RESUMEN

Objective: We hypothesize that visualizing inner-ear systematically in both cochlear view (oblique coronal plane) and in mid-modiolar section (axial plane) and following three sequential steps simplifies, identification of inner-ear malformation types. Methods: Pre-operative computer-tomography (CT) scans of temporal bones of 112 ears with various inner ear malformation (IEM) types were taken for analysis. Images were analyzed using DICOM viewers, 3D slicer, and OTOPLAN®. The inner-ear was captured in the oblique-coronal plane for the measurement of length and width of cochlear basal turn which is also called as A-, and B-values respectively (Step 1). In the same plane, the angular-turns of lateral-wall (LW) of cochlear basal turn were measured (Step 2). As Step 3, the mid-modiolar section of inner ear was captured in the axial plane by following the A-value and perpendicular to cochlear view. From the mid-modiolar section, the outer-contour of inner ear was captured manually by following contrasting gray area between fluid filled and bony promontory and was compared to known resembling objects to identify IEM types (Step 3). Results: Following reference values have emerged from our analysis: A-, and B-values (Step 1) on average are >8 mm and >5.5 mm respectively, in normal cochleae (NA), enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome (EVAS), incomplete partition (IP) type-I and -II, whereas it is <8 mm and <5.5 mm respectively, in IP type-III and cochlear hypoplasia (CH). Angular-turn of LW is consistently observed in cochlear basal turn (Step 2), is 540° in NA and EVAS, 450° in IP-II, and 360° in IP types I & III. In subjects with CH type, angular-turn of LW is either 360° or 450° or 540°. In true mid-modiolar section, outer-contour of inner-ear (Step-3), other than in CH and cystic inner-ear malformations, resembles recognizable shapes of known objects. Absence of EVA is an additional characteristic that confirms diagnosis of CH when the A-, B-values, and angular-turn of LW can be similar to other anatomical types. Drawing a straight line along posterior edge of internal auditory canal (IAC) in axial view can differentiate a true common cavity (CC) from cochlear aplasia-vestibular cavity (VC). Conclusion: Three-step process proposed in this study captures inner-ear in cochlear view as well in mid-modiolar sections visualizing key features of inner-ear in identification of IEM types. Level of Evidence: Level 1.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To understand the growth rate of mastoid thickness and skull width associated with the age for both normal and malformed inner-ear anatomy groups. Also, to determine if there is any mathematical relation between cochlear size as measured by the "A" value against the age, mastoid thickness, and skull width. METHODS: Ninety-two computed tomography image datasets of human temporal bone were made available that contained normal (n = 44) and malformed inner-ear (n = 48) anatomies. The age of the subjects ranged from 6 months to 79 years. CE marked OTOPLAN preplanning otology software was used to load the patient's preoperative images for making all the measurements including mastoid thickness, skull width, and the cochlear size as measured by the "A" value. Mastoid thickness was measured both in axial and coronal planes starting from the cochlear entrance to the skull surface, with the line in plane with the basal turn of the cochlea. Skull width was measured from side to side in both axial and coronal planes from the image slice that gave the highest width. The cochlear size in terms of basal turn diameter "A" was measured from "Cochlear View" in the oblique coronal plane. RESULTS: Mastoid thickness and skull width increased with age in a logarithmic manner. The mastoid thickness increased from a minimum of 17 mm to around 34 mm and the skull width increased from 105 mm to around 146 mm as the age increased from 6 months to 20 years. At the age of around 20, both the mastoid thickness and skull width reached the plateau and thereafter with a very little growth. The skull width was linearly correlated with the mastoid thickness conveying the fact that bigger the head size is, thicker will be the mastoid. The size of the cochlea as measured by the "A" value did not have any meaningful correlation with the age, mastoid thickness, and skull width. This conveys the message that the cochlear size is independent of the overall size of head and the age of patient. CONCLUSIONS: Mastoid thickness and skull width increased with age, while the cochlear size was independent of age, mastoid thickness, and the size of the skull.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to obtain a better understanding of the number and distribution of spiral ganglion cell bodies (SGCB) in the central modiolus trunk of the human cochlea with normal hearing as well as with hearing loss due to various pathological conditions. A literature review was performed using the key words 'human spiral ganglion cell population', 'analysis of spiral ganglion cell population', 'survival of human spiral ganglion cells', 'human Rosenthal's canal', 'human ganglion cell counts', and 'distribution of human spiral ganglion cells' to identify articles published between 1968 and 2018. Articles were included if the number of SGCB in the four segments of the human cochlea and angular depth distribution of the SGCB were stated. Of 236 articles initially identified, 19 articles met the inclusion criteria. SGCB inside the Rosenthal's canal (RC) in the modiolus trunk extended to an angular depth of 630-680° which is near the end of the second turn of the cochlea. SGCBs in Segment IV of the cochlea account for approximately 25-30% of the entire SGCB population irrespective of the cochlear condition (normal vs. pathologic). In normal hearing subjects, the total number of SGCB ranged between 23,910 and 33,702 and in patients with hearing loss between 5733 and 28,220. This literature review elaborates on the current state of knowledge about the number and distribution of SGCB in the human cochlea.

Asunto(s)