RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopaedic and trauma surgery training in Europe by conducting an online survey among orthopaedic trainees. METHODS: The survey was conducted among members of the Federation of Orthopaedic and Trauma Trainees in Europe (FORTE). It consisted of 24 questions (single-answer, multiple-answer, Likert scales). Orthopaedic trainees' demographic data (six questions), clinical role changes (four questions), institutional changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic (nine questions), and personal considerations (five questions) were examined. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-seven trainees from 23 European countries completed the survey. Most trainees retained their customary clinical role (59.8%), but a significant number was redeployed to COVID-19 units (20.9%). A drastic workload decrease during the pandemic was reported at most institutions. Only essential activities were performed at 57.1% of institutions and drastic disruptions were reported at 36.0%. Of the respondents, 52.1% stated that faculty-led education was restricted and 46.3% pursued self-guided learning, while 58.6% stated that surgical training was significantly impaired. Concerns about the achievement of annual training goals were expressed by 58.2% of the participants, while 25.0% anticipated the need for an additional year of training. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly affected orthopaedic and trauma training in Europe. Most trainees felt the decrease in clinical, surgical, and educational activities would have a detrimental effect on their training. Many of them consulted remote learning options to compensate training impairment, stating that after the COVID-19 pandemic electronic educational approaches may become more relevant in future.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Competencia Clínica/normas , Internado y Residencia/normas , Ortopedia/educación , Pandemias , Traumatología/educación , Adulto , Educación a Distancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Ortopedia/normas , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatología/normas , Traumatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/normas , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An acute ankle sprain can result in a bony avulsion of the lateral ankle ligaments. The extent of concomitant lesions and subsequent instability patterns are not clearly understood. The high incidence of old avulsion fractures found in symptomatic chronic ankle instability may indicate the need for primary fixation. METHODS: Ten patients (5 male, 5 female; mean age, 34 years; range, 15-64 years) with bony avulsion fractures of the fibula after acute ankle sprains were included. All patients were treated after a mean of 7.7 days (range, 2-17 days) with screw fixation of the fragment to the fibula. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed, and the extent of ligament injury was documented. RESULTS: The anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament were found to be attached to the avulsion fragment. The average size was 6.3 mm (range, 4-9 mm) in width from anterior to posterior and 5.2 mm (range, 4-7 mm) in length from superior to inferior. The displacement of the fragment increased under varus stress. Two patients had cartilage lesions in the lateral talus. After a mean follow-up period of 2.4 years (range, 2-4 years), all were clinically and radiographically stable, and patients were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed arthroscopically that the anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament were attached to the fragment. This is critical because motion between the fragment and the fibula may prevent spontaneous healing. Primary fixation of the fragment prevented rotational instability and was efficient to restore function and stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.