RESUMEN
Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are conjugating enzymes involved in drug metabolism, antioxidant defence, and cell signalling. Herein, we investigated hepatic GST conjugation in several mouse and rat strains, including both sexes, with a direct comparison to humans.Using general and isoform-selective substrates, all mouse strains had significantly greater activities than humans for total cytosolic GST, GST-M, GST-T, and microsomal GST activities. Some strains had significantly greater GST-P activities compared to humans. Sex differences between males and females were evident in all strains for total cytosolic GST, GST-M, and GST-P, and sex differences in GST-T and microsomal GST activities within strains were noted.All rats had significantly greater activities than humans for GST-M and GST-T; only some strains were significantly greater than humans for GST-P, total cytosolic GST, and microsomal GST. Sex differences within strains showed significantly greater GST-M and GST-T activities in males compared to females. Select strains showed sex differences for total cytosolic and microsomal GST activities; there were no sex differences in GST-P activities.Significant differences in glutathione conjugation between humans and rodents exist, including sex differences. This highlights the need for careful animal selection in pre-clinical studies where GSTs are the primary metabolic pathway.
Asunto(s)
Glutatión Transferasa , Roedores , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Ratas , Ratones , Animales , Roedores/metabolismo , Especificidad de la Especie , Glutatión Transferasa/metabolismo , Hígado/metabolismo , GlutatiónRESUMEN
Mathematical models that can predict the kinetics of compounds have been increasingly adopted for drug development and risk assessment. Data for these models may be generated from in vitro experimental systems containing enzymes contributing to metabolic clearance, such as subcellular tissue fractions including microsomes and cytosol. Extrapolation from these systems is facilitated by common scaling factors, known as microsomal protein per gram (MPPG) and cytosolic protein per gram (CPPG). Historically, parameterization of MPPG and CPPG has employed the use of recovery factors, commonly benchmarked to cytochromes P450 which work well in some contexts, but could be problematic for other enzymes. Here, we propose absolute quantification of protein content and supplementary assays to evaluate microsomal/cytosolic purity that should be employed. Examples include calculation of microsomal latency by mannose-6-phosphatase activity and immunoblotting of subcellular fractions with fraction-specific markers. Further considerations include tissue source, as disease states can affect enzyme expression and activity, and the methodology used for scalar parameterization. Regional- and organ-specific expression of enzymes, in addition to differences in organ physiology, is another important consideration. Because most efforts have focused on the liver that is, for the most part, homogeneous, derived scalars may not capture the heterogeneity of other major tissues contributing to xenobiotic metabolism including the kidneys and small intestine. Better understanding of these scalars, and how to appropriately derive them from extrahepatic tissues can provide support to the inferences made with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, increase its accuracy in characterizing in vivo drug pharmacokinetics, and improve confidence in go-no-go decisions for clinical trials.