RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To uncover the predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) on early pregnancy loss. METHODS: A total of 535 individuals were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The early pregnancy losses (EPL) group included patients between 18-35 years old who experienced EPL. The control group comprised healthy pregnant women who gave birth at ≥37 weeks. RESULTS: The EPL group had significantly lower plateletcrit (p=0.04), platelet distribution width (PDW, p<0.0001), and RDW (p<0.0001) and higher monocyte (p<0.0001) and SIRI (p<0.0001) values than the control group. The hemoglobin, white blood cells, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, mean platelet volume, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and SII values were not significantly different between the EPL and control groups (p>0.05). The cut-off value for the SIRI that offers the best sensitivity/specificity balance was 1.48 (sensitivity of 63%; specificity of 63%) in the receiver operating characteristics curve. Among the inflammatory parameters for predicting EPL, PDW had highest specificity (84%), and RDW had the highest sensitivity (80%). CONCLUSION: This study provides compelling evidence that various inflammatory pathways may significantly contribute to EPL pathogenesis. Moreover, our findings suggest that SIRI could be a more effective marker than NLR, PLR, MLR, and SII in predicting EPL in an ongoing pregnancy, thereby potentially revolutionizing early pregnancy loss diagnostics.

Asunto(s)

Aborto Espontáneo , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aborto Espontáneo/inmunología , Aborto Espontáneo/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Adulto Joven , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/inmunología , Adolescente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recuento de Plaquetas , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Monocitos/inmunología , Linfocitos/inmunología

RESUMEN

This prospective controlled study investigates the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on female sexual function, comparing recovered COVID-19-positive women with those uninfected by the virus. It aims to elucidate the broader impacts on sexual health and psychological well-being. This prospective controlled study included nonpregnant women of reproductive age and their partners, divided into COVID-19- positive (recovered) and negative groups. Data collection took place on average 6 months after COVID-19 recovery. Information was collected on the number of people exposed to COVID-19 and the severity of infection (mild, moderate or severe). Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing sexual function (female sexual function index [FSFI]), anxiety (state-trait anxiety inventory [STAI]) and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory). We compared sexual function, psychological well-being and demographic characteristics between the groups using statistical analyses to identify significant differences. The study reveals significant resilience in sexual function, psychological well-being, and demographic characteristics among the participants, regardless of COVID-19 status. No marked differences were found in sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, or pain during sexual activity between the groups. Psychological assessments indicated uniform anxiety levels across both cohorts, underscoring a theme of psychological resilience. The analysis of partners' sexual function highlighted minimal indirect impacts of the pandemic on intimate relationships. Despite the extensive global health implications, this study demonstrates resilience in female sexual function and psychological health among those affected by the virus. These findings emphasize the need for ongoing research and targeted interventions to support individuals navigate the pandemic-evolving challenges, highlighting resilience and adaptability as key factors in maintaining well-being.

Asunto(s)

Ansiedad , COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Conducta Sexual/psicología , SARS-CoV-2 , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Salud Sexual , Adulto Joven , Parejas Sexuales/psicología

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of intraabdominal irrigation with saline on postoperative gastrointestinal functions and short-term complications in patients who underwent cesarean section under general anesthesia. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between March 2022 and May 2022 and included 60 patients who underwent elective cesarean. The participants were randomized into two groups: abdominal irrigation (n=30) and control group (n=30). Participants undergo a standard cesarean procedure, and general anesthesia was preferred. The patients were questioned regarding nausea, vomiting, highest pain scores, time of flatus, and stool passage during the postoperative period. Results: Although no significant differences were found between the two groups (p>0.05), the return of bowel functions, i.e., passage of flatus and stool, occurred in a shorter period in the irrigation group (19.53 and 34.63 versus 16.73 and 33.7). The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores of the two groups were comparable; VAS score of 4-6 was the sole difference when comparing both groups. Although postoperative vomiting was more common in the control group, no significant difference in postoperative vomiting, postoperative nausea, and postoperative antiemetic need was found between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: The results revealed that intraoperative abdominal irrigation did not affect gastrointestinal functions and short-term maternal morbidity and did not provide additional benefits.