RESUMEN
The Semantic Coherence Dataset has been designed to experiment with semantic coherence metrics. More specifically, the dataset has been built to the ends of testing whether probabilistic measures, such as perplexity, provide stable scores to analyze spoken language. Perplexity, which was originally conceived as an information-theoretic measure to assess the probabilistic inference properties of language models, has recently been proven to be an appropriate tool to categorize speech transcripts based on semantic coherence accounts. More specifically, perplexity has been successfully employed to discriminate subjects suffering from Alzheimer Disease and healthy controls. Collected data include speech transcripts, intended to investigate semantic coherence at different levels: data are thus arranged into two classes, to investigate intra-subject semantic coherence, and inter-subject semantic coherence. In the former case transcripts from a single speaker can be employed to train and test language models and to explore whether the perplexity metric provides stable scores in assessing talks from that speaker, while allowing to distinguish between two different forms of speech, political rallies and interviews. In the latter case, models can be trained by employing transcripts from a given speaker, and then used to measure how stable the perplexity metric is when computed using the model from that user and transcripts from different users. Transcripts were extracted from talks lasting almost 13 hours (overall 12:45:17 and 120,326 tokens) for the former class; and almost 30 hours (29:47:34 and 252,270 tokens) for the latter one. Data herein can be reused to perform analyses on measures built on top of language models, and more in general on measures that are aimed at exploring the linguistic features of text documents.
RESUMEN
Devising automatic tools to assist specialists in the early detection of mental disturbances and psychotic disorders is to date a challenging scientific problem and a practically relevant activity. In this work we explore how language models (that are probability distributions over text sequences) can be employed to analyze language and discriminate between mentally impaired and healthy subjects. We have preliminarily explored whether perplexity can be considered a reliable metrics to characterize an individual's language. Perplexity was originally conceived as an information-theoretic measure to assess how much a given language model is suited to predict a text sequence or, equivalently, how much a word sequence fits into a specific language model. We carried out an extensive experimentation with healthy subjects, and employed language models as diverse as N-grams - from 2-grams to 5-grams - and GPT-2, a transformer-based language model. Our experiments show that irrespective of the complexity of the employed language model, perplexity scores are stable and sufficiently consistent for analyzing the language of individual subjects, and at the same time sensitive enough to capture differences due to linguistic registers adopted by the same speaker, e.g., in interviews and political rallies. A second array of experiments was designed to investigate whether perplexity scores may be used to discriminate between the transcripts of healthy subjects and subjects suffering from Alzheimer Disease (AD). Our best performing models achieved full accuracy and F-score (1.00 in both precision/specificity and recall/sensitivity) in categorizing subjects from both the AD class, and control subjects. These results suggest that perplexity can be a valuable analytical metrics with potential application to supporting early diagnosis of symptoms of mental disorders.