to measure the periodontal pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival margin position (GMP), size of periapical lesion, percentage reduction of the periapical rarefaction, and periapical healing. RESULTS: Both groups showed highly significant (P < 0.001) reductions in periodontal PD, CAL and size of periapical lesion at 12 months whilst GMP was unaltered. No significant difference between the experimental groups was evident for these parameters, or for the percentage reduction of size of the periapical lesion and clinical-radiographic healing. CONCLUSION: Guided tissue regeneration applied to apicomarginal defects using sliding periosteal grafts and use of bioabsorbable membranes led to similar enhancements of the clinical outcome of periradicular surgery in terms of periapical healing, gain of periodontal support, PD reduction and minimal recession of the gingival margin.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/cirugía , Defectos de Furcación/cirugía , Regeneración Tisular Guiada Periodontal/métodos , Implantes Absorbibles , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar/clasificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Defectos de Furcación/clasificación , Encía/patología , Recesión Gingival/clasificación , Humanos , Masculino , Membranas Artificiales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absceso Periapical/cirugía , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/clasificación , Pérdida de la Inserción Periodontal/cirugía , Bolsa Periodontal/clasificación , Bolsa Periodontal/cirugía , Periostio/trasplante , Poliglactina 910 , Estudios Prospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To describe the usefulness of periosteal grafts as barriers for bone regeneration in periradicular surgery when advanced periodontal breakdown occurs. SUMMARY: The treatment of advanced periodontal breakdown as a result of an associated endodontic lesion constitutes a multifaceted challenge to the clinician. If the source of the irritation cannot be removed by orthograde endodontic treatment, nonsurgical and surgical endodontic/periodontal intervention may be required. Two cases with suppurative chronic apical periodontitis with apicomarginal communication are described. Clinical and radiological evaluations were completed immediately prior to surgery, a week later and every 2 months after surgery for 10 months. Both patients were treated using split-thickness flaps and lateral displacement of the periosteum prior to suturing, in order to close the communication between the oral and the periapical surroundings. A remission of the clinical signs and symptoms, and successful healing in the short-term were achieved in these cases. KEY LEARNING POINTS: Periapical and periodontal lesions are closely related through pathways of communication. Disruption of the cortical plate and the presence of dentoalveolar sinus tracts can have a deleterious effect on the regeneration process after periradicular surgery. The adoption of supplementary periodontal surgical techniques may help to solve some of the difficulties in the healing process in periradicular surgery. Periosteal grafts have been shown to have the potential to stimulate bone formation when used as a graft material.