RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the isokinetic muscle strength and range of motion (ROM) values of the ankle between patients diagnosed with C3 chronic venous insufficiency (group 1, n=57) and healthy individuals (group 2, n=30). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After identifying the venous refilling time (VRT) of all participants, the active ROM of the ankle joint and plantar flexion (PF) and dorsi-flexion (DF) muscle strength in the concentric/concentric mode at angular velocities of 60°/sec and 120°/sec were measured. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the demographic data of groups 1 and 2 (P>0.05). In total, 102 lower extremities were included in group 1 and 60 lower extremities in group 2. The VRT of the patients in group 1 was 15.5±5.6 seconds, the PF ROM of the ankle joint was 39.3°±9.5°, and the DF ROM of the ankle joint was 27°±8°; in group 2, the VRT, PF ROM, and DF ROM were 36±8.1 seconds, 41°±6.2°, and 27.2°±7.5°, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of VRT (P<0.05); however, no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of ankle ROM (P>0.05). Statistically significant difference was found in terms of all parameters of isokinetic muscle strength measurements, such as peak torque, peak torque/body weight, total work done, and ratio (DF/PF) in group 1 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The lower extremity muscle strength of patients with chronic venous insufficiency was low, and this weakness was prominent particularly in the direction of PF.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. INTRODUCTION: A new method of accurately assessing the compromised elbow's proprioception was developed for this postsurgical population using information from previous neurophysiologic proprioception studies of healthy elbows. HYPOTHESIS: This retrospective cohort study investigated the patterns and the degree of proprioceptive impairment and recovery following arthroscopic surgery for chronic lateral epicondylitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants had undergone arthroscopic elbow surgery two years prior to this study (n=15). Healthy, non-injured volunteers with similar demographics (n=15) served as controls. Both groups were evaluated using quantitative measures of joint position sense for proprioceptive functioning. In order to obtain the most accurate proprioceptive measurements, interindividual interaction and visual input biases were eliminated. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to compare qualitative self-reported measures of proprioceptive function in arthroscopic surgery patients before surgery and two years post-surgery. RESULTS: Active and passive joint repositioning outcome measurements were similar between groups (p>0.05). No significant differences were found among any angles except one: passive joint position sense at 120° of flexion (p<0.05). At this angle, the arthroscopy group showed greater deviation from target angles than the control group. The novel proprioceptive testing method we developed was found to be accurate and reliable. DISCUSSION: Outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis with no decortication yielded outcomes measure similar to those of healthy controls. The sole significant difference was at 120° flexion passive joint repositioning, with a higher negative angular deviation from the target point. We propose that our study results and specific proprioception method may have implications for improving accuracy of future elbow arthroscopy and proprioceptive recovery in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, low-powered prospective randomized trial.