RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite great improvements in the short-term patient and kidney graft survival, the long-term morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients still remains a significant problem. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of both donor and transplant recipient factors, as well as renal function indices on the very long-term (>25 years) kidney allograft survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 41 kidney transplant recipients (KTR), group A: follow-up = 25 years, 20 KTR, 10 male, mean age (mean [M] ± standard deviation [SD]): 34.6 ± 12.6 years, 14 living donors (LD), 6 cadaveric donors (CD); group B: follow-up > 25 years, 21 KTR, 16 male, mean age (M ± SD): 30.86 ± 12.37 years, 14 LD, 7 CD). Kidney graft origin, post-kidney transplantation diabetes mellitus, HLA compatibility, delayed graft function, and acute rejection episodes were also analyzed retrospectively. Statistical analysis with Mann-Whitney test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed (SPSS 20.0 for Windows). RESULTS: The mean age of CDs was lower than that of LDs: CD mean age (M ± SD): 23.84 ± 16.26 years vs LD mean age: 52.75 ± 12.42 years (P < .001). Cadaveric kidney graft was associated with better renal allograft function 10, 15, and 25 years post kidney transplant. None of the other factors analyzed reached statistical significance between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The age of the donor and the kidney graft origin are important co-factors of the very long-term kidney allograft survival.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Renal transplantation is regarded as the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Despite significant improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive therapy, long-term graft survival has not markedly increased over the years, due in part to the occurrence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and September 2011, we performed 592 kidney transplantations (214 living and 378 cadaveric donors). All patients received induction therapy with interleukin (IL)-2 monoclonal antibodies or antithymoglobulin (ATG) combined with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or mTOR antagonists and steroids. All CMV-seronegative patients and all subjects receiving ATG induction were prescribed prophylactic therapy with ganciclovir-intravenous (IV) for 15 days 2.5 mg/kg BW bid and thereafter oral valgancyclovir once a day. CMV infection was diagnosed using a CMV-PVR of ≥ 600 copies. We analyzed the time to manifestations of CMV infection, or positive CMV-PCR, patient and graft survival, serum creatinine (Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values before and after CMV infection, as well as type of immunosuppression therapy. RESULTS: The overall incidences of CMV infection and CMV disease were 76/592 (12.8%) and 23/592 (3.9%), respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) times to positive CMV-PCR and CMV disease were 16.66 ± 23.38 months and 106 ± 61.2 (range, 28-215) days, respectively. Mortality was 1% (6/592) among our whole population, 7.9% (6/76) for CMV-infected, and 26% (6/23) in the CMV disease cohort. Cr and BUN showed no significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: CMV infection and CMV disease comprise significant clinical problems, increasing morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic anti-CMV treatment is of paramount importance.