RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To compare the risks, implications, and outcomes of transvenous semipermanent pacing as a bridge to permanent system implantation or recovery. METHODS: We investigated semipermanent transvenous pacing systems consisting of one (n = 57%) or two (n = 3%) bipolar active-fixation pacing leads and an attached epicutaneous pulse generator implanted from 2000 to 2009. The study population comprised 60 patients aged 72.9 ± 10.5 years (44 [73.3%] male). Forty-two (70%) were enrolled for complete system explantation for cardiac-implanted electronic devices associated infection. Eighteen (30%) required temporary pacing in the context of a variety of mostly severe cardiac and noncardiac conditions. The semipermanent pacing systems were removed after implantation of permanent systems or recovery of a noncompromising heart rhythm, respectively. RESULTS: Transvenous semipermanent lead implantation was successful in 59 (98.3%) patients. Major and minor intraoperative complications occurred in one case (1.7%) each. The semipermanent systems were left in situ for a mean period of 14.6 ± 8.1 days). They served as a bridge to permanent system implantation in 68.3% (n = 41) and as a bridge to recovery of a noncompromising heart rhythm in 11.7% (n = 7). Four patients (8.3%) died with the semipermanent pacing system in situ, and seven (11.7%) were transferred to external hospitals with semipermanent pacing systems. CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous semipermanent pacing with bipolar active-fixation leads and epicutaneous pulse generators provide an important option for prolonged temporary pacing as a bridge to permanent system implantation or recovery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing application of cardiac resynchronization therapy is accompanied by an increase in patients requiring removal of coronary sinus (CS) leads. The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of closed chest CS lead extraction using intravascular dissection devices. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2011, 41 patients (80.5% men; aged 64.2±13.8 years) underwent transvenous CS lead extraction procedures. Reasons for lead extraction were infection in 9, CS lead dislodgement in 15, lead malfunction, including manufacturer-initiated product recall in 6, phrenic nerve stimulation in 5, combinations of causes in 5, and elective extraction concomitant with generator replacement for battery depletion in 1. RESULTS: In addition to 24 isolated CS lead extractions, we performed 17 multiple lead extractions (2 to 4 leads) after a mean of 30.6±32.5 months. The time elapsed from implantation was 4.6±9.1 months for isolated CS and 42.6±32.4 months for multiple lead extractions. Extraction by direct manual traction was feasible in 13 patients by locking stylets in 6. Escalation to mechanical sheaths was required in 17 patients and to electrosurgical sheaths in 5. More aggressive methods were associated with longer implantation times and positive infection status. No deaths or major periprocedural complications occurred. Six minor postprocedural complications, of which three were surgically related, occurred in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Closed chest CS lead extraction can be safely performed with excellent results. We recommend an escalating approach from isolated manual traction over locking stylets to mechanical sheaths and, eventually, electrosurgical dissection devices. The application in mainly high-risk patients demands an interdisciplinary approach to enhance safety and limit morbidity and death.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CD endocarditis is a potentially lethal complication after implantation of permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Complete extraction of the hardware along with antibiotic treatment is the standard therapy. However, there is no standard procedure in the treatment of lead-associated infective endocarditis with large thrombotic vegetations. The authors present the case of a 60-year-old patient with a large vegetation located on the right atrial lead. Due to a high surgical and thrombembolic risk, especially of acute massive pulmonary embolism, the patient received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to dissolve the thrombus under echocardiographic monitoring. The thrombotic masses were substantially reduced after thrombolysis. Therefore, standard transvenous extraction of the leads could be performed and high risk cardiac re-operation could be avoided.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Unintended internal suturing of central venous lines or pulmonary artery catheters in the superior caval vein or the right atrium following cardiac surgery remains a rare but troublesome complication. The line is normally entangled in safety or hemostasis sutures after the removal of the superior caval cannulation. If mild tension is unsuccessful, the patient normally undergoes resternotomy. The objective of this brief communication is to describe of a simple and safe removal method using a transvenous rotational cutting device to divide the hemostasis suture. In order to avoid complicating bleeding, a time delay between initial placement and removal is highly recommended. For extraction, a fully equipped cardiovascular operating room with central venous and arterial lines, attached defibrillator pads, transesophageal echo monitoring, fluoroscopy, and a surgical team, including a heart and lung machine and a perfusionist standby, is mandatory.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)