RESUMEN

The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques into the medical space has revolutionised tissue engineering. Depending upon the tissue type, specific AM approaches are capable of closely matching the physical and biological tissue attributes, to guide tissue regeneration. For hard tissue such as bone, powder bed fusion (PBF) techniques have significant potential, as they are capable of fabricating materials that can match the mechanical requirements necessary to maintain bone functionality and support regeneration. This review focuses on the PBF techniques that utilize laser sintering for creating scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. Optimal scaffold requirements are explained, ranging from material biocompatibility and bioactivity, to generating specific architectures to recapitulate the porosity, interconnectivity, and mechanical properties of native human bone. The main objective of the review is to outline the most common materials processed using PBF in the context of BTE; initially outlining the most common polymers, including polyamide, polycaprolactone, polyethylene, and polyetheretherketone. Subsequent sections investigate the use of metals and ceramics in similar systems for BTE applications. The last section explores how composite materials can be used. Within each material section, the benefits and shortcomings are outlined, including their mechanical and biological performance, as well as associated printing parameters. The framework provided can be applied to the development of new, novel materials or laser-based approaches to ultimately generate bone tissue analogues or for guiding bone regeneration.

RESUMEN

An array of biological properties is demonstrated in the category of extracts broadly known as ulvans, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant activities. However, the development of this category in biomedical applications is limited due to high structural variability across species and a lack of consistent and scalable sources. In addition, the modification and formulation of these molecules is still in its infancy with regard to progressing to product development. Here, a sulfated and rhamnose-rich, xylorhamno-uronic acid (XRU) extract from the cell wall of a controlled source of cultivated Australian ulvacean macroalgae resembles mammalian connective glycosaminoglycans. It is therefore a strong candidate for applications in wound healing and tissue regeneration. This study targets the development of polysaccharide modification for fabrication of 3D scaffolds for skin cell (fibroblast) culture. The XRU extract is methacrylated and UV-crosslinked to produce hydrogels with tuneable mechanical properties. The hydrogels demonstrate high cell viability and support cell proliferation over 14 days, which are far more functional than comparable alginate gels. Importantly, an XRU-based bioink is developed for extrusion printing 3D constructs both with and without cell encapsulation. These results highlight the close to product potential of this rhamnose-rich XRU extract as a promising biomaterial toward wound healing. Future studies should be focused on in-depth in vitro characterizations to examine the role of the material in dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion of 3D printed structures, and in vivo characterizations to assess its capacity in supporting wound healing.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Significance: Skin tissue damage is a major challenge and a burden on healthcare systems, from burns and other trauma to diabetes and vascular disease. Although the biological complexities are relatively well understood, appropriate repair mechanisms are scarce. Three-dimensional bioprinting is a layer-based approach to regenerative medicine, whereby cells and cell-based materials can be dispensed in fine spatial arrangements to mimic native tissue. Recent Advances: Various bioprinting techniques have been employed in wound repair-based skin tissue engineering, from laser-induced forward transfer to extrusion-based methods, and with the investigation of the benefits and shortcomings of each, with emphasis on biological compatibility and cell proliferation, migration, and vitality. Critical issues: Development of appropriate biological inks and the vascularization of newly developed tissues remain a challenge within the field of skin tissue engineering. Future Directions: Progress within bioprinting requires close interactions between material scientists, tissue engineers, and clinicians. Microvascularization, integration of multiple cell types, and skin appendages will be essential for creation of complex skin tissue constructs.