Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 43(12): 1484-92, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199862

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results of submerged and non-submerged implants for posterior single-tooth replacements and to assess patient-based outcomes. Twenty patients were included in the study. A split-mouth design was used; implants inserted using a submerged technique were compared to those inserted with a non-submerged technique. Implants were restored with metal-ceramic crowns after 3 months. Reconstructions were examined at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Standardized radiographs were made. Radiographic crestal bone level changes were calculated, as well as soft tissue parameters, including pocket probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and gingival index. Results were analyzed by two-way repeated measures of variance (ANOVA). To evaluate patient-based outcomes, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire at the 6-month follow-up; the Wilcoxon paired signed rank test was used to compare scores. The data of 18 patients were reviewed. During 24 months, non-submerged implants (0.57 ± 0.21 mm) showed significantly lower bone loss than submerged implants (0.68 ± 0.22 mm) (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction with non-submerged implants (median 87.5) was significantly higher than with submerged implants (median 81.5) (P<0.01). Non-submerged implants showed comparable clinical results to submerged implants and resulted in higher patient satisfaction due to decreased surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantes Dentales de Diente Único , Adulto , Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Coronas , Índice de Placa Dental , Diseño de Prótesis Dental , Prótesis Dental de Soporte Implantado , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice Periodontal , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Marmara Univ Dent Fac ; 2(1): 424-8, 1994 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9582625

RESUMEN

Class V abrasion, erosion and caries lesions restored with composite resin seem to be more susceptible to microleakage, because the gingival margin is usually placed in cementum and/or dentine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage, in vitro, of a dentinal bonding system using a technique of restoration with a positive and a negative control. This study was accomplished using extracted human teeth and dye penetration technique. The teeth were examined for microleakage after one month. It was concluded that in the gingival wall of the cavity microleakage was significantly reduced when the dentinal bonding agent and composite resin was placed and polymerized incrementally from enamel, to cementum.


Asunto(s)
Resinas Compuestas/uso terapéutico , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Adaptación Marginal Dental , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/uso terapéutico , Diente Premolar , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Preparación de la Cavidad Dental , Filtración Dental/prevención & control , Técnica de Dilución de Colorante/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Distribución Aleatoria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA