RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To standardize the use of sterile powder for injection redissolution solvent and intravenous drugs diluent solvent， and ensure the safety of clinical drug use. METHODS The intravenous drug resolvent generation system and the intravenous drug solvent incompatibility rules library were constructed and operated by prescription-checking pharmacist team in our hospital by formulating a list of intravenous drugs needed to be dissolved with sterilized water for injection and a contraindication list of intravenous solvent compatibility. The unreasonable medical orders reviewed and intervened in our hospital from January to April 2023 （before the implementation of the intravenous drug solvent incompatibility rules library） and from May to August 2023 （after the implementation） were analyzed statistically to compare the number of unreasonable solvent selection orders， interception rate， and the success rate of pharmacists’ interventions for unreasonable solvent selection orders before and after the implementation. RESULTS Before the implementation of the solvent incompatibility rules library， a total of 5 229 groups of medical orders with unreasonable solvent selection in our hospital were identified， among which there were 1 204 groups of seriously unreasonable medical orders， with interception rate of 23.03% and the success rate of pharmacists’ intervention of 15.90%. After the implementation of the solvent incompatibility rules library， the total number of medical orders with unreasonable solvent selection was 3 258 groups， among which there were 1 148 groups of seriously unreasonable medical orders， with interception rate of 35.24% and success rate of pharmacists’ intervention of 24.83%， being significantly higher than before implementation （P＜0.01 or P＜0.001）. CONCLUSIONS The establishment and application of the intravenous drug resolvent generation system and the solvent incompatibility rules library can significantly increase the interception rate of unreasonable solvent selection orders and the success rate of pharmacists’ interventions, and ensure the safety of clinical drug use.
RESUMEN
Objective To discover the effects of the Prescription Administrative Policy in force on the quality of the prescriptions in a tertiary hospital in 2007. Methods The prescriptions of 400 cases were sampled systematically for evaluation, and 60 patients were interviewed. Results The average eligibility rate of the prescriptions was but 37. 2% in this hospital, which was mainly plagued by incompleteness, nonstandard and irrationality found in prescriptions. Implementation of the Policy contributed to a significant improvement of some indicators. For example, the eligibility rate increased by 12. 2% (P=0. 004) ,the percentage of the use of antimicrobial agents dropped significantly (P=0. 001),and the percentage of generic names used rose significantly (P = 0. 000). Conclusions The implementation of the Policy is highly positive for prescription quality.
RESUMEN
0,most symptoms of ADR were reported for the first time with the homogeneous literature ratio being 0.The predominant outcome of severe ADR were hospitalization or delayed hospitalization course,followed by increased risk of death or patients' permanent or distinct disabling.CONCLUSION:New and severe ADR should be given close attention in the clinic to guard against severe ADR.
RESUMEN
Objective:To investigate the recognition degree and attitude to adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports among the healthcare professionals in our hospital.Method:Through random cluster sampling,the doctors,nurses and pharmacists in our hospital were interviewed on the spot.The questionnaires were input by EPI6.04 and analyzed by soft- ware SPSS11.5.Result:1077 eligible questionnaires were obtained and the recovery was 89.8%.Our bealthcare profes- sionals had a good recognition of basic ADR knowledge.The pharmacists had a better recognition degree than doctors and nurses.The better academic background the healthcare professionals had,the higher their score of recognition was,and there was a significant difference among them.There was no significant difference among the Scores of the healthcare profes- sionals with different working years,and nor was there among the scores of them with different professional titles.The atti- tude to ADR reporting was entirely right,but there were some wrong ideas.Conclusion:It is urgent to provide more train- ing courses for healthcare professionals so as to raise their consciousness of ADR reporting,ability of discrimination and lev- el of monitoring and avoid serious consequences caused by ADR.