RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The neurobiology of persistent pain shares common underlying psychobiology with that of traumatic stress. Modern treatments for traumatic stress often involve bottom-up sensorimotor retraining/exposure therapies, where breath, movement, balance and mindfulness, are used to target underlying psychobiology. Vigorous exercise, in particular Bikram yoga, combines many of these sensorimotor/exposure therapeutic features. However, there is very little research investigating the feasibility and efficacy of such treatments for targeting the underlying psychobiology of persistent pain. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trail (RCT) comparing the efficacy of Bikram yoga versus high intensity interval training (HIIT), for improving persistent pain in women aged 20 to 50 years. The participants were 1:1 randomized to attend their assigned intervention, 3 times per week, for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and further pain related biopsychosocial secondary outcomes, including SF-36 Medical Outcomes and heart rate variability (HRV), were also explored. Data was collected pre (t0) and post (t1) intervention via an online questionnaire and physiological testing. RESULTS: A total of 34 women were recruited from the community. Analyses using ANCOVA demonstrated no significant difference in BPI (severity plus interference) scores between the Bikram yoga (n = 17) and the HIIT (n = 15). Women in the Bikram yoga group demonstrated significantly improved SF-36 subscale physical functioning: [ANCOVA: F(1, 29) = 6.17, p = .019, partial eta-squared effect size (ηp2) = .175 and mental health: F(1, 29) = 9.09, p = .005, ηp2 = .239; and increased heart rate variability (SDNN): F(1, 29) = 5.12, p = .013, ηp2 = .150, scores compared to the HIIT group. Across both groups, pain was shown to decrease, no injuries were experienced and retention rates were 94% for Bikram yoga and 75% for HIIT . CONCLUSIONS: Bikram yoga does not appear a superior exercise compared to HIIT for persistent pain. However, imporvements in quality of life measures and indicator of better health were seen in the Bikram yoga group. The outcomes of the present study suggest vigorous exercise interventions in persistent pain cohorts are feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12617001507370 , 26/10/2017).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This review provides an outline of the association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Much is known about the two individual clinical conditions; however, it is not until recently, biological mechanisms have been uncovered that link both MDD and CHD. The activation of stress pathways have been implicated as a neurochemical mechanism that links MDD and CHD. Depression is known to be associated with poorer outcomes of CHD. Psychological factors, such as major depression and stress, are now known as risk factors for developing CHD, which is as important and is independent of classic risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cigarette smoking. Both conditions have great socioeconomic importance given that depression and CHD are likely to be two of the three leading causes of global burden of disease. Better understanding of the common causal pathways will help us delineate more appropriate treatments.

RESUMEN

AIM: To examine the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on blood pressure (BP) and health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with resistant hypertension, pseudoresistant hypertension due to a white-coat effect and in patients with uncontrolled masked hypertension. METHODS: Using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Spielberger's state and trait anxiety questionnaires, we examined QoL, symptoms of depression and anxiety prior to and 12 months following RDN. BP was assessed from clinic and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) recordings. RESULTS: Patients with uncontrolled masked hypertension had the highest BDI and anxiety scores among all groups at baseline. Twelve months following RDN clinic and ambulatory BP were reduced only in those patients with resistant hypertension (delta SBP: clinic -16 ±â€Š3 mmHg, ABPMday -8 ±â€Š2 mmHg, ABPMnight -8 ±â€Š2 mmHg, all P < 0.01). Clinic BP was reduced in the pseudoresistant group (-17 ±â€Š6 mmHg, P < 0.01) but was elevated in the uncontrolled masked group (+13 ±â€Š6 mmHg, P = 0.02). In all patients, trait anxiety (P < 0.05), BDI scores (P < 0.05) and the SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) score (P < 0.001) were improved. The improvement in the SF-36 MCS was confined to those patients with resistant hypertension (+4.0 ±â€Š1.1, P < 0.01). The change in clinic BP after RDN was related to the baseline clinic BP (systolic: r = 0.54, P < 0.001; diastolic r = 0.43, P < 0.001), the number of ablations delivered (both clinic and mean day ABPM systolic r = 0.24, P < 0.05) and to the change in SF-36 MCS score (systolic: r = 0.25, P = 0.01; diastolic r = 0.24, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that in patients with confirmed resistant hypertension, RDN is associated with a reduction in BP and a sustained improvement in mental health-related aspects of QoL.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)