RESUMEN
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are emerging in French hospitals. A VRE outbreak occurred in our hospital, prompting efforts to eradicate the organism. The following interventions were implemented simultaneously to control the outbreak: (1) creation of a VRE control committee; (2) cohorting of VRE carriers in a dedicated ward; (3) extensive screening of contact patients; (4) use of a sensitive technique for detecting VRE in rectal samples; (5) intervention of a dedicated team to reduce consumption of selected antibiotics; (6) information for, and education of, all hospital staff; and (7) electronic tracking of in-hospital transfer and readmission of VRE carriers and contact patients. Over a four-week period following admission of the index case, 37 carriers of a single strain of vanA vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium were identified across seven units. A single additional readmitted contact patient was identified later. Of the 39 VRE-positive patients, two had urinary tract infections and 37 were colonised. Of the 32 patients with known VRE stool concentrations, 23 had low and nine high concentrations. One low-concentration patient precipitated transmission in another unit. This aggressive, co-ordinated, multifaceted strategy was successful in halting a widespread VRE outbreak in our hospital.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Portador Sano , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Heces/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Paris/epidemiología , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Vigilancia de GuardiaRESUMEN
The efficacy of alcohol-based handrubs (ABH) for hand hygiene (HH) compared with handwashing (HW) remains to be established in the clinical setting. Factors associated with severe hand contamination before HH techniques were medical ward, physician and not wearing gloves. Forty-three healthcare workers [HCW, 26 nurses (N), nine nurse assistants (NA) and eight physicians (P)] each performed six HH techniques in random order, immediately after a patient care activity: HW with non-antiseptic soap for 10 (US10) and 30 (US30) s; HW with antiseptic (polyvidone iodine- or chlorhexidine-based) soap for 10 (AS10), 30 (AS30) or 60 (AS60) s; and ABH (Sterillium, Bode Chemie, Germany). The fingertips of the dominant hand were pressed on to agar for culture before and after each HH technique. Five hundred and sixteen specimens were obtained. Log(10)-transformed bacterial count reductions after HH were 0.74, 0.51, 1.13, 1.14, 1.21 and 1.40 for US10, US30, AS10, AS30, AS60 and ABH, respectively; both AS and ABH were significantly better than US. Qualitative assessment showed that 11 of the 256 pre-HH specimens (4.3%) had pathogenic bacteria, and that two of these 11 remained positive after HH (US in both instances).
Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/uso terapéutico , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Mano/microbiología , Personal de Hospital , Jabones/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Desinfectantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Guantes Protectores , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLPE) were isolated from clinical specimens from 130 to 140 patients/year in 1989-1991 in our hospital. In February 1992, a control program was initiated: screening tests in 3 intensive care units (ICUs) and contact-isolation precautions in all units. The septic surgical unit served as an isolation ward for surgical patients from whom ESBLPE was isolated. In 1992, the incidence of ESBLPE acquisition failed to decrease, and most acquisitions occurred in 3 ICUs. Critical evaluation of implementation of isolation procedures in these ICUs prompted corrective measures for barrier precautions. The incidence of acquired cases subsequently decreased, and a second evaluation determined that these measures had been correctly applied. The incidence of acquired cases in the septic surgical unit was lower than those in the other units. Decreases were also found in the incidence of acquisition of other hand-transmitted multidrug-resistant organisms. Barrier precautions, screening tests for ICU patients, and grouping of cohorts after ICU discharge are effective in controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant microorganisms by cross-contamination. The outbreak was effectively controlled without restricting antimicrobial use.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Humanos , Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Control de Infecciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Paris/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to evaluate completeness of tuberculosis notification in Bichat Claude-Bernard University Hospital and to evaluate whether misclassification of atypical mycobacterial infection could have contributed to the inaccuracy of tuberculosis notification. Data from Microbiology Laboratory of the hospital and statutory notifications were compared. From 1 January 1994 to 31 December 1995, 299 tuberculosis cases were diagnosed in the Microbiology Laboratory and 316 cases were notified as tuberculosis. Notification rate for laboratory-documented tuberculosis was 57.5%, was significantly higher in cases with positive acid fast bacilli smear (75%) than without this feature (45%) and was similar in HIV-positive (59.4%) and HIV-negative (63.5%) patients. Among notified cases, diagnosis was established by laboratory proofs in only 54.4% and by clinical signs in 45.6%. Three cases with positive smear and culture growing atypical mycobacteria were wrongly notified. Notification of laboratory-documented tuberculosis was higher than that observed in a previous study in the same hospital, suggesting that the rise of tuberculosis incidence reported in our country could be partially artificial. Nevertheless, extent of notification remains insufficient and needs to be improved by combining microbiological data with current system of notification.