RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, psychomotor deficits are currently assessed by means of observation scales. However, instrumental (including mechanical and electronic) measurement techniques might also be valuable in clinical practice. AIM: To discuss the added value of using instrumental registration of psychomotor functioning into clinical practice. METHOD: We investigated the main pros and cons of instrumental registration by searching the literature systematically and we discuss our findings using concrete examples. RESULTS: Compared to observation scales, instrumental registration yields more reliable and sensitive information about the psychomotor functioning of patients. Another advantage of instrumental registration is that it gives us an opportunity to study affected sub-processes and underlying mechanisms. However, the validity of these measurements depends on whether instrumental registration can adequately reflect aspects of a movement that can be observed clinically. CONCLUSION: Clinical practice could benefit substantially from using instrumental registration of psychomotor disturbances in schizophrenia. However, more time and money needs to be invested in research before the new technique is fully validated and ready for use in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Examen Neurológico/métodos , Trastornos Psicomotores/diagnóstico , Humanos , Examen Neurológico/instrumentación , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Desempeño Psicomotor , Esquizofrenia/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Catatonia, extrapyramidal signs, psychomotor slowing, and (motoric) neurological soft signs are well-known psychomotor symptoms in schizophrenia. This study aims at investigating the interrelations between these symptoms. In addition, associations between psychomotor symptoms, clinical symptoms, and cognitive functioning will be studied. METHOD: An extensive test battery containing psychomotor (Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale; St Hans Rating Scale; Salpêtrière Retardation Rating Scale; Neurological Evaluation Scale) and clinical (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; Calgary Depression Scale) rating scales as well as instrumental psychomotor tests (Line Copying Task; Finger Tapping Task) and cognitive tasks (Symbol Digit Substitution Test; Stroop Colour Word Test; Continuous Performance Test; Letter Number Sequencing) was administered to a sample of 124 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. RESULTS: Correlational analyses showed that two clusters emerge from our data: first, a psychomotor poverty cluster referring to the interrelations between catatonia, parkinsonism, psychomotor slowing, and negative symptoms; second, a cluster containing motoric neurological soft signs, which were found to be correlated with cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION: Psychomotor abnormalities are highly prevalent phenomena in schizophrenia that have to be considered as a heterogeneous construct. However, longitudinal and neurobiological research is needed to further explore the precise nature of the interrelations found in this study.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicomotores/fisiopatología , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/etiología , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/fisiopatología , Catatonia/epidemiología , Catatonia/etiología , Catatonia/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Examen Neurológico , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/epidemiología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/etiología , Trastornos Parkinsonianos/fisiopatología , Prevalencia , Trastornos Psicomotores/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicomotores/etiología , Desempeño Psicomotor , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For more than two decades psychiatrists have known about and have promoted modafinil, a very promising stimulant that boosts wakefulness in cases of narcolepsy and also enhances cognitive functions. At present, however, we must conclude that modafinil is hardly ever used to treat illness other than narcolepsy. AIM: To review current attitudes and practice with regard to the use and efficacy of modafinil in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Relevant placebo-controlled studies were retrieved via PubMed (Medline) and Web of Science. RESULTS: Modafinil is used experimentally to treat ADHD, mood disorders, schizophrenia and substance-dependence. Compared to placebo, modafinil achieves positive but mainly variable results on different clinical and cognitive measures. It achieves results very rapidly, within a week, but over a period of time the results stabilise. CONCLUSION: Modafinil is particularly successful in the treatment of ADHD, depression and cocaine-dependency on measures of attention and hyperactivity, fatigue and cocaine-use respectively. There is a need for further placebo-controlled trials with longer follow-up periods and larger sample size in order to ensure the safety of the product and to refine its area of efficacy.