Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 29(2): e79-e84, 2021 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33394614

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hospital reimbursements for geriatric hip fractures are contingent on patient outcomes and hospital length of stay (LOS). This study examined if the day of the week (DOTW) and time of day (TOD) of both admission and surgery are associated with increased LOS. METHODS: LOS, time from admission to surgery, DOTW of admission/surgery, TOD of admission/surgery, and demographics were retrospectively collected. The average LOS was 4.5 days. Patients were grouped into cohorts of LOS 1 to 4 days (short-stay) and 5 to 12 days (long-stay). The percentage of short-stay patients was compared with the percentage of long-stay patients for each DOTW/TOD of admission/surgery with chi square tests. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included, 58 short stays and 42 long stays. Both groups were similar regarding demographics. Long-stay patients were 4.2 times more likely to have been admitted ([95% confidence interval 1.2 to 14.6], P = 0.02) and 4.8 times as likely to have undergone surgery ([95% confidence interval 1.0 to 5.6], P = 0.01) on a Thursday, respectively. TOD of admission/surgery did not demonstrate any association with LOS. DISCUSSION: Thursday admission/surgery was associated with longer LOS. Delayed surgical optimization coupled with insurance companies' observance of regular business hours may delay admission to inpatient rehab or skilled nursing facilities, resulting in avoidable healthcare expenditures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Anciano , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Hospitales , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440622

RESUMEN

No formal didactic source exists concerning terminology for movement of the C-arm in the operating room (OR). Many terminologies exist, breeding confusion among OR staff. The objective of this study was to survey the existing C-arm movement terminologies among orthopaedic surgeons and radiologic technologists and propose a standardized nomenclature moving forward. Methods: Forty-six orthopaedic surgeons and 70 radiologic technologists were surveyed. Pertinent product manuals and literature from PubMed were reviewed to find existing terms for the C-arm movement. A focus group of orthopaedic surgeons and radiologic technologists was formed and a standardized nomenclature of the C-arm terminology was developed using the Delphi method. Results: The survey response rate was 71%. The mean percentage of agreement on terms to describe movement was 47% (range, 13% to 83%). Agreement on terms to describe direction was 46% (range, 23% to 73%), and multiple frames of reference were described. No consensus was found by searching the product manuals. Using the Delphi method, we arrived at a standardized nomenclature for the C-arm movement that is reproducible and familiar. Discussion: A standardized terminology for the C-arm movement is described that will help fill a void in OR communication, combat confusion, and provide reproducible results during orthopaedic cases.


Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía/instrumentación , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Auxiliares de Cirugía , Quirófanos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Terminología como Asunto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA