RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) possesses a high degree of malignancy and exhibits poor therapeutic outcomes and prognosis. However, its pathogenesis remains unclear. With the development of macrogene sequencing technology, changes in the intestinal flora have been found to be highly related to the development of EC, although discrepancies and controversies remain in this research area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane's Central Controlled Trials Register and the Scientific Network's database search projects based on systematically reviewed preferred reporting projects and meta-analyses. We used Engauge Digitizer for data extraction and Stata 15.1 for data analysis. In addition, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for grade grading and forest and funnel plots, sensitivity, and Egger and Beggar tests to evaluate the risk of bias. RESULTS: This study included 10 studies that assessed stool, tumor, and nontumor esophageal mucosa (gastroscopy and surgical resection) samples from 527 individuals, including 273 patients with EC and 254 healthy control group. We observed remarkable differences in microbial diversity in EC patients compared to healthy controls. The Chao1 index (46.01 vs. 42.67) was significantly increased in EC patients, whereas the Shannon index (14.90 vs. 19.05), ACE (39.24 vs. 58.47), and OTUs(28.93 vs. 70.10) were significantly lower. At the phylum level, the abundance of Bacteroidetes (37.89 vs. 32.77) increased significantly, whereas that of Firmicutes (37.63 vs. 38.72) decreased significantly; the abundance of Clostridium and Verruciformis increased, while that of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria decreased to varying degrees. The abundance of Bacteroides (8.60 vs. 15.10) and Streptococcaceae (15.08 vs. 27.05) significantly reduced in EC. CONCLUSIONS: According to our meta-analysis, in patients with EC, the Chao1 index increased, whereas the Shannon and the OTUs decreased. At the phylum level, the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly, whereas that of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased significantly. At the genus/family level, the abundance of Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae and Streptococcaceae decreased significantly, whereas that of Veillonellaceae increased. This meta-analysis identified changes in gut microbiota in patients with EC; however, its conclusions were inconsistent.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Humanos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/microbiología , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Heces/microbiología , Análisis de Secuencia de ADNRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after multiple nucleos(t)ide analogue (NAs) failure treatment. METHODS: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients who had a suboptimal response or developed resistance to two or more previous NAs treatments were included, and all subjects were treated with ETV in combination with ADV for ≥ 24 months. Complete virologic response (CVR) was defined as an undetectability of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level during treatment. Safety assessment was based on the increasing of serum creatinine and creatine kinase levels. RESULTS: A total of 45 eligible patients were included. Twenty-five patients had been treated with lamivudine (LAM) or telbivudine (LdT) and developed genotypic resistance. Resistance to ADV was present in 18 patients and 4 patients had a suboptimal response to ETV. Two patients had a resistance to both LAM and ADV. The cumulative probabilities of CVR at 12 and 24 months of ETV + ADV treatment were 88.9% (40/45) and 97.8% (44/45), respectively. Although one patient failed to achieve CVR, its serum HBV DNA level decreased by 3.3 log copies/mL after 24 months of combination therapy. The cumulative probability of HBeAg seroconversion was 15.6% (7/45) and 26.7% (12/45) at 12 and 24 months of treatment, respectively. History of prior exposure to specific NAs did not make a difference to ETV + ADV treatment outcome. There were no significant adverse events related to ETV + ADV therapy observed in the study subjects. CONCLUSION: ETV + ADV can be used as an effective and safe rescue therapy in patients after multiple NA therapy failures, especially in the areas where tenofovir is not yet available.