RESUMEN
Craniosynostosis in Apert syndrome is routinely treated by wide frontal and bilateral supraorbital reshaping and posterior cranial decompression. Dynamic cranial vault expansion has proved to be useful in craniofacial surgery, and its use has extended to syndromic patients. Although a controversy remains between conventional osteotomy and application of the spring-mediated technique in surgical treatment of craniosynostosis, there have been several positive clinical reports on expansion techniques for nonsyndromic and syndromic craniosynostosis. Simultaneous fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault expansion have been applied successfully to 2 patients of Apert syndrome, without intraoperative complications or postoperative morbidity and improving final cranial shape.
Asunto(s)
Acrocefalosindactilia/cirugía , Hueso Frontal/cirugía , Hueso Occipital/cirugía , Órbita/cirugía , Implantes Absorbibles , Placas Óseas , Hilos Ortopédicos , Suturas Craneales/cirugía , Craneotomía/instrumentación , Craneotomía/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Hueso Parietal/cirugíaRESUMEN
A patient having adequate records and diagnosed as having Binder syndrome is presented. Nasomaxillary hypoplasia requires a definitive treatment, use of bone grafts, upper maxillary osteotomies, and advancement or a combination of both. Bone grafts can be reabsorbed, and complete maxillary advance modifies normal occlusion in a certain way, because the posterior sector is not compromised. The aim of this case treatment is to create a new osseous surface that makes the eruption of the permanent dental pieces easier and gives the correct skeletal position to the upper maxilla with distraction osteogenesis combined with an orthopedic appliance, transmaxillary segment osteotomy, and subsequent orthodontics. The absence of the osseous surface in the upper maxilla and the presence of supernumeraries in the anterior region determined the permanence of most of the temporary dental pieces, resulting in the impossibility of making the exchange to permanent dental pieces. The technique and the devices are simple and easy to manipulate. After the treatment, an adequate dental relation is restored as well as effective advance of the upper maxillary bone; thus, an excellent functional and stable esthetic result is achieved, avoiding any complication of velopharingeal incompetence.
Asunto(s)
Maxilar/anomalías , Maxilar/cirugía , Anomalías Maxilofaciales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/métodos , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Maloclusión/complicaciones , Maloclusión/terapia , Hueso Nasal/anomalías , Hueso Nasal/cirugía , Ortodoncia Correctiva , Síndrome , Diente Supernumerario/complicaciones , Diente Supernumerario/cirugíaRESUMEN
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis in children disturbs not only mandibular growth, but also facial skeletal development. Costochondral graft was used to ensure growth, but it had proven to be unpredictable. The authors evaluate retrospectively 41 patients who underwent temporomandibular joint reconstruction during the last 10 years. Twenty were treated by costochondral graft, 15 by arthroplasty, and 6 by other surgical procedures, and they were excluded. The etiology was septic in 54% of the cases. Follow-up was at least 12 months in all cases. Arthroplasty was a quicker and easier procedure than the costochondral graft, reducing operating time, risk of blood transfusion, and hospital stays and costs. It also was associated with less risk of reankylosis, 13%vs 25%. Furthermore, it was associated with a minor morbidity and secondary complications. Seventy-five percent of the patients treated with bone graft required additional secondary surgery. Radiographically, the authors observed a remodeled neocondyle at the level of proximal mandibular end in cases treated by arthroplasty. On clinical examination, patients showed variable degrees of facial deformity and an unknown potential of mandibular growth after TMJ arthroplasty. The authors also observed improved clinical and radiologic appearance after ankylosis correction. Is it reasonable to perform ankylosis release and mandibular distraction simultaneously without knowing which patients will be able to experience growth with time? In that case it would be necessary a predict growth to apply the exact amount of mandibular distraction for obtaining stable results. Timing of mandibular distraction, after TMJ arthroplasty is performed and mandibular function restored, must be specific to each patient's needs, assuring the best distraction conditions and planning. The authors present their treatment protocol, including TMJ joint arthroplasty with temporal muscle interposition, and mandibular distraction osteogenesis, as a second procedure, to correct residual asymmetry or retrognathism if necessary.