Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 954: 176354, 2024 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39304165

RESUMEN

Photosensitization reactions caused by ultraviolet and visible radiation (UV-vis) absorbing chemicals can induce DNA damage through direct and indirect mechanisms. In this context, the investigation of phototoxicity is an essential part of the toxicological assessment programs for drugs, cosmetics and other chemicals that may be exposed to UV-vis light. The current battery of photosafety assessment tests includes an initial investigation of their photoreactive potential followed by in vitro phototoxicity testing. The in vitro 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) and the Reconstructed Human Epidermis phototoxicity methods are currently the only validated and recognized tests for this purpose. However, they are not suitable for detecting the photogenotoxic potential of compounds, as they are based on photocytotoxicity measurement. Although there are adaptations of genotoxicity assays in the presence of UV-vis irradiation, these methods are not validated and standardized, and their biomodels have limitations. Additionally, even though computational toxicology is an already implemented strategy for human health hazard assessment, in silico photosafety models also have limitations. The currently available in silico models are based on the 3T3 NRU assay, thus limiting their ability to reliably predict photogenotoxicity. There is evidence of chemicals that present negative results in 3T3 NRU-based in vitro and in silico tests, yet exhibit photogenotoxic potential. This is exemplified by the agrochemical glyphosate, whose photomutagenic effect was recently reported using a promising yeast-based method as a New Approach Methodology. Therefore, the need to implement a battery of phototoxicity tests, including in vitro and/or in silico photogenotoxicity assessments, to complement the existing photocytotoxicity tests should be re-discussed. Otherwise, photosafety is not completely guaranteed.

2.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 50(8): 707-723, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33064037

RESUMEN

Although sunlight provides several benefits, ultraviolet (UV) radiation plays an important role in the development of various skin damages such as erythema, photoaging, and photocarcinogenesis. Despite cells having endogenous defense systems, damaged DNA may not be efficiently repaired at chronic exposure. In this sense, it is necessary to use artificial defense strategies such as sunscreen formulations. UV filters should scatter, reflect, or absorb solar UV radiation in order to prevent direct or indirect DNA lesions. However, the safety of UV filters is a matter of concern due to several controversies reported in literature, such as endocrine alterations, allergies, increased oxidative stress, phototoxic events, among others. Despite these controversies, the way in which sunscreens are tested is essential to ensure safety. Sunscreen regulation includes mandatory test for phototoxicity, but photogenotoxicity testing is not recommended as a part of the standard photosafety testing program. Although available photobiological tests are still the first approach to assess photosafety, they are limited. Some existing tests do not always provide reliable results, mainly due to limitations regarding the nature of the assessed phototoxic effect, cell UV sensitivity, and the irradiation protocols. These aspects bring queries regarding the safety of sunscreen wide use and suggest the demand for the development of robust and efficient in vitro screening tests to overcome the existing limitations. In this way, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has stood out as a promising model to fill the gaps in photobiology and to complete the mandatory tests enabling a more extensive and robust photosafety assessment.


Asunto(s)
Protectores Solares/toxicidad , Daño del ADN , Humanos , Estrés Oxidativo , Piel , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Luz Solar , Rayos Ultravioleta
3.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 198: 111584, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31434036

RESUMEN

Although several short-term assays are available for cosmetic photosafety assessment, cell models are usually highly sensitive to UV radiation, tending to overestimate both phototoxic and photomutagenic risks. In addition, these assays are performed with UV doses/fluences that do not correspond to actual environmental conditions. In this sense, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has already proved to be an interesting tool to predict photomutagenic potential of several compounds, including sunscreens. Yeast can support environmental UVB doses compatible with human daily sunlight exposure, allowing the use of irradiation sources to faithfully mimic the external conditions of ambient sunlight. Herein, we used a set of S. cerevisiae mutant strains sensitive to UVA, UVB and Solar Simulated Light sources in order to evaluate their potential as bioindicators for sunscreen development. The bioindicator potential of the strains was tested with the widely-used titanium dioxide inorganic sunscreen. The AWP001 (yno1) and LPW002 (ogg1yno1) strains obtained in this study stood out as promising experimental tools for the validation of this assay. Overall, our results evidenced a set of S. cerevisiae strains particularly useful for evaluating both photoprotective (efficacy) and photo/antiphotomutagenic (safety) potential of UV filters, meeting the industries and regulatory agencies demand for robust and efficient in vitro screening tests.


Asunto(s)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae/efectos de los fármacos , Protectores Solares/química , Titanio/química , Rayos Ultravioleta , Pruebas de Mutagenicidad , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/efectos de la radiación , Luz Solar , Protectores Solares/farmacología , Titanio/farmacología
4.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 193: 162-171, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30884286

RESUMEN

Olive leaves contain higher amount of polyphenols than olive oil and represent a waste product from olive harvest and pruning of olive trees. The most abundant compound in olive leaves is oleuropein. Benefits of the topical application of olive leaves extract were previously reported, but little information is available on its photoprotective potential and the result of the association of this extract with organic UV filters in topical sunscreen formulations. The olive leaves extract photoprotective potential is less explored for both oral and topical photoprotection in comparison with other plants extracts and polyphenols, such as Polypodium leucotomos extract and resveratrol. There are increasing efforts towards developing more efficient sunscreens and a photoprotection assessement along with a better understanding of the photochemistry of naturally occurring sunscreens could aid the design of new and improved commercial sunscreen formulations. This study was designed to investigate the photoprotective potential of olive leaves extract standardized for oleuropein performing a set of in vitro and in silico tools as an innovative approach, highlighting yeast assays, in vitro Sun Protection Factor (SPF) and molecular modelling studies of UV absorption. This study supports the use of olive leaves extract for photoprotection, as an effective photoprotective, anti-mutagenic and antioxidant active, also showing a synergistic effect in association with UV filters with an improvement on in vitro SPF of sunscreen formulations.


Asunto(s)
Iridoides/química , Olea/química , Extractos Vegetales/química , Protectores Solares/química , Antioxidantes/química , Glucósidos Iridoides , Iridoides/aislamiento & purificación , Modelos Moleculares , Olea/metabolismo , Hojas de la Planta/química , Hojas de la Planta/metabolismo , Teoría Cuántica , Factor de Protección Solar , Protectores Solares/aislamiento & purificación , Rayos Ultravioleta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA