RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The initial data of the International Study on Acute Coronary Syndromes - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 showed in Europe a remarkable reduction in primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and higher in-hospital mortality during the initial phase of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. The aim of the current study was to provide the final results of the registry, subsequently extended outside Europe with a larger inclusion period (up to June 2020) and longer follow-up (up to 30 days). METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre registry in 109 high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centres from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia and North Africa, enrolling 16 674 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPPCI in March/June 2019 and 2020. The main study outcomes were the incidence of PPCI, delayed treatment (ischaemia time >12 hours and door-to-balloon >30 min), in-hospital and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared with 2019 (incidence rate ratio 0.843, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.861, p<0.0001). This reduction was significantly associated with age, being higher in older adults (>75 years) (p=0.015), and was not related to the peak of cases or deaths due to COVID-19. The heterogeneity among centres was high (p<0.001). Furthermore, the pandemic was associated with a significant increase in door-to-balloon time (40 (25-70) min vs 40 (25-64) min, p=0.01) and total ischaemia time (225 (135-410) min vs 196 (120-355) min, p<0.001), which may have contributed to the higher in-hospital (6.5% vs 5.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day (8% vs 6.5%, p=0.001) mortality observed during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous revascularisation for STEMI was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, especially among older patients (about 20%), and longer delays to treatment, which may have contributed to the increased in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04412655.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiólogos/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) are high risk procedures with low success rates compared to standard PCI. Recently the 'hybrid approach' method has been developed to increase success rate. In 2015 we set up a dedicated program to systematically treat CTOs by this hybrid approach. This retrospective, observational registry aims to report achieved results in a single PCI centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed all CTO procedures between January 2012 and December 2017. Procedures performed by dedicated operators after December 2014 were assigned to the hybrid cohort, procedures done before this time or performed by a non-CTO operator were assigned to the non-hybrid cohort. Procedural techniques, difficulty of lesions, J-CTO scores, outcomes and complications were analysed. In total 505 procedures were included. Average J-CTO score was 1.9 ± 1.1, which was significantly higher in the hybrid cohort (2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1; p < 0.001). Overall procedural success rate was 75.4% with significantly higher success rates in the hybrid cohort (81.2% vs. 68.2%; p < 0.001). Combining both cohorts, overall success rate increased over the years (2012-2017 respectively 65.2%, 60.0%, 71.7%, 83.2%, 77.9% and 81.4%). Complication rate was higher in the hybrid cohort compared to the non-hybrid cohort (4.6% vs 0.4%, respectively; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: By introducing a systematic CTO program, including use of the hybrid approach, we observed higher success rates of PCI CTO, despite increased complexity of the lesions (higher J-CTO score). The occurrence of MACE was in accordance with current literature. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Our registry demonstrates that introduction of a dedicated CTO program increases success rates of CTO treatments despites increased lesions difficulty and with acceptable MACEs rates.