RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in observed and self-reported team dynamics between those who received versus those who did not receive TeamSTEPPS training prior to an interprofessional escape room scenario. METHODS: Final-year pharmacy (N = 27) and physician assistant (N = 88) students participated in an escape room featuring pediatric dosing, asthma, otitis media, type 1 diabetes, and vaccine fundamentals. In total, 29 teams were randomized to control (14) or intervention arm (15). The control group went to the escape room and then returned to the classroom for a team-building module including TeamSTEPPS training. The intervention group started with the team-building module then went to the escape room. One faculty observer was assigned to each team and utilized the Performance Assessment Communication and Teamwork (PACT) expert-observer form to assess team performance. Post-event, students completed an abbreviated PACT post-assessment and a self-reflection on the prompt "What were the most important takeaways from today's interprofessional education experience?" RESULTS: On the PACT expert-observer form, significantly higher global scores were noted for the intervention arm on all items except situation monitoring. On the aggregate observer data from all stations, leadership emerged as statistically different between the 2 groups. On the PACT post-assessment, the intervention arm reported significantly more leadership during the simulation. On the self-reflections, 70.9% versus 64% in the control arm recognized the importance of teamwork in managing patients. CONCLUSIONS: Just-in-time TeamSTEPPS training improved observed and to a lesser extent, self-reported teamwork and communication skills. Incorporating TeamSTEPPS training immediately prior to an interprofessional education experience may enhance team performance.
Asunto(s)
Educación en Farmacia , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Humanos , Niño , Liderazgo , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
This study aimed to measure the impact of an interprofessional education (IPE) activity on student knowledge and attitudes regarding patient safety. Two 4 h IPE activities were designed to provide students with foundational information regarding patient safety. Interprofessional teams discussed the individual curricula and roles/responsibilities of each represented health profession. Teams then served on a mock committee tasked with completing a root cause analysis of a fictitious sentinel event. Students completed a pre/post-quiz and pre/post-attitudes survey to measure knowledge and attitudes. Five months later, students reconvened to serve on a second mock sentinel event committee. Students completed a post-activity survey after the second activity. Four hundred and seven students participated in the first activity, while two hundred and eighty participated in the second activity. Quiz score comparisons revealed improved knowledge, with post-quiz scores being significantly higher. Pre- and post-attitude survey comparisons indicated a significant improvement in participant attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork. Seventy-eight percent of students reported the IPE activity enhanced their ability to "engage other health professions students in shared patient-centered care". This IPE activity resulted in knowledge and attitude improvement related to patient safety.
RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a peer-taught interprofessional education (IPE) activity on pharmacy and physician assistant (PA) student self-assessed confidence and attitudes related to professional skills. First-year pharmacy (n = 210) and PA (n = 45) students participated in a two-hour IPE activity. Forty-five teams consisting of one PA and at least four pharmacy students completed three peer-teaching stations focused on diabetes device education, pulmonary device teaching/case workup, and physical assessment skills. Students completed a pre- and post-activity confidence survey and a post-activity attitudes survey. For pharmacy students, highest confidence gains were noted on the items related to performing a physical exam. For PA students, largest gains were noted on the items related to insulin delivery systems. Eighty-three percent of students either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement "I learned things during this IPE activity that I will implement in clinical practice." Seventy six percent of students felt that the physical assessment station was "beneficial or very beneficial" to their learning. A vast majority of students noted the IPE activity "somewhat or definitely" enhanced their communication with other health professionals and promoted a climate of mutual respect. In conclusion, peer teaching improved student attitudes and confidence.
RESUMEN
Early provision of interprofessional education (IPE) is imperative to ensure effective communication between healthcare professionals. However, there are several barriers to offering adequate IPE, including space restrictions and lack of human resources, prompting exploration of alternative modalities. In 2019, an IPE activity was offered in person with 213 pharmacy and 45 physician assistant (PA) students participating in one-on-one team huddles focusing on managing an acutely ill patient. In 2020, the same IPE activity, including 194 pharmacy and 45 PA students, was offered virtually. Peer evaluations, an attitudes survey, and confidence surveys were administered to evaluate the impact of the IPE activity. A student t-test and descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the data. On average, PA students in the virtual group rated their peers higher than PA students in the in-person group, with little difference in the pharmacy peer evaluation of their PA partner. Ninety percent of pharmacy students and 91% of PA students in the virtual group felt that "they learned something new regarding therapeutic management" from their partner versus 84% of pharmacy and 81% of PA students in the in-person group. In conclusion, using a virtual modality for a communications-focused IPE was not detrimental to student attitudes and did not adversely affect peer perceptions.