RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cure rate for subjects with refractory or relapsing metastatic neuroblastoma is <5%. In the search for a novel therapy, continuous daily oral administration of imatinib mesylate was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four subjects were enrolled in a two-stage study. Imatinib was administered for the first 4 weeks (cycle) at 170 mg/sqm b.i.d. If no major toxicity occurred, the dose was escalated to 300 mg/sqm b.i.d. for a maximum of 12 cycles. Clinical response and toxicity were evaluated according to international criteria. Pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA expression were also determined in a subset of subjects. RESULTS: Five (21%) complete responses, with one subject still alive at 68 months, and 2 (8%) partial responses lasting up to 29 months were obtained. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. At steady-state, PK exposure (69.7 µg h/ml) was similar to that of adults receiving 1000 mg/die. Responses appear to correlate with the absence or presence of metastasis in the bone marrow (BM) alone, with low TH expression levels at study entry and low imatinib exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib mesylate was well-tolerated and effective in the subset of subjects with low BM infiltration as only site of metastasis. Study identifier EudraCT: 2005-005778-63.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This review summarizes the present status of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation (M&S) and its application in support of pediatric drug research. We address the reasons that PBPK is suited to the current needs of pediatric drug development and pharmacotherapy in light of the evolution in pediatric PBPK methodologies and approaches, which were originally developed for the purpose of toxicologic evaluation. Also discussed is the current degree of confidence in using PBPK to support pediatric drug development and registration and the key factors essential for robust results and broader adoption of pediatric PBPK M&S.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The positive results obtained with cyclosporine-A both in an experimental model and in selected patients with advanced systemic lupus erythematosus support the hypothesis that the drug could be used as a steroid sparer in the earliest stages of active disease. To determine the 12-month clinical efficacy (disease control and steroid sparing), safety, and tolerability of low-dose cyclosporine-A plus steroids versus steroids alone, we designed a multicenter, open, prospective, randomized, pilot study, controlled for parallel groups. The patients were then followed up to month 24. A total of 18 consenting patients with recently diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus of moderate severity indicated for the use of steroids in acute boluses and subsequently per os were enrolled at two university hospital medical centers. The protocol was based on three 1-g boluses of 6-methylprednisolone followed by cyclosporine-A (<5 mg/kg per day) plus prednisone 0.5-1 mg/kg per day per os, reduced by 5 mg/day every 2 weeks following clinical remission, versus the same doses of oral prednisone alone. The efficacy evaluation was based on a four-point scale (from absent/none to severe) for signs and symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus and immunoserological parameters. The disease activity index and cumulative prednisone dose per patient were analyzed. Any adverse events were reported. All patients showed a reduction in disease activity index within the 1st month. The results were significantly better in the group with cyclosporine-A plus prednisone throughout month 12 (baseline and 12-month disease activity indexes: 21.3+/-8.6 and 5.0+/-2.5 versus 20.4+/-7.1 and 8.8+/-6.0 in the prednisone group, P<0.05). The 12-month cumulative mean dose of prednisone was significantly lower in the group with both cyclosporine-A plus prednisone (179.4+/-40.1 versus 231.8+/-97.1 mg/kg, P<0.005). No unusual adverse events related to the study drugs have been reported. In particular, renal function and blood pressure monitoring revealed no significant changes from mean baseline values in either group. No disease flares were reported in the group treated with cyclosporine-A plus prednisone during the 12- to 24-month period. Thus cyclosporine-A represents a useful corticosteroid sparer in the maintenance of clinical remission in patients with an early-stage, active systemic lupus erythematosus.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the current ongoing debate regarding how to optimise clinical research on rheumatoid arthritis. Bearing in mind the main difficulties represented by the particular characteristics of the disease and its treatment, as well as the limitations of some of the trials that have been carried out over the last thirty years, we discuss how some of the general statistical considerations regarding all clinical trials should be applied to those specifically designed to assess disease-controlling antirheumatic therapies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of radiographs of the feet of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the evaluation of RA classification and outcome. METHODS: Within a multicenter therapeutic trial, baseline and 12 month radiographs of the hands, wrists, and feet of 284 patients with early RA (< or = 4 years; mean 1.4; median 0.6) were scored according to a modified Larsen-Dale method by an independent radiological reading committee, blinded to the treatment, clinical, and laboratory data. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (11%) had only foot erosions at baseline. Twelve month progression in the eroded joint count was more frequent in the patients with foot erosions than in those without (63% CI 55 divided by 71 vs 42% CI 35 divided by 50). CONCLUSION: Foot radiographs facilitate the identification of patients with early erosive RA. Foot involvement is indicative of more aggressive disease. Assessment of foot radiographs allows the most adequate therapeutic strategy to be adopted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A prospective, open, multicentre, randomized study with a blinded radiological end-point was started in 1991. The aim of the study was to assess whether cyclosporin A (CyA) controls ongoing anatomical damage in active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) better than conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as used in everyday clinical practice. A total of 340 consenting patients with early RA (mean duration 1.4 yr) were recruited; 167 were randomized to CyA 3mg/kg per day and 173 to DMARDs. Hand, wrist and foot X-rays were blindly scored by a central committee of three radiologists using the Larsen-Dale method. Any side-effects were carefully recorded. The control of clinical symptoms was similar in both groups. Radiological evaluation of 284 patients (141 on CyA; 143 on DMARDs) after 12 months showed a significant decrease in the mean progression in the eroded joint count (1.3 +/- 3.1 vs 2.4 +/- 3.0, P < 0.001). There was also better maintenance on treatment with CyA than in the group treated with DMARDs (89.2 vs 77.5%, respectively; P = 0.002). CyA seems to offer greater control of ongoing anatomical joint damage in early RA than conventional DMARDs after 12 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of low-dose cyclosporin A (CsA) to control radiologic disease progression, and to assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of CsA, compared with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this long-term, multicenter, prospective, open, blinded end point, randomized trial, 361 consenting patients with early (<4 years since diagnosis) active RA were enrolled. Of the eligible patients, 167 were treated with CsA at 3 mg/kg/day, and 173 with DMARDs. The decision to use conventional antirheumatic drugs as controls was based on the fact that joint erosion could be expected to occur after 1 year regardless of the type of DMARD being used. The possibility of switching therapies in both groups was intended to keep the largest possible number of patients in the study. RESULTS: Blinded evaluation of hand and foot radiographs after 12 months of treatment showed that CsA led to a significant (P < 0.001) delay in the mean +/- SD progression in the eroded joint count (1.3 +/- 3.1 versus 2.4 +/- 3.0 for the control group) and in the joint damage score (3.6 +/- 8.9 versus 6.9 +/- 9.1 for the control group), both measured by the Larsen-Dale method. When only the patients without erosion at baseline were considered (37 in the CsA-treated group and 54 in the control group), erosion appeared in only 10.8% of the CsA-treated patients, but in 51.8% of the controls (P = 0.00005). Low-dose CsA was as effective as traditional DMARDs in controlling clinical symptoms. Maintenance on the initially prescribed treatment regimen ("survival on treatment") was also better at 12 months with CsA than with DMARDs (89.2% versus 77.5%; P = 0.002). The tolerability of CsA was acceptable. CONCLUSION: These 12-month results suggest that low-dose CsA decreases the rate of further joint damage in previously involved joints as well as the rate of new joint involvement in previously uninvolved joints, in patients with early RA.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We studied Leu 7+ cell distribution and natural killer (NK) activity in the peripheral blood of six patients who had peripheral neuropathy and monoclonal IgM protein directed against myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG IgM). We did not find any difference between patients and control subjects (healthy or polyneuropathic, some with IgM monoclonal paraprotein but without anti-MAG activity). The presence of autologous sera did not interfere with these results. We noted an increase in Leu 11+ cell percentages after pre-incubation of the patient cells with autologous sera but the phenotypes of cells from control subjects did not change after incubation with autologous or patient sera.

Asunto(s)